Can your HIGH-END PC play this video in 8k with no stutter ?

Forgot link, silly me
https://youtu.be/1La4QzGeaaQ

>>60964274
my 700$ pc can do it, but the cpu hit's about 65-80% usage

>>60964274
Seems like your network would bottleneck you before your hardware.

1600X and Fury X it runs fine until it has to load

>>60964399
this
>>60964397

>>60964274
thats a png file you fucking retard

>>60964399
50Mbit download, so that shouldn't be a problem.
>>60964442
I'm sorry it loads slowly for you.

>>60964274
Jesus shit. I can't even play the 4k without noticable lag.

i5 4960 with a 980 Ti

File: file.png (58KB, 417x413px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 417x413px

Can't even play 720p 60fps Tbh.

>>60964274
Sandy Bridge i3, no graphics card, lags like a fuck, and takes ages to load.

Can't. Laptop i7 from 2014 using Linux.
>tfw your laptop will be obsolete in 5 years or so

>>60964519
But it runs 1080 60 smoothly, and since my monitor is 1080...

>>60964274
No issues here, perfectly smooth
1700x and gtx 1080

File: Screenshot 2017-06-18 16.36.06.png (58KB, 953x575px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 953x575px

>>60964473
I get a pretty consistent 60mb download speed and I still can't play this at 8k without it needing to load every five seconds

ITT: Inferior Browsers
Edge literally does not have this problem.

Works fine here on Debian 9, proprietary drivers on an NVIDIA 1050 Ti.

File: Screenshot_27.jpg (114KB, 461x740px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 461x740px

>>60964280
>>60964274
It runs fine but...
caysed sunday

what game is this >>60964274

>>60964274
1 dropped frame at the begining else completly smooth. Around 7-10% CPU
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.8 Ghz

>>60964613
it's called real life with HDR and color corrections

>>60964274
4770k gtx 1070 works perfectly tbqh. You need higher internet speeds I have 500 mbps it uses like 180 mbps

>high end pc

joke's on you, i'm shitposting from my $100 X220

File: Clipboard01.png (149KB, 880x627px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 880x627px

>watching videos through a browser

>>60964637
see, I even downloaded the whole thing, and the playback was even worse on vlc.

>>60964683
It works fine on powerdvd too

>>60964635
what do i search for on steam ?

>>60964631
What GPU?

>youtube-dl -f 'bestvideo,bestaudio' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1La4QzGeaaQ

It's 2.7 gb, pretty small for 8K@60fps

For some reason edge seems to have better performance than chrome for video.

I believe edge use proper hardware acceleration.

>>60964538
Downscaled 4k/8k still looks better on 1080p monitors.

>>60964637
>4770k gtx 1070 works perfectly tbqh.

How? My 4970k is choking in this, playing about 1 frame a second with a 98% CPU usage.

>>60964813
Try with MS edge.

>>60964759
Edge is unironically one of the best performance browsers right now, it just sucks in every other area and has no addons.

6600k goes 100% on this, it doesn't make sense, I think my hardware acceleration is messed up

>>60964827
It's had extensions for a while

>>60964613
minecraft

>>60964473
300Mb/s, pretty quick.

File: chrome_2017-05-02_02-51-12.png (3MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1200px

>>60964274
This is my 1700 at stock, with no GPU support.

When chrome is open for a long time it drops frames more often, but I fresh open of chrome it doesn't. This also might be do not down to the fact that I have an Nvidia GPU in there too, I might turn hardware acceleration off.

>>60964280
>>60964922
I'm the towns 8K guy, I just try doing the Peru 60 frames per second and 8K but my Internet can't buffer it and when it hits the buffer and adds drop frames. When it has a buffer doesn't drop any frame so it seems to be more of a buffer issue than my computer can't handle it.

>>60964728
GTX 1070

>>60964274
>2GB
I don't want to sit back and wait as the video loads. Fuck that shit.

t. Ryzen R7 1700X + RX 570

>>60964274
Why can't Youtube buffer for shit?
It says it has a 9s buffer and then it stops to buffer.
Fucking shit. Complete shit.

>>60964274
Does it make a difference what display I have? I'm using 2 QHD monitors.

>>60964672
>using MPV
actually why?
There are way better alternatives

>>60964852
in 4K

>>60965103
it doesn't for me. I have a 1080p monitor and a 4k tv and it runs the same on both.

>>60965100
DASH playback only buffers a portion of the video based on what timestamp you start at. Its total fucking shit, I don't know why they use it.

>>60965136
I think you are mistaken

>>60964672
what app are you using for this?

>>60964498
Upgrade it to a X9100 for $10.

>>60964274
I5-4460 here, i can do it.
20Mbps is not enough to watch it tho.

Anyone have a link to a download of a clip? Youtube through a browser runs high CPU to begin with.

>>60965219
I use the Open With extension with mpv+Youtube-dl

>>60965293
Why not just download it from Youtube?

1080p/60 seems to be the limit for this i7 M620 / NVS 3100M and internet connection.

File: Clipboard01.png (102KB, 1087x1003px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1087x1003px

>>60965293
download it from youtube with youtube-dl

File: Screenshot from 2017-06-18 18-33-06.png (963KB, 1928x1079px) Image search: [Google]

963KB, 1928x1079px

>>60964274

No stutter famalam.

i7 6700k
32gb ram
Samsung 950 pro M.2
Very old ATI HD2400 Pro GPU

Manjaro with Firefox 53

File: imrs.php.jpg (380KB, 1484x989px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 1484x989px

>>60964399
The 8k file is 2.7GB and comes out to a data rate of 68.6 Mbps. Along with the fact that Youtube is an extremely popular site, know for ISPs having peering issues to the site due to the high demand.

>>60965395

And a 1000/100 Fiber connection.

>>60964274
4690k here.

Plays 4k no problem, 8k plays, but it's unwatchable, about 15fps.

>>60964482
Should have got the unlocked version m80.

>>60964274
These Far Cry skins gitting gud

File: 1445108066614.jpg (9KB, 246x227px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 246x227px

>open it in opera
>CPU shoots to 90% usage, GPU (1080 ti) to 30%
>open it in Edge
>CPU goes to 12%, GPU sits at 1%
So this is the power of Kaby Lake (tm) hardware decoding?

>>60965418

Where can you get the FPS on this video ?

>>60964280
>6700k & 1070, 16GB RAM
>Back to using 2mbps internet
Yep this will take awhile

>>60964274
FX-8320 and 480RX stutters on 8k, plays 4k fine.

8k takes a stupid amount of bandwidth, resmon is showing me tapping out at 60mbps which is probably bumping up against comcast's connection to google.

ryzn 1700
gtx1070
play fine in mpv
stutter with firefox

File: speedtest2.png (22KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 350x200px

>>60965494
cont.

100mbps connection, basically maxing out my fastethernet switch.

File: Screenshot_1.png (30KB, 532x455px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 532x455px

Of course.

>>60965460
I judged it by eye.

You could possibly record the fps by downloading the video, and using RivaTuner.

>>60964274
i can't load the video at all

>>60965573

I had zero stutter or lag.

And the "stats for nerds" doesnt tell you or I do not know how to extrapolate the information.

>>60965573
>I judged it by eye.

>>60964806
4K and 8K downscales look identical to me. ANd not much different from 1080.

>>60964806
2k looks the same as the 4k/8k downscales.

>>60964274
This is also kinda dumb because some of the people will get H.264 and others will get VP9 with H.264 being much easier to decode, at different frame rates two..

i5 2500k with rx480, 8gb ram. 8k is lagging with 100% cpu usage. 4k works fine with 90-98% cpu usage.

>>60965618
Under 20fps is really easy to gauge.

>Tfw used up all my data playing a stupid video on YouTube.
Thanks anon.

File: 1497446162497.jpg (14KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x225px

>>60965317
>FF 57 will kill this
What now?

File: Clipboard01.png (19KB, 915x236px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 915x236px

>>60966026
This
And wait to see if a compatible extension is possible
I'll never go back to watching videos in a browser

>>60964274
Jewtube won't let me chose a resolution higher than 720p

>>60966173
The extension part is actually pretty easy. But the user has to create application manifest to register the program with firefox and point the manifest to launcher script like this one:

#!/bin/bash
len=`head -c4 | od -An -t d4 | tr -cd [:digit:]`
url=`head -c"$len"`
url=${url//\"/}
mpv "$url"

File: 1476154634018-pol.jpg (34KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 657x527px

>>60964565
>mfw edge is limited to only 1080p video.

i5-2500k
Can't get past 1440p. 1440p works perfectly, but with bigger resolution picture is freezing on first frames while sound is playing as usual.
Downloaded 8k version and got 1 frame per second.

>>60965609
It tells you dropped frames. Meaning if it says 0/X you have dropped 0 frames, but if it says 100/X you have dropped 100 frames. It doesn't reset when you change resolution so it's best to set it and then refresh the video.

6600k is good enough they said

>>60966471

all the dropped frames on 8k kek

>>60964274
Corelets cannot play this video.

>>60964951
>>60964728
Does any GPU do VP9 hardware acceleration for 8k?

>>60964274
yes, but my internet can't load it

>>60967587
Don't think so. I know my RX460 has 4k HEVC and 4k VP9 decoding. Same for the Nvidia 1060 and higher.

7700k @ 4.7
32GB DDR4 3000
GTX 980Ti Classified
Google Fiber 1000/1000 Mbps


stutters like a bitch

>>60964565
>>60966274
microsoft knows their limits and doesn't even try

>>60966197
probably don't want you to cause an intel housefire(tm)

What the fuck are you guys doing wrong?

2500k and 670 running macOS Sierra, plays just fine.

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-18 at 10.14.23 PM.png (748KB, 887x518px) Image search: [Google]

748KB, 887x518px

>>60968081

File: 1482087654774.jpg (80KB, 640x539px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 640x539px

I can only play it in 4k, but seeing as I've got a i7-2640M with the integrated GPU, I'm not unhappy.

FX8320 can't play it at 8k.

File: sp00ky.png (36KB, 670x536px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 670x536px

Nope, I get mad suttering in Chrome. Opened it in Edge, was only able to set it to 1080p and don't feel like fucking around with it at all.

>>60968177
Somewhat surprised you can tolerate Windows on that.

>>60965317
Do you know about something similar for chrome? I mean it's easy enough to just copy the link and run in cmd but that would be easier

File: 8k.png (144KB, 291x291px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 291x291px

>>60964607
Works for me, time to trash your shitty browser anon.

>>60968190
His SSD probably helps a lot.

>>60964753
It's a 5 minutes video, how is that small at all?

>>60968190
Keep upgrading every year like the jews want you to, Anon.

>>60968215
I'm
>>60968149
I don't upgrade often at all.

>>60968208
for 8k it is small because youtube always has low bitrate

>>60968219
Do you use windows? The i7 920 is very similar to your CPU in performance. If you're unable to tolerate windows on your machine, there may be a problem.

>>60968278
I was unable to tolerate it, even when the machine was new. SSD and 16GB RAM helped, but I've been on Linux for years now.

File: Screenshot at 2017-06-18 22-36-50.png (23KB, 400x72px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 400x72px

1-2 fps on laptop with i7-6700HQ integrated graphics. tried converting the first 10 seconds to h264 but that didn't make much of a difference.

at least spectrum is getting closer to 1st world download speeds

>>60964274
my browser and monitor can't support this resolution so how would I ever know

>>60964274

i7 3930k @ 4ghz, takes it to 88% utilization on all threads

>>60964274
Had to reboot my computer because the thing froze.

File: 8k.png (3MB, 1781x971px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1781x971px

Barely hitting 30% CPU usage on Edge with the Xeon 1231-V3 which has slower clocks than the 4000 series i7s and doesn't have quicksync either.

Can't even do 4K in chrome without shit hitting the fan.

No dropped frames, no buffering at all. 100mbps FTTB here.

>>60967714
Does Chrome actually take advantage of it? I have an older GPU, so I have no idea.

>>60964280
Wonderful video, thanks!

I watched on a fifty dollar tablet and it was smooth as silk. Probably because the device automatically downsampling from 8K to 1080.

>>60968193
I dont think there is anything that works for chrome

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>60968546
Looks like it does on my RX460, with a six core FX-6300. For 4k VP9.

>>60966274
This. wtf?

>>60964274
>i7 6700k
>GTX 1080

4k was just fine, but 8k is too much.

>>60964274
>4670k 4.2ghz
>760gtx
>barely plays 4k h265 in dedicated player

Why are people so bad at setting things up?
Atom 330 + ION is enough for 1080P
Core 2 Duo/Quad with a proper GPU is good for up to 4K

It doesn't take "high-end" computers to "watch" high resolution videos.

To encode them is a whole nother story.

>>60969038
>proper GPU
gpu video decoding outside of wangblows os if pain in the butt

Firefox struggles to load the video for me. I noticed in the stats that it defaults to vp9, which would rape most CPUs.

The video ran flawlessly in 8k when run in H264+AAC on my filter-heavy mpv setup. Downscaling the video to 1080p makes it look incredibly sharp.

Ryzen 7 1700 + AMD RX 470

>>60964274
Fun fact
Everyone here's PC will be obsolete by the time 8k screens become affordable to even the upper middle class. So it doesn't matter.

>>60964557
isn't time warner now spectrum?

if it is you should call then and ask to switch over to the 100mb internet since that's their slowest speed now. shouldn't cost any difference either.

>>60964607
h264ify?

>>60964274
i7 7700k

yes but my net can't handle it

this is also probably the only time i've used my hardware for something modern and power consuming since I bought it

>>60964274
1.8MB/s download here
i5 3770k and a GTX 1050ti
I can play it smoothly but I have to wait the video to load because I'm also on
>wifi

>>60969196
I can usually average above 5MB/s transfer over Wifi (between wired computer to wifi computer) over N Wifi. Should not be a problem for you unless you have like no signal.

5820k and 1080 here, vivaldi stuttered like crazy, edge played it with no issue. neat

>>60969038
youtube uses CPU

4770K overclocked to 4.6 plays it fine, just had to wait for it to load. 150 down and it was stillsuper slow.

>>60964482
>>60964519
>>60964533
>>60964813
>>60964829
>>60965279
>>60965333
>>60965418
>>60965879
>>60966430
>>60966666
>>60967718
>>60968081
>>60968149
>>60968334
>>60968418
>>60968967
>>60968968
>>60969173
>>60969196
>corelets

Smooth and nice with overclocked FX-8350.

my GOD. I have a 10 year old shitty 1080p tv my pc uses, and the 4k version of the OP link is breathtaking. Was churning my cpu real good, and my gpu is broken, so I don't think it was helping much. God I can't wait for 4k/8k and HDR to be cheaper, along with rendering ability and bandwidth. I can get gigabit fiber though already ;)

fucking cryptominers, I want a midrange stopgap gpu for a while before I go full retard on a stupid expensive monitor/gpu

I'll let you know when I've finished downloading it in 3 hours.

>>60969038
>100% cpu usage

>>60964274
>8k
>fucking 4320p
Gotta love normies

>>60964274
Works fine, this shit isn't anything impressive.
FX 6350
R9 380
20MB/s (160Mbps) internet

>>60964683
what did you use to download it? i can't download anything beyond 4k non hfr.

>tfw can't even decode 1080p60 locally
>internet rarely goes above 1mbit

>>60971112
>>60964753
>youtube-dl

>>60971151
I just get "ERROR: requested format not available".

>>60970108

>Clocklets

Put ffmpeg.exe in your Youtube-dl folder and use 'youtube-dl -f 337+140 -o %(title)s'

That will grab you the HDR version if you have HDR capability.

>>60965395
>He says playing it at 4K

File: 1496821118476.gif (2MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x400px

>4320p
>downscaled to 480
>upscaled by 1.25

File: wtf.png (10KB, 627x59px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 627x59px

>>60964753
Holy shit, what is this?
I have a ~50Mb/s capped connection at uni but for some reason youtube-dl downloads this video at 100MB/s (800Mb/s).
I just downloaded 2.7GB in about 25 seconds.
I checked and the whole video is there, it's not some kind of bug.
Just did a speed test and am still only getting about 60Mb/s on the two sites I tried.
What the fuck kind of witchcraft is youtube-dl using and how can I get that kind of speed normally?

Yes but it only works in Edge, Chromium and Firecuck both cause a meltdown.

File: FUUU.png (566KB, 1524x504px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 1524x504px

Oh god send help

>>60970259
i7 6700k
R9 380 4GB SOC
7MB/s internet.

lol no. my internet would crap it self.

File: install gentoo.png (24KB, 610x424px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 610x424px

8k stutters, very laggy net-wise
4k streams perfectly, no stutter or net lag

>>60964274
It stutters, but I have 1280x1024 monitors, so I don't really care. You shouldn't test this with YouTube, though. Download the video and play it with a dedicated player.

>>60964274
it wont let me select 8k

>>60971396

Your uni probably has a whitelist that allows certain content to transfer as fast as possible. its highly likey your school could help host a youtube CDN too.

Intel Kaby Lake & Nvidia Pascal has full 8K HEVC Main10 & 8K VP9 hardware decoding, thats why there's no lag

AYYMD HOUSEFIRES have no vision and no forward thinking, they don't support 8K HEVC Main10 or VP9 hardware decoding

File: 4KtqxA8.png (50KB, 960x892px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 960x892px

Nvidia, forward thinking company with vision

File: 1496633909116.jpg (18KB, 240x280px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 240x280px

>>60964274
Runs perfectly on R5 1600 at stock clock

File: Based Nvidia Based PotPlayer.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>60964274
Is this supposed to be challenging?

>>60972122
>30fps
at least you tried