distros that bring NOTHING to the table >arch why installed

>>60883100
Any distro that's a fork/based on another distro

>>60883100
Because you can build your own distribution. Install xfce.

Arch was first released on 2002. Provide another binary-based, but with good src packages support, rolling-release with extended library of unofficial packages like AUR distro that wasn't made in recent 10 years.

>>60883100
>unstable
bullshit. dumb /g/ meme. I used for a year straight once, updated at least once a week. stop pretending you used arch.

Anything that is just a fork of another distro but with a different DE.

>>60883156
ubuntu

>>60883377
ordinarily I'd agree except Ubuntu has enough of an organization and funding behind to consider it an independent effort. it just werks

>>60883406
>no gentoo
uncultured swine. delete your post and sit in a corner for being a bad boy

What about distros that bring something to the table? That's a much harder one.

>>60883406
Lfs is pretty much everything

>>60883168
But anon, we're not 10 years ago

>>60883534
SHUT YER MOUTH

>>60883100
Manjuice Linux
>Arch, but worse

>>60883100
Arch is like Gentoo but binary based and forces you to use Systemd. So, they only share a similar install process.
Sent from my Gentoo

>>60883408
theyre just a downstream rebrand of debian, they dropped unity and are now a tech support company like redhat essentially

>>60883499
debian
redhat distros
raspirian or whatever its called

>>60883817
Lies

>>60883817

THIS

>>60883826
>just a downstream rebrand of debian

This shows how ignorant you are. Please stop posting.

>>60883817
This