FUCKING TRIGGERED Who the fuck hires these talentless, disre

Hilarious.
This just goes to show that lenovo has nothing but contempt for thinkpad loyalists.

>>61033658
More disappointed about how this guy can't even cross reference his own images against the shit he's reciting

>>61033619
What? There is no info on it in the article, apart from that it will (supposedly) happen.

>>61033747
holy shit kill yourself

>>61033868
Uh, perhaps my adblocker blocked the important bits? I actually block clickbait-tier sites so I had cnet disabled and only temporarily enabled it, it might've blocked some parts anyway.

>>61033891
No you are right

This article really is a poor recitation of David Hill's (already vague) blog post, it adds nothing to the retro ThinkPad topic

>Lenovo's thinkpad in 1992
>Lenovo's

Is this guy underage?

What it the reason of OP's autistic drivel?
Is it because of the "Lenovo Thinkpad 700C" instead of IBM?

So is it going to use the old style keyboard or not?

>>61034010
Nope, enjoy your chinklet with 0.1mm travel distance

>>61034025
>enjoy
You mean ignore? I will not even consider it at all if it does not have this

>>61033943
The 700C wasn't even close to the original thinkpad, too

>>61034010
Yeah, but it will have a shitty clickpad and will cost $4999.99

>>61034070
it's wrong on every level
i hope this guy gets fired

>>61034087
and 8/9 of a cent XD

File: 1489522659257.png (39KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 300x300px

>>61033619
>lenovo
>1992

>>61033619
Weren't you fucking autists raving over some sort of announcement for Lenovo bringing back something nostalgic from the past?

I'm sure I saw this in a couple threads a week ago.

>>61034551
are you blind

>>61033619
https://unvis.it/cnet.com/news/lenovo-confirms-that-a-retro-25th-anniversary-special-edition-thinkpad-is-on-the-way

if it doesn't have a 16:9 display and has a good keyboard I'm all in desu

>>61033619
Did he literally copy the article from PCWorld 2 years ago and pasted it on Cnet?

http://www.pcworld.com/article/2941352/lenovos-proposed-thinkpad-retro-is-like-stepping-back-into-1992.html

>>61034792
no http://blog.lenovo.com/en/blog/retro-thinkpad-its-alive/

>>61033658
What goes to show that though? There is 0 information in the article.

Dramapost?
Keep drama posts off /g/ please.

/Thread

>>61034847
You're fucking dense
Do you enjoy thoughtless shitposting on "news" websites?

File: 6KrwQhKv4UXGP57DJLx1oi3Bv.jpg (27KB, 600x402px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x402px

>>61033619
it could be worse you know
at least they didn't try a half-assed throwback to the actual first Thinkpad that was balls deep in the first wave of the pen computing meme

lenovo hates thinkpad purists. they're going to come out with garbage as a slap in the face

>>61034863
Why should I care what gets posted on "news" sites? There is no important information presented.

>>61034922
but can we really blame them, most of them nowadays are just angry second-year CS undergrad hipsters trying to look brand conscious that don't even buy their hardware new anyway

File: 1497959129323.jpg (82KB, 699x458px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 699x458px

>>61033619
if it's 4:3 i'll buy it.

why the fuck don't laptop manufacturers offer different aspect ratios? i want a business subnotebook to look at spreadsheets and documents not fucking anime

>>61035002
they must figure that most of us who would like a nice compact and square little brick that doesn't dominate an airplane tray or cramped desk already fell for the tablet meme

or they're just overly jewish about it and most people just decided to roll with it

>>61034503
I hope OP gets fired

>>61035002
What's going on in that picture?

File: BYTE-1993-01_0093.jpg (1MB, 2312x1620px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2312x1620px

>>61034070
yeah it was, you mongoloid, the 700C was the high end of the first generation of IBM portables to carry that name along with the 700 and 300, while the 700T existed a short while before but was rebranded after the fact

it also was indeed pretty close to IBM's original "Thinkpad", unless you're really fucking autistic enough to consider the totally unrelated PS/2 N33, L40SX or fucking Convertible to be "ThinkPad" systems by virtue of being portable and having an IBM logo on them

>>61035130
Sean Penn, ex wife, and daughter's bf.

>>61033619
I don't understand what you're talking about. There's no real info about it

>>61035002
nonstandard display sizes are expensive
people without autism have realized that a 16:9 screen is dual 8:9 screens if you tile, which is a pretty good size for word processing or terminals - even you say "little square"
media consumption is a major use for actual business travelers who want to watch a stored movie on a flight rather than paying the airline $10, and watch xhamster in their hotel room rather than paying the hotel $15

>>61035188
>the whole thing weighs only 7.6 pounds

IBM late 80s to late 90s design aesthetic > Apple design aesthetic (all eras)

>>61035291
>$4,350
>1992
>literally a $7,600 laptop
>"why aren't they built like this anymore", sper/g/s post from their $500 chinkboxes while whining about (((overpriced $1,299))) macbooks

File: mfw.jpg (448KB, 2200x1580px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 2200x1580px

>>61035002
i really wish chapo had chopped up that faggot and left his head at the US embassy gates

File: s3600.png (509KB, 520x480px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 520x480px

>>61035291
but it's not really all that bad when we take a moment to consider that these things were probably facing off with 16 pound shitheaps like pic related and their poor lanklet operators carting them around from meeting to meeting
>>61035347
they're both pretty good in their own ways, Apple systems were way higher end early on too

>>61034751
21:9 laptop now kek

>>61035002
Surface laptop does

>>61035356
>not understanding economies of scale and innovations drastically reducing manufacturing costs
what's your defect?

>>61036836
that's 3:2

ITT: Anons speculate a product that they have no fucking clue about.