Is Windows XP even safe anymore because of the NSA exploit leak?

It's time for you to get with the time and move on to Win7.

Stop posting racism frogs.

Stop using bad OSes.

Install Gentoo

>>61108208
First of all, why in the fuck are you still running XP?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_5VtoysNFs

File: 343.jpg (10KB, 200x211px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x211px

>>61109814

>>61108208
>Is Windows XP even safe anymore because of the NSA exploit leak?
If you have the SMB1 hotfix installed.
>Is Win2k safe?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvsluie6RzQ

Xp hasn't been safe for a long time champ

>>61108208
Enable the posready updates and its fine.

Aside from the cosmetic differences Windows 2000 and XP are pretty much the same OS underneath. If XP has a security problem it probably also affects 2000.

>>61109967
2000 could even run on a 486.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d33rIWdgc_A

The nsa has backdoors since Win 98, hardware backdoors since 2006

But all we can do is to speculat thta the rabbit hole goes deeper

>>61109879
Did they ever make a 64-bit version of win2k?

>>61108208
>implying it was ever safe
>implying a safe operating system needs thousand of updates that take hours to install
Just buy a typewriter and GTFO.

>>61110521
this anon speaks the truth.

>>61111734
Technically yes but I think it only ever supported Itanium. By the time AMD64 came out Windows XP was already out for like 2-3 years and there was no purpose in an AMD64 port of 2000 so I don't believe they ever made one.

>>61111734
Yes, but it was never released or completed.

>>61113888
64-bit Windows OSes didn't really take off until Vista/7.

>>61114162
Neither did 64bit processors, until Athlon 64.

>>61108208
If you love your hentai games, VNs, and other early 2000s games just install windows 7 or run XP in a virtual machine isolated from the internet.

>>61108208
>Windows XP
winxp is what 13yearolds wanna by hackers use as targetpractice because of how insanely easy it is to hack.
Boot up kali, fireup armitage, and see for yourself.

>>61110521
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSAKEY
Well i guess everything near the 2000 year mark maybe even -5years has software backdoors.

>>61114586
I like how to direct us to the german page so that we cant read the total and utter absence of evidence.
>b-but it says nsakey so its a key for the nsa prolly.
if only the nsa named their key something else... maybe wewkey... all of this couldve been avoided

>>61114858
> too retarded to change two letters in the url or change the language manuelly

>>61108208
> /pol/ LARPing as /g/

thread discarded / 10