http://www.businessinsider.com/sams ung-qh90-super-ultra-wid

>>60857389
Fucking garbage 19:9 or 4:3 or kys with these fucking trash ratios

First i wished it had g/free sync

But this type of monitor is for productivity and 144hz is very easy on the eyes. I think its proved fairly but I'll get one used in a year or two

>>60857425
16:9*

>watch a movie full screen
>literally half of the screen unused
pig disgusting

>$1500
>81 PPI
I'll take eight!

>>60857442
*priced

>>60857389
Makes a lot more sense to buy two 16:9 monitors. A screen that large is just a pain in the ass to manage with most desktop environments.

>>60857472
its not for lincucks senpai

>>60857389
even if i had that kind of money i wouldn't fucking buy that shit
most programs will scale like dogshit and i don't think anyone (even people who do tons of multitasking) need a screen that fucking wide
resolution > size

>Widescreen: 1 screen
>Ultrawide: 2 screens
>SuperUltraWide: 3 screens
Really gets the neurons firing...

If it has that split screen function it's ok. You get to enjoy 2 monitors with no border between them.

Windows and OSX dont even have decent tiling window managers, and console ports dont support ultrawide.
I would just go for a normal 4k 16:9.

File: 1491234149361.jpg (67KB, 653x653px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 653x653px

even samsung couldn't ship it without curving it

>>60857389
Using anything bigger than 1280x1024 is ricer bling shit

Does Window even support some sort of a proper tiling that you could set to 6:2 or 8:2 groups or do you have to manually drag and resize windows on such screens so they're all looking completely off?

>>60857389
>not even 32:15
into the trash it goes

I have 21:9 and to be honest I'd rather get a better 16:9.