>constantly dreaming of a future where even flyover states

Bruh I get 60Mbps for $20 in a third world country, what the fuck is wrong with USA?

Sorry i live in the first world

>>61103203
ESA is launching satellite based 5G in the near future. Too bad the US is so behind on feature technology. I visited New York last month and their mobile network infrastructure is still shit. Kind of embarrassing really.

>>61103276
If only we had some kind of global war to expedite technological advancement.

>>61103203
elect sane social democrats that want to pour money into the sciences because they are a universal good. but good Luck finding more than 5. have fun with the overwhelming number of scumbags ready to rip you off and butfuck you with personal responsibility and nutjob progressives waiting to grab power to chop your balls off.

I also fell for the CS meme, OP but don't you worry; you're still in time to switch to math. 300K starting.

>>61103203
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/06/low-latency-satellite-broadband-gets-approval-to-serve-us-residents/

>>61103324
..wut?

>>61103203
>tfw live in the capitol of a western country
>work as a consultant for the largest IT-company
>tech companies literally everywhere around me, with CISCO being just across the road
>can only get 35mbps down, 10mbps up at the best

Yet my brother who works in a kindergarden and lives in a small town gets fiber and 1gbps both ways.

AAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!

>>61103619
The internet is a product of WW2/the cold war

>>61103619
>satellite net
Enjoy paying for 1000$/month

What's the problem?

4G can reach 50mbps with decent stability and ping (~40-60ms) especially with a home router and in an area that doesn't have a lot of people using it.
VDSL2 is also already deployed in many places, providing 50mbit/s up to around 1km away from the DSLAM.

I mean, if you live in bumfuck nowhere, it just isn't in the ISP's interests to spend thousands of dollars on connecting your single hut with fiber.