sup /g/ AppImage shilling. Why does AppImage have not unified

>>60968747

a universal repositories of just Appimages would be perfect

>>60968766

this, but who will be responsible for its security and fidelity?

I bet Google

>.exe
Jelly?

>>60968747
- They're far larger than the binaries shipped by distos now
- Distros can't apply patches specific to their distro
- The current system works fine

>>60968848
They don't work any different from Unix executables. If some shared library as a deendency isn't there, it isn't there - then the distributor needs to provide it.

>>60968869

>The current system works fine

kek, tell that to Arch users.

>>60968747
>Why does AppImage have not unified the different Linux distros out there?
Thankfully, but I picture it will soon.

You can blame RedHat for shilling its Flatpak shit and Canonical their Snappy. Otherwise AppImages are just perfect.

Also >>60968766 would be damn awesome.

>>60968747
Flatpak does this too

>>60968953
RedHat shill detected. Reminder that lennartware is why we can't advance.

>>60968922

I hope the Flatpak and Snappy current propaganda ends with AppImage getting more known and as a new standard.

>>60968747
Because it still uses the System ~/.config folder.

>>60968747
> JUST WHY FUCKING NOT?!
Because linux "apps" can run on any distro anyway, the difference is in configs placement, but it's possible to recreate them by hand.