Who here /stock manipulation/? >Goldman Sachs rate AMD as

;^)

If you haven't noticed, the entire tech sector is down in premarket hours.

>>60910118
If you haven't noticed. EPYC stands to make 80% of Intel's server lineup useless. And AMD are about to drop news on it in 5 days.
The majority of Intel's income is from the server space. Anything AMD do there to outshine Intel is going to effect AMD's income massively.
Now is a time to buy for those who missed the $10 dip

How much money you need to get started in the stock market assuming you actually want to make a decent amount of money?

>>60910144
Tech stocks don't move on potential or actual quality of tech, anon.
I thought this was well known.

>>60910151
So, you're saying that when EPYC relieves Intel of billions in income from it's key earning marketplace, AMD's stock won't rise?

>>60910161
When did I say that? It hasn't happened yet, hence no stock change.

>>60910164
Not that anon, but you're thoroughly retarded if you think stocks only change for events that have happened already.

>>60910205
Tech stocks do, no results = no change, AMD is not moving from $12 until they can show they can do more than blow hot air.
That means EPYC contracts

>>60910241
>That means EPYC contracts
I see what you did there :^)

>>60910028
It is still a good time to buy AMD (or NVIDIA for that matter) the both are going to explode in the next 5 years because of the AI potential of GPUs.

>>60910146
2-3 million.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (27KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1440x1080px

>>60910028
$10.60? more like $0.11, amarite fellow consumer?