Daily reminder that pic related and the (((FSF))) killed every chance of Linux becoming relevant in the desktop.
What's wrong with GTK? I'm waiting for you to confirm that you're an idiot.
>>61031957
KYS you clueless piece of shit
>>61032179
>inb4 someone post GNUnet-gtk
>>61032179
Nigger tier devs that develop for their ego instead of for the users. Their choices are questionable for the basic and for the power users alice.
>>61032179
GTK is cure evil. Why? Because each version is completely incompatible with previos versions. This means programs that use 1 are fucked. It means most modern distros have both 2 and 3 installed. Some programs use 2 and some use 3 so you have no visual consistency: looks like crap.
>>61031957
you're not wrong
>>61031957
GTK and Gnome are highly autonomous and literally do what they want
>>61031957
GTK was a fucking mistake, being able to target OSX and Linux using Qt with minor changes would've been killer
it would be worthwhile to port vala to Qt, for now everyone relevant just bundles/statically links to Qt
>>61034848
What is Red Hat?