>using veracrypt instead of truecrypt Why would anyone do

I don't know OP. Is veracrypt less used?

>>60792432
you're a fucking autist

>>60792432
VeraCrypt was audited too

did you mean LUKS?

>>60792432
>using any form of encryption
what are you hiding?

>>60793379
Your whore (mom) nudes.

>>60793379
This

>>60793379
Why would I tell you faggot?

Are you some top secret hacker spy from Russia? No? Then the Cia doesn't want any of your underaged loli porn you faggot.

I just use VeraCrypt so if my laptop gets stolen, none of my stuff gets sifted through by some nigger.

>>60792524
Not by a trustworthy source. QuarksLab have connections to the French intelligence services and could quite easily have intentionally not reported vulnerabiliities back, forwarding them on to said LEAs instead.

What is best encryption software for Windows?

>>60793415
GNU ÷ Linux

>>60792432
>not just using LUKS full disk encryption including /boot with libreboot

>>60793426
>encrypting anything ever
wow cia is sure gonna get me for pirating Deus Ex lol

>>60793438
My goal is to make mass surveillance more expensive.

>>60793453
How?

>>60793481
using tor for everything except 4chan, using 100% free software with no proprietary firmware or anything else, using QUBES OS, full disk encryption...etc.

I tried using truekrypt for the same reason as to if my shit gets stolen years ago (14-15 maybe) but I just couldn't figure out how to use the thing

>>60793481
Oh and I also don't use social media, don't have a cell phone and I pay for everything in cash.

>>60793617
Not 14-15 years ago, I was probably around that age at the time

LUKS VS VERACRYPT

>>60793453
I like your idea, anon. Don't listen to these bustas.

Is anyone going to provide a source for these audits?

>>60793771
>>60793771
https://www.nsa.gov/our-work/security-audits/truecrypt
https://www.nsa.gov/our-work/security-audits/veracrypt-1-18

>>60792432
except that root privilege exploit in the virtual drive mount

>>60793843
>The NSA audit found no evidence of deliberate backdoors, or any severe design flaws that will make the software insecure in most instances.

>>60793861
You mean these "audits"?
>>60793821
Just sage when you're shitposting next time.

>>60794021
>Just sage when you're shitposting next time.
"No!"

>>60793438
Fucking retard. There are hundreds of reasons to encrypt a volume. Like carrying confidential info from your company in a pendrive.

>>60794069
>carrying confidential info from your company
Reported to FBI.

So if I were to attempt truecrypt again, would I encrypt the whole HDD or folders?

>>60793379
Private data

>>60793453
>>60793765
yes i am agree with both of you.
and we all have to do it

>>60794144
you just create a file-based volume. They are the easiest to setup and they are also portable

>>60792432

Did we ever get the source code? Why did they shut everything down did we ever get an answer?

>>60793379
My Freedom cuck.

>TrueCrypt was audited and proven to have no vulnerabilies.

Wrong, CVE-2015-7358 and CVE-2015-7359 was found by Google Project Zero, which both have been patched in VeraCrypt.

Not to mention VeraCrypts own audit that uncovered several vulnerabilities that has now been patched

>>60792432
>using dead software

You're still on Windows XP for sure.

>>60792778
Hold enter for full access.
CVE-2016-4484 is the most blatant proof Linus is a botnet for TLAs.

>>60794157
Just say nudes you acoustic baguette.

>>60793415
wannacry

>>60793438
No but the sony police might.

>>60796329
ok thanks

>>60792432
>proven to have no vulnerabilies
is it even possible?