How many github watches/stars do you have to have to not be shit?

>>60997681
I have 600+ stars and 60+ watchers on a repo and that's faggot tier.

>>60997811
probably bots like fake IG followers. They had an article about this in the paper

>>60997897
mine is a pretty well known project, mostly people who star it to bookmark it and then use it later on or forget about it, thats why the watch:star ratio is too high. Only 14 contributors too.

>>60997681
Two stars because my colleagues are nice sometimes.

Also I have no idea how or why people would come to my repositories unless they have very specific python-related interests.

>>60997933
14 / 60 = .25 is pretty good ratio though

>>60997681
Just assist Godot engine development instead.

>>60998598
its inferior

reminder github is a fucking cesspool of sjw nonsense

https://github.com/subgraph/oz/issues/72

File: random-43.jpg (69KB, 900x703px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 900x703px

I have two stars on my only project that wasn't for University
https://github.com/zero808/ya4cid

>>60999181
Kudos for building something in racket; every time I take a look at the language I find it impossible to stop thinking in OO and embrace functional.

>>60997681
Max stars I have in a project is 2 and just me as a watcher.

It's good to be a nobody in a SJW infested website.

>>60997681
My top project has 36 stars and 2 watchers not counting me, couple other ones have ~10.

>made code for a robot for a competition
>let it be public because there's no way we'll do great
>turns out we actually do amazing and get 3rd in the world
>no watches or stars (other than me and the other programmers)
feels bad man