What does /g/ think of netsurf? It just needs JavaScript support

links2 framebuffer is better, it has graphics and javascript support, smaller than netsurf too

>>60957266
They removed JavaScript support from links2.

>>60957275
*cries*
links might work

Without Javascript it falls flat for many mainstream websites, but the resource usage is phenomenally low. Opening a single specific webpage that works without Javascript on Chromium takes around 250MBs of RAM while with Netsurf it's as low as 36MBs. I'd use it if Javascript was finalized somehow. Not because I like javashit, but because lazy devs don't want to implement proper fallbacks.

>>60958139
This

>>60958139
>devs are lazy if they don't create 2 versions of every page on their site just for the 0.001% of people who don't run javascript
Not every company has the money/resources to do so.

>>60957266
fellow links2 -g user, can confirm

>>60957266
Is either links2 or NetSurf, and knowing links2 already had the possibility of javascript I think is the winner.