>firefox
>standards-conforming browser
I'm sure they'll catch up eventually!
You'll have to provide more technical details than that, dummy. That score tells us nothing. What does Chrome have or do correctly that Firefox lacks or does incorrectly? For all we know, they didn't toggle some Firefox prefs, or perhaps Firefox developers decided against something for security/privacy reasons (though admittedly that's a rarity).
>>60755321
>Use arbitrary numbering system to evaluate something without providing technical background on the subject matter.
Into the trash it goes.
>still using sjwfox
>>60755321
I have no idea what is this, but at least they place Safari right.
>>60756315
looks like html5test.com
epic troll thread you brain dead retard
Does Firefox include pale moon?
>>60757336
pale meme*
>>60755321
Blink (a.k.a. IE6 2.0) web standards
>>60755391
WHAT DO THE NUMBERS MEAN, MASON?