Would you pay for a browser? Let's sat it provides the speed

No.

Was it open source? I use firecux because it's open source.

fuck no

>>61038742
If it was open source and just asked for donations maybe

>>61038757
>>61038764
Yes, 100 percent opensource.

>>61038742
Is there major continuing development to justify paying monthly? I'm not opposed to buying quality software, but renting it seems wierd.

i would pay up to 15 euro per month for a feature rich, highly customizable browser that is secure and has absolutely no tracking or ads.

>>61038742
12$ a year? I'd honestly question if I was being scammed, good things don't often come that cheap. But yes, I would pay that, as long I see trusted reviews of the service.

I'd probably pay a one time fee for it

If it was free software, sure
But if it was free software I'd rather just compile it myself.

>>61038742
No.

>>61038772
>100 percent opensource.
I'd just compile it myself then. I already do that with Chromium

Nobody would be stupid enough in this age to charge for such service. You put yourself in the firing line for lawsuits as soon as someone doesn't update out of incompetence and gets hit by an exploit on some porn site.

File: netscape.jpg (25KB, 250x215px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 250x215px

Both Netscape and Opera were pay for browsers and one point. They flopped against the "free" Internet Explorer.

>>61038742
Opera tried that and how it ended?

But now we have pateron and stuff. It could work. But you would have to cater to the most autiatic user base needs you cant even imagine. You cant beat googles ads. Normies simply doesnt care.

>it would have to run both on mobile and on various os and so on

>>61044891
Netscape was open sourced and led to Firefox.

I would happily pay $20 up front if it had all of Firefox's extensions and Chrome's speed, yes, buy I don't like subscriptionware.