>browse chrome in incognito mode, not signed into anything,

>>60911549
Cookies, embedded files, temporary files, how about the fact that incognito mode is just a gimmick?

>>60911549
i mean, why the fuck were you using chrome in the first place? please use literally anything else

>>60911562
I thought the whole point of Incognito is it doesn't interact with your previous cookies, and doesn't save any cookies itself (once it's closed down)?

>>60911586
Obviously fucking not. It still doesn't have to be a cookie, it can be your search terms or browser history. Either way incognito mode is a fucking gimmick for retards who think they're protecting themselves when they aren't

>>60911597
I don't use it to protect myself, I only use it because I fucking hate that Chrome saves whatever you type into the search bar. I don't want to have it say 'SHEMALE GAPE ANAL' every time I type S to get to search something.

>>60911620
use a diferent browser for that shit
tor if you are paranoid

>>60911549
>he thinks incognito mode isn't just snake oil

>>60911586
Yes, but websites use MUCH more than cookies to track you.
Incognito mode is not about having a different online profile, it's about hiding what you're doing to other people who use the same computer.

OP, incognito mode is not a replacement for proper opsec.
Get noscript, get ublock, get requestpolicy, get a proper setup for blocking as much of their tracking garbage as possible.

>>60911549
>Using Google Botnet

your own fault

>>60911549
YouTube doesn't fill your recommendations based on anything else than cookies. They could (see >>60911877) and maybe internally they do track you, but publicly they just base the recommendations off your cookies.

So you probably clicked one of those "specific" videos in normal mode by accident

File: 1493767110996.png (64KB, 1021x476px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1021x476px

>botnet does botnet things