Why isn't anyone talking about this? https://www.neweg

>>61004099
>trying to shill
>doesnt know about rcom tools

File: screenshot-www.newegg.com-2017-06-21-03-09-05.png (19KB, 739x452px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 739x452px

HOUSEFIRE

>>61004218
start naming 'em

all i know is AMD is/was HIRING for people to develop for them

all the big libraries (on python at least, because that's all I follow) pytorch, tensorflow, etc. don't give a shit about AMD and opencl shit. and if you're a big boy working at google you're going to be using their TPUs anyways.

Are they going to tell us what advantage it has over the gaming version? I'm not buying one unless they list the specs of the gaming version and software differences.

>>61004099
Beats the shit out of the P5000 at half the price.

>>61004420
source

File: 14624568450319.jpg (941KB, 1906x1536px) Image search: [Google]

941KB, 1906x1536px

>intelbabies are still butthurt over i9

>>61004264
un informed shills are the best version of shills

http://gpuopen.com/hip-to-be-squared-an-introductory-hip-tutorial/
https://github.com/ROCm-Developer-Tools/HIP

>>61004428
Really? The P5000 is basically a 1080 with more VRAM and lower clocks. (also, only 8.9 TFLOPS)

Vega Frontier will definitely beat a 1080 by a considerable margin, so it will also beat a P5000.

I'm in the beta for their GPU renderer for blender. It's quite good but with no info on how vega performs in it not buying.

File: quadro.png (398KB, 2598x1454px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 2598x1454px

>>61004445
But the drivers of the Quadro and Geforce are not the same...

File: sqSFmXVI9t3V1sshTNPZzRykNWPWBo5ki6NbHkv6QQg.png (177KB, 1024x427px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1024x427px

>>61004454
i will have one in my hands in some days hopefully i will get a nice idea of it

>>61004461
>But the drivers of the Quadro and Geforce are not the same...
Vega Frontier is effectively a FirePro.

>>61004436
so it just hacks CUDA shit to C++?

where's muh native tools????

File: 2017-06-21-03-43-24.png (180KB, 795x1513px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 795x1513px

>>61004466
>If we take a look at some benchmarks posted by PCPerspective a while ago, the Quadro P5000 (a GTX 1080 equivalent card) manages to score 152.92 in Catia. Vega scores 135.75 in comparison which is near the P4000, that is a cut down GP104 SKU. In Solidworks test, the Quadro P5000 scores 168.11 versus 114.88 on Vega. The score is even lower than Quadro P2000 which is based on a cut down GP106 die

>As you can see, the Quadro cards have the best optimization on pro workloads so AMD once again picked the best case scenario for them by comparing their best pro card to NVIDIA’s best non-Quadro card

The drivers of the Geforce are not the same

>300w

>>61004499
man you must be very dense if you cant use few clicks to see all the tools on the left side of gpuopen...

>>61004253
Thats for the air version which apparently throttles the fuck out of it self, it is 375 watts TDP for the liquid cooled version.

>>61004693
Will anyone release a water block for the air cooled version? Those closed loop coolers on this and the fury x are annoying when you already have a loop.

File: 1490922440830.jpg (25KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 640x480px

Look at all this damage control.

https://twitter.com/bkrunner/status/877321556782743553

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE

>>61005047
He is going to announce resignation?

>>61004434
I've never understood why people bother to create a new hat for AMD/Wojak, but apparently changing the beanie into a kippah for Intel is too hard.

>>61005060
maybe a new line of kitchen appliances

Intel Furnace Inside™

File: Capture.png (237KB, 1078x464px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1078x464px

>>61004514
Is Titan even supposed to be for workstations?Because I only see shit about gaming on their website.

>all this amdtard damage control and moving the focus on intel
lmao

>>61005062
That'd make no sense. Intel consumers are dumb goyim, not God's chosen people.

>>61005076

They are gimped workstation cards. But they are used professionally for deep learning AI stuff.

>>61005062
Because not everyone is an autistic cunt like you?

>>61005246
I thought the platform war wojaks were a caricature of the platform rather than that platform's users.

>>61005271
What did I ever say to you that makes me deserve that kind hostility? Do you feel good about what you just said?

>>61004099
>FP32: 13.1 TFLOPS
>FP16: 26.2 TLOPS
Who da fuck uses half precision floating point?
Are they trying to make people think those are double and single precision scores?

>>61005366
AI apparently uses FP16. One thing I'm not sure about is can Vega stream data from system ram for 3d raytracing? Existing cards you're limited by whatever fits in VRAM. If the new memory controller can do that it's a big GPU rendering bottleneck solved.

File: 1454039405929.png (49KB, 808x805px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 808x805px

>>61004264
>tensor

File: 1454285919228.jpg (1MB, 5000x5000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5000x5000px

>>61004465
>buying a $2000 gpu

>>61005625
well why not at least i will be one of the few that will actually HAVE one to bench and shit even with pro drivers the rest can fuck off by the miners

vega is DOA
amdtards can't accept that they lost the gpu war

>WHY ISN'T THIS WORKSTATION CARD CHEAP AND MADE FOR MUH VIDYA?!

/v/ pls go and stay go.

>>61006724
>pascal rolls out
>amd is kill
no

>>61006724
Just like R300 was DoA before it rolled out and gassed the entire GF4 lineup.

>>61006804
R300 was competing vs FX, retard. Vega is literally later than FX and has underwhelming performance.

>>61006860
>underwhelming performance
Please show me the benchmarks.

>>61006868
AMD still refusing to releasy any numbers considering how they did ryzen, says enough. They know vega is shit and are quit about it.

>>61006890
Please show me the benchmarks.

>>61006894
When bencmarks asr out just don't come with the amdtard excuse that vega was meant to be shit.

>>61006908
Please show me the benchmarks or at least say why the fuck do you think it'll be shit besides
>reeeee mommy ebil poojeet is not showing me gaymen bega reeeee

>>61006928
It will be at 1080 levels, year later and expensive for its performance.

>>61005366
>Who da fuck uses half precision floating point?
Miners.

>>61005198
>amdtard
>>61006724
>amdtard
>>61006908
>amdtard

Gee I wonder why nobody takes the dipshit Nvidia cocksucker seriously?

>>61006942
Why do you think so besides
>reee ebil poojeet is not showing me gaymen begaaa
?

>>61004420
At what?

>>61006968
because they pull the same CF shit like polaris and don't show any numbers

>>61006860
if you havent realised that amd is sandbagging you need to see a doctor...

>>61006989
Just wait and believe in the toilet fairy.

>>61006986
Dude they actually showed the numbers for Polaris. And yet you know nothing about Vega. At all. You can only autistically screech.

>>61006986
amd showcases 2 vega pro cards on rendering to showcase their I/O on EPYC
random /g/ shill thinks they actually benched vega

>>61007012
Hey, they played Prey on CFed Vegas. It teared like shit.

>>61007019
it was a projector you moron

>>61007010
>>61007012
arguing with someone straight from r/amd is useless

>>61007039
>inaudible autistic screeching
Don't worry, NVIDIA won't release another dustbuster. Your house is safe.

>>61007010
Yeah polaris was actually worse and misleading.
CF polaris at 50% GPU utalization matched 1080 in asehs of amd. Retards shitted the board how single polaris at 100% would match 1080.

File: saya.jpg (145KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1280x720px

>>61007068
>retards pulling shit out of their asses
Never happened before.

>>61007092
Whatever you say amdrone.

File: 1491104961766.jpg (43KB, 688x456px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 688x456px

>>61007100
Wow great arguments, pal.

>>61007092
AMD were clearly impying it, otherwise they won't put gpu utilization and will only show fps.

>>61007039
well yeah its known when you run out of facts
or to put it more simple
when you are a fag that shills without any proper understanding of technology the rest are simply either /r/amd or shills or anything else

File: Tin_foil_hat.png (131KB, 249x238px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 249x238px

>>61007120
Lots of paranoia and assuming AMD is trying to decieve people. You got your hat on tight enough?

File: AMD-Radeon-RX-480-Crossfire-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1080.jpg (78KB, 932x520px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 932x520px

>>61007141
>no arguments

>>61007141
they did a fine job trolling the industry about ryzen so far

>>61004465
Let us know it's hash rate vs power usage. I really hope it is shit for mining so availability is good for gaming.

>>61007351
knowing that it will have more ACE's and bigger wavefront?

dont count on it this shit will be even better than a 295x2 i bet my ass on this

and if im true well better preorder

>>61007166
>amdtards laugh at nvidia graphs
ayyy lmao

>>61006573
>the rest can fuck off by the miners
isn't HBM bad for mining? AMD might have pretty great consumer launch, considering everything else is simply not in the stores

>>61007572
what is bad is that you cant overclock it to a decent level..

if hbm2 is able to get memory overclocked well just imagine what the hbm can do with that massive bandwidth

fukken gayman when

>>61007627
>you cant overclock it to a decent level..
that's irrelevant, watch and see how OCing dies in next couple years due to better tech process
7nm will simply murder OC and run full throttle out of box finally
better have stable fq. out of box than throttling mess good for 3 minute benchmarks

>>61007627
Bandwidth is useless if the shaders don't need it, it's literally a number and nothing more once the ALUs are fed.

christ, it'll take fucking September for that card to be released.

>>61007572
HBM is bad because it capped at 4gb and Ethereum is extremely vram dependent.

HBM2 on Vega will have 8gb and 16gb versions.

>>61007714
yeah why you think amd increased the number of ACE engines?

>release date 7th January 2017
>only allows you to preorder
what did he mean by this???

>>61007750
There's no proof that they did and those have nothing to do with the fucking bandwidth requirements of the shaders.