What's so bad about webkit? I don't understand how

Because unless it's overwhelmingly unpopular it's a botnet.

>>61006092

>it's overwhelmingly unpopular.

Could you try any harder to be inaccurate? Come on, you know this is straight up wrong.

>its a botnet

Can you prove this? Or are you just saying that cause it's not 'open-sores'. Can we ever stop pretending that open source matters? It is not like you retards actually understand programming, so why do you pretend that you inspect the software you use for 'botnets'?

>>61006042
It takes hours to compile because lol C++. Otherwise it's fine, I guess.

>>61006633
> it's not 'open-sores'
?

>>61006042
It's behind gecko and its fork blink in terms of features but keeps up in terms of bloat and a nightmare to compile.

>>61006633
Webkit is open source...

>>61006042
Its the No. 1 source of exploits into any console or phone not updated for half a year

I really like it

>tfw Blink and WebKit are fork of a KDE HTML engine from 1998

In the words of the wise from console gaming
"If it has WebKit, it will be exploited."

If you make any system, do not use WebKit. You are 100% guaranteed to have your system compromised for it. It's all a matter of when.

File: 1472819273161.png (107KB, 1378x1008px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1378x1008px

>>61006042
>What's so bad about webkit?
Nothing. It's the best. Lightweight, fast, stable, just werks.

>I don't understand how something that powers the most popular web browsers manages to be hated so much by /g/
Webkit powers Safari. Safari doesn't run on Linux and Windows so all the /g/ pajeets are mad.