Vega AIB Cards Shipping In Early August – Competitive Only

>>60975464
>wccftech

>>60975464
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>60975464
When the June 5th rumors turned out not to be true I just got a used Fury X. It's not too far behind a GTX 1070 for only $300. Hopefully Vega is good enough to warrant reselling.

File: giphy (2).gif (888KB, 500x286px) Image search: [Google]

888KB, 500x286px

>>60975464
>Source: Some shitty chinese rumor mill
Just WCCFturd being WCCFturd I guess.

>>60975877
It's like when they were predicting RX 480's running at 1600Mhz all over again. This site is pure click bait trash.

File: 1481784777457.jpg (15KB, 348x350px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 348x350px

>>60975464
>>60975464
>shitty faux brushed metal instead of glorious plain plastic

How did they fuck this up so badly?

>>60975964
I bet you like safety glass too, peasant.

File: amdvega.jpg (156KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 633x758px

>>60975464
wait for navi

>>60975903

So vega is going to be even worse than what the rumor mill says? Sounds about right for AMD: overpromise, underdeliver.

>>60976044
You like Wccfshit so much, you should just go there. Forever. The comment section is already filled with blitering retards, so you'll fit right in.

>>60975708
>>60975903

The source is hwbattle thought

>>60975464
>Competitive Only With The GTX 1080
That's not what the article says. It's the title, but clearly it's clickbait. The sentence they're basing their title on is:
>Finally, HWBattle reports that Vega will be faster than the GTX 1080, although they did not offer much detail beyond that. As is with any rumor, which this report definitely qualifies as, take this information with a grain of salt.
So they're saying it's at least as strong as a 1080.

File: 1445918329361.jpg (168KB, 664x441px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 664x441px

>>60976044
>he read the comment section in news