What does /g/ think of games/mods and game engines replacing

I can tell it's skyrim because the imperial army gloves

>>61055555
Unless you have a supercomputer thousands of times more powerful than Pixar's renderfarm that can render a raytraced frame in a matter of milliseconds rather than hours then no.

>>61055692
I can tell it's Skyrim because someone actually thought to make a fucking Imperial nipple and crotch plate mod

also. fuck off to /v/

>>61055714
I just recognize the crest, calm down faggot

File: 1498212512701.png (615KB, 2894x2300px) Image search: [Google]

615KB, 2894x2300px

>>61055692
Bummer. I thought that's a 3D porn.

>>61055555
The girl is wasted on the blurry outfit.

>>61056478
But Skyrim is porn.

>>61055555
>game engines replacing modeling software and rendering?

Do you think someone opens up the Skyrim Creation Kit and started modelling in it?

>>61056582
>blurry outfit.

The entire image is blurry.

Welcome to the Skyrim modding community. Install 200-500 porn mods and some grass mod that adds 5 million blades per square foot then slap on an ENB/Reshade that cranks saturation to 1500% and add an overblown depth of field with an f-stop at f/1.4

>>61055555
hopefully that isn't an example of what you think will be relevant, it looks like upressed dreamcast fmv

in general, though, most of what makes a game's 3d engine suitable for games is a focus on making smart sacrifices for realtime rendering and abstracted "good enough" physics. if/when we hit a computational breakthrough where realtime is not obviously distinguishable from prerendered, it's also a breakthrough where prerendered is not distinguishably slower than realtime, and we're more likely to see game logic grafted onto rendering software (easy, just feed it inputs) than a complete rewrite of any game engine to feature-match a photorealistic renderer.

>>61055555
/v/