>20C difference between cores on a Devils Canyon CPU with

I have the 4670K and it's even worse. Can't even reach 4.4 past 1.35v and get idle temps of 50C.

File: peter north visits intel fabs.jpg (34KB, 680x510px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 680x510px

>>61027779

>>61027779
4790k in the only decently build Intel CPU in last 5-6 years

>>61027883
as clearly evidenced by my screenshot
I shouldn't have sold my 2600K so soon.

>>61027913
Your screen shot proves absolutely nothing.

>>61027961
how is nearly 20C difference between the hottest and coldest core nothing? It didn't happen on my 2600K.
4790K is not even noticeably faster than 2600K, which is why I said I shouldn't let myself be memed so easily/

File: toothpaste inside.jpg (31KB, 630x372px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 630x372px

>>61028019
It's what happens when the factory workers don't apply the toothpaste evenly enough, or it doesn't even cover part of the die fully.

>>61028019
I don't know what voltage, cooling system, or load that was tested at. You Devil canyon fags are about as insufferable as 2500k fags.

>>61028159
>voltage, cooling system, or load
neither of this matters in this case
unless you think I cut my cooler in half and cooled only half of the CPU, but I'm not THAT retarded.

>>61028019
The best part is that SB chips draw more power at the same clock speeds and they run cooler. Thanks Intel for using jizz instead of solder.

>>61027779
so, if my cores are the same temperature (+-3 degrees), does this mean CPU's cooling is well built?

>>61028197
It's pretty fucking relevant if you undervolted your clc loop and ran the co-sign bench for 20 seconds. Yes, people will think you are retarded for nit buying a 5820k, or thinking a 2 year difference should be able to come up with a new blazing fast Arch that's fukin suuuppperrrr blazun fast or whatever. Intel recycled the core Arch for 9 generations, and you were gullible enough to but two (2) of the SAME cpu, and then wonder why you can't tell much difference. Your retarded.

>>61028409
It means the cooling between the die and IHS isn't fucked up.

>>61028414
>Your retarded
my retarded what?
though admittedly I am at least partially retarded for believing what /g/ says and getting memed into Devils Canyon
fucking shills

>>61027779
Not sure what your issue is.

My 4790k cores are all within like 3C if eachother under full load, and I have a stable 4.7ghz @ 1.29 volts.

>>61028446
good, because i heard some people bitching about skylake having some snot for temp exchange. Doesn't seem to affect it that badly

File: pic_disp.php(2).jpg (44KB, 650x419px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 650x419px

>>61028507
It's the other way around, faglord

>>61028633
what?

>>61028507
Nah, it still has jizz TIM, but it was applied evenly across the die. You would still see a big drop in temps if you delidded it.

>>61028666
Skylake took the ivr's off the die, improved the tim, and went to 14nm all in a effort to reduce temps.