You know, a Linux Touchscreen Interface still exist. While

File: poky_web-1.png (51KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 640x480px

>>61088771

File: ss-sato.png (38KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 640x480px

>>61088782

>>61088771
nah.
Ubuntu Touch and KDE Mobile are becoming better at that, after some trimming.

File: poky_mines.png (14KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 640x480px

>>61088790

>>61088805
Ubuntu Touch has been axed and KDE Mobile hasn't seen any work since they did some mock-ups on how it could look.

Well, there is als Enlightenment Desktop used in Tizen and something basend on WebOS that was open sourced. However, something that isn't tied with android and java, can run in framebuffer and is overall tiny in requirements and ressources isn't avaible other than this.

>>61088862
>Ubuntu Touch has been axed
See UBports.
They've been revived by UBports and are doing things right:
-stable
-QT;
-Wayland;

https://ubports.com/blog/ubports-blog-1/post/stable-ota-1-halium-is-heating-up-convergence-works-37
>KDE Mobile hasn't seen any work since they did some mock-ups on how it could look.
Due to project halium, it's actually supported.

>>61088903
>I want to believe
In this regard, http://webos-ports.org/wiki/Main_Page is probably the most advanced and closest thing to a working mobile envrioment avaible, thats not android.

But from my point of few those don't work on a plain linux installation. They usually need closed source drivers, and are usually build specially for each single device. If it doesn't run on my n900 it's shit.

File: DBh-tlgUMAAuHJG.jpg (122KB, 1200x697px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1200x697px

>>61088972
still, it's impressive.