https://www.pcper.com/news/Processo rs/Intel-Skylake-X-and-S

File: 1336848277534.jpg (4KB, 251x115px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 251x115px

>toothpaste.jpg

Does not matter when it burns your house down.

Yeah but 28 lanes

>>60917518
KNL mesh is still shit, anon.

File: TB2f4vIvrJmpuFjSZFwXXaE4VXa_!!2341477237.jpg (335KB, 1060x1047px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1060x1047px

>>60917518
It still scales like absolute shit.

> This would have an impact on the distance between every other column of cores, which would translate as more cycles required for horizontal data traversal. For instance, it likely requires one hop/cycle to move data vertically to the next core, but moving horizontally from the second column to the third column will likely require more cycles. We'll have to wait for more detail.

Bingbus 2.0.

>>60917518
>be Intel
>Fuck AMD is beating us
>Our bingbus arch is slow, what do we do
>Just connect EVERYTHING together and call it a new arch

AYYMD UTTERLY DESTROYED

ALL YOUR BINGBUS MEMES BTFO, SHOWS HOW IGNORANT AND CLUELESS YOUR MOTHERFUCKERS ARE WHEN IT COMES TO TECHNOLOGY

INFINIPOO FABRIC CAN'T SCALE AND WILL NOT SCALE AT ALL

>>60917626
It's bingbus 2.0. A mesh of bingbuses. Intel is not even trying to cure its bingbus fever.

>using the same interconnect used in Xeon Phi that's supposed to serve a shitload of low powered cores and scaling it to big bandwidth hungry cores

Oh this is hilarious.
Another bandaid

>>60917649
It's a mesh of bingbuses. The only advantage is removal of buffered switches. It still scales like absolute shit.
>>60917659
Literally
>make more bingbus

>>60917659
Intel is fucked until they launch a new architecture.

Considering Skylake-X is barely faster than Broadwell-E I think it's not working all too well.

Bingbus memers got a good tight slap across the face by Intel master race

>>60917700
It's literally
>make more bingbus

File: 1489329459496.png (1MB, 1228x1502px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1228x1502px

>>60917537
>>60917544
>>60917547
>>60917579
>>60917596
>>60917626
>>60917658
>>60917659
>>60917673
>>60917675
>>60917685

>>60917518
Unless i10 is killer 90% of enthusiasts will be buying a Ryzen for their next build.

>>60917739
Whenever someone replies to posts with a picture like that and no counter argument, it just reeks of damage control by someone who isn't even affiliated with the company. Goes for both sides of the CPU debacle. I always know to expect a bunch of these in each thread.