Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: annoyedpepe.jpg (20KB, 306x306px) Image search:
[Google]
20KB, 306x306px
>a well-established, trusted and stable company's browser
> transparent about how that they use targeted ads to make money
>"botnet botnet botnet!"
>some random open source piece of shitware browser programmed in god-knows-where
>somehow still exists despite having no apparent revenue model
>but they say on their home page that they "respect your privacy"
>"omg where can i download it! i can't wait to download gigabytes of kiddie porn because this rickety open source garbage with its source code on github will make me impervious to surveillance"
this is what freetards actually believe
>>
>>61055988
(((trusted)))
>>
>trusted
you couldn't possibly be talking about google
>>
>>61055988
yes, this is it: using shitty open source browsers has nothing to do with security. they are only used by fat neckbeard hipsters who just HAVE to be different. they use these shitty browsers purely so that someone may one day see them and ask about it. they live for this foot-in-the-door moment, so they can launch into their autistic tirade about how "jewgle" and "sjwfox" can't be trusted. it is their only reason to exist.
>>
Open source by definition means that you can look at the code yourself, so anyone can inspect the code for security issues and add to it yourself. So open source is slightly more trustworthy.
>programmed in god-knows-where
I hardly believe that the location of the developer concerns retards like you one single bit.
>>
>>61056016
>i download software from sources i don't know
you might as well just go on craigslist and asked to get fucked as hard as possible and specifically request that none of the dudes wear a condom
>>
>>61055988
>trusted
>transparent how they brainwash people and destroy the web with garbage like AMP
>>
>>61056036 Who gives a fucking shit if you don't know the source when you can see the actual fucking code!
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1