Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: Screenshot from 27-06-2017 15:22:56.png (32KB, 846x211px) Image search:
[Google]
32KB, 846x211px
As it turns out, Skylake-X is actually WORSE on efficiency than Broadwell-E, somehow, in someway, Intel has managed to get worse.
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-06/intel-core-i9-7900x-test/
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.computerbase.de%2F2017-06%2Fintel-core-i9-7900x-test%2F&edit-text=
6950X
177W(63C package, 58C core)
3.4GHz @1.07V
7900X
281W(98C package, 94C core)
[email protected]
Interesting parts are the voltages, which are almost the same, but the power draw is lunatic.
Prime95 v26.6 is actually non-AVX, to correct the "only AVX is a housefire on Intel" meme.
Turns out it was a meme.
More details in the article.
Welcome to Intel Bulldozer(also has a similar cache topology as Bulldozer, what could possibly go wrong?)
>>
>>61104986
>AVX throttleclocks
Kek
>>
>>61104986
Are the cache changes the reason for this? Why would they change the caches anyway?
>>
>>61105422
>Why would they change the caches anyway?
To make AVX512 usable
>>
File: toothpaste inside.jpg (31KB, 630x372px) Image search:
[Google]
31KB, 630x372px
>>61105428
>Change cache to make AVX512 useable
>AVX512 isn't useable due to insane temps
Sasuga, Intel.
>>
>>61105428
Name 3 programs that rely on avx512
>>
>>61105502
None, but this is a server arch, so it's gonna be used there.
>>
>>61104986
Intel is finished!
>>
>>61105514
Name one cpu that has avx512
>>
>>61105982
Skylake-X and Xeon Phi
>>
>>61104986
Why are you comparing chips with different clockspeeds?
>>
>>61106239
Because one replaces the other, stock testing is valid-
>>
>>61105502
I heard x264 supports it now. I wonder how 512 bit processing benefits 8 or 10 bit video.
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2