>barely faster than a 6950X >a $1500 processor that has

>>60754966
Geekbench3 is cache bound garbage and that's the reason Apple uses it all the time.
It's inflating scores like old CPU-z did.

DESI/g/nated

File: 1491958654249.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>60754966
Wait for Cannonlake

>>60755397
>slower than 14nm

>>60755397
Mobile only.
You got another skylake refresh before Icelake hits in late 2019

File: Mysterious Merchant.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

DELET THIS.

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-05 at 13.41.33-fullpage.png (2MB, 1302x1942px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1302x1942px

>>60754966
You weren't fucking joking, lol

File: delid_this_logo.png (334KB, 679x702px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 679x702px

>>60755452

>>60755455
>308W
Sides status: currently in orbit
House status: currently burnt down to ashes

File: 1496427478955.jpg (87KB, 500x872px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 500x872px

>>60755455
>308w

>>60755455
delid

>>60754966
>$500 Ryzen 1800X
You mean $450

File: 7c6.png (11KB, 211x246px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 211x246px

>>60755455
>three hundred and eight watts

>>60756343
outside US it's still 500$ or barely above

>>60755455
>>60756494
>308W
what le fug

File: 1496102500371.jpg (59KB, 493x493px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 493x493px

>Skylake-X
>Coffeelake
>Cannonlake
>Icelake
>Geminilake
i honestly lost the track of what's what

>>60754966
>Applebench

>>60755455
haha... surely that simply has to be something like Nvidia's power limit setting, right? That's more power for the CPU than most PCs draw in total.

>>60756822

they like lakes apparently

yellowlake when?

File: another lake cpu.jpg (51KB, 439x306px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 439x306px

>>60756822
>>60756844
>>60756942

>>60755455
THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHT WATTS

NOT EVEN THE 5GHZ FX SERIES WAS THIS RETARDED

>>60756844
>>60756942
>>60757288

Performance-lack
Efficiency-lack
Competitiveness-lack
Integrity-lack
Honesty-lack
Freedom-lack
Goy-lack

>>60757331
I'm pretty sure that's not correct, but the performance being so medicore is pretty much expected. All they did was drop the price from $1700 to $1000, really.

File: 1473014228852.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>60754966
the funny thing is that most of amd products carry so many driver and overheating problems that people (including me) are willing to overpay just to get intel/nvidia.
>t. my first amd gpu

>>60757386
AMD's GPUs and drivers aren't doing that badly lately. They just have nothing to compete with in the high end until Vega.

You will NEVER convince me to EVER go back to amd I will just wait till the gen following this to upgrade my 6700k

>>60757386
A sheckel for the good goy.

>>60757432
>I will just wait till the gen following this to upgrade my 6700k
Coffee Lake S just got delayed to Feb 2018. And it's only going to be 14nm+ to 14nm++. So basically, it's fucking nothing. 3-5% perf. increase if you're lucky. 10nm on desktops is still MIA.

You're going to be waiting until 2010 or 2011 to see anything interesting out of Intel again. When their new architecture comes out.

>>60757481
Oh ok I will just hop into my tardis and go back in time to pick up those upgrades then

>>60757513
Oh fuck, I derped. 2020/2021. http://wccftech.com/intel-developing-new-x86-uarch-succeed-core-generation/

This is what I get for shitposting before my morning coffee.

>>60757386
AMD drivers actually have lower overhead because they implement a lot of things in hardware instead in drivers like nVidia, which really shows with new efficient low-level APIs like Vulkan and D3D12.

>>60757549
>just wait 4 years goyim
Now gonna work schlomo.

>>60757386
So you prefer buying from a company that gimps their GPUs once their new line releases
>t.970 owner

>>60757596
I have a 1070 and I have not noticed any gimping as you claim

>>60757620
Because 1070 is still current gen?

>>60757620
Did the 1170 get released?

>>60757620
That is the newest GPU from them you butt. I'm still on Kepler, this thing is practically worthless even though theoretically it's still not that bad of a GPU.

>>60757640
No titan so is current gen just the forerunner

>>60757649
Titan is the flagship, retard, not the entirety of the current gen.

Volta GPUs when

>>60757646
Strange my 780 lasted around 4 years before I moved to the 1070 when it finally started to show it's age

>>60757689
It was outperformed by the fucking 7970 in most new games for at least two of those years.

>>60757709
Ya sure pal I had no issues with it the one amd card I owned was slow shitty and ultimately died on me I have never had an nvidia die on me plus amd has no cards in the high-end

File: I+can+just+imagine+you+sitting+in+the+corner+of+_d720d4a7e08a111119ea05407a961b15.jpg (9KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 200x200px

You guys know whats the funniest part.

AMD basically 2 R7 CPU's together right? Nothing wrong with that, Intel did the same a couple years ago

The reason Intel couldn't do this anymore because its TDP would be around 360-400W

>>60757681
Just Wait goy, you're a good goy right?

>>60757745
>I got one bad GPU therefore the entire company and every product they make is shit for all eternity
Are you like, 12? By any chance? What partner brand was it anyway?
>>60757681
Q2 2018.

>>60757681
You need to wait, gweilo.

>>60755455
>308 watts
It would more efficient to run my small air conditioner at 69 F during the winter than this heate- CPU...

File: IMG_1088.png (123KB, 240x286px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 240x286px

>>60755455
T H R E E H U N D R E D E I G H T W A T T S

>>60757768
>The reason Intel couldn't do this anymore because its TDP would be around 360-400W
I thought it's because their arch literally can't support it.

>>60757794
It was an Asus and every Asus nvidia I have owned has been stellar I am 30 actually and like I said amd has no high end they have things that barely compete with the 1070

>>60757331
>mfw could ask someone what has a lower wattage, a 9570 or an intel chip
>it's actually the 9570

>>60757828
You know ASUS isn't saving up better components for their NVidia cards. You just got unlucky.

>>60757331
>>60756796
>>60756494
>>60755773
>>60755729
>>60755700
>>60755461
Something seems really off in (>>60755455), do processors normally use such high amperage?

Below the "308W", there is "Max Current = 1023.875 Amps".. Welders don't even go that high.

>>60757904
Yeah that is definitely a bug.

>>60757895
You still have not addressed the no high end argument

>>60757913
It sucks, but AMD is a smaller company, and they're split between CPUs and GPUs. They can't push products out as fast as NVidia. Vega should be out 2 months ago. Shit happens.

File: abstract.png (1KB, 501x585px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 501x585px

>>60757745
Thanks for the advice. I will never buy slow, shitty cards that die on me. Fuck AMD!!

>>60757912
So if their test software is buggered, can we even trust the performance score it shits out?

(the proper answer is: "No, no we can't")

>>60757904
The 308W seems accurate, since the officialy declared TDP of 140W is measured with basic frequency only. Once it starts turbo boosting the TDP and power go through the roof.

>>60757966
The end result cinebench score is different than a misread voltage level.

>>60757821
Nothing stops them making mcms of lcc dies and link them with qpi.

>>60757985
So why does wattage shoot into the stratosphere when they try and do this?

>>60757985
Except maybe the dies melting through the board unless they target 2 GHz clocks.

>>60757904
It's a reporting error. But you can expect like 250-300A. It's 300W at 1-1.2V

>>60757966
Yes we can. Sensor data being misreported or misunderstood by software has 0 impact on the performance. Sensor reading is an isolated activity so to speak, in that it has no impact on the rest of the function of the CPU and in many cases even older CPU/chipsets still have reporting errors.

It's believed one of the sensors that AMD uses still misreports even though it's been like 5 years. We can still trust performance scores.

File: image.jpg (252KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 653x726px

>>60757432
>JUST WAIT(tm)

>>60757596
Haven't noticed any significant performance loss on my 980.
Will be upgrading to Vega for 4K/VR and freesync soon if it performs well for the price. Tempted to just get a 1080Ti and call it a day though, the wait is killing me.

>>60756844
they should bring the bridges back, at least they where good

>>60757828
ASUS's AMD cards pre-Polaris had literally no effort whatsoever put into them.

The Hawaii cards specifically had the same heatpipe layout as Nvidia cards, so it completely missed the VRM.

My last AMD card was a Sapphire HD6870 and it was pretty dope.

So how long until Intel officially recommends that these only be used in an air conditioned server room with a fire surpression system?

File: watercooled i9-7980XE.jpg (104KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1280x720px

>>60758139
Too late ..

>>60757904
1023 A / 308 W = 3.2 V

3.2 Volts is normal for a CPU. Not a problem.

>>60755455
>308 Watts
I think that even a OC dual Nehalem rig can't reach that comsuption CPU alone...

>>60757386
FUD
U U
DUF

>>60758103
personaly i like msi amd cards, but sapphire is fine

>>60758288
P=UI

It's not 1023A/308W but 308W/1023A = 300mV or so.

>>60758288
But U=P/I, it should be 0.3 V.

>>60758360
>>60758354
I just followed a guide online and failed :(
Okay, so, how many volts are flowing through?

>>60758407
Are you retarded? Both of the people you quoted told you the exact voltage.

>>60758430
I mean, what is the correct voltage that the CPU is using because my equation is wrong. So, whats the correct equation to find the correct amps and volts the CPU is using?

>>60758448
The one we used. That is, if we had correct data which we don't.

>>60755397
>just wait

Wasn't that supposed to be the AMD fanboy line?

>>60758500
Yes. The irony is quite delicious.

File: 1448633766883.jpg (312KB, 1896x1864px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1896x1864px

>>60755397
>wait
so Intel is now Just Wait ? Slurppppppsss

File: 1476673413706.jpg (13KB, 330x328px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 330x328px

>>60755455
>300watts
WHAT THE FUCK ?

>>60757386
|
|>
|
|3
|
|

>>60755455
3 0 8 W A T T S
0 8 T
8 T
W A T T S
A
T
T
S

File: 1024px-Bundesstraße_308_number.svg.png (37KB, 1024x614px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1024x614px

>>60755455
Lmao do I even need to run the heat during the winter with this?

File: 1493932977399.png (234KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 800x612px

>>60757386
INTEL IS GETTING BTFO QUICK SWITCH THE TOPIC TO AMD GPUS

File: Holy+i+didn+t+have+that+one+_27f4ea5616d2dbe9b98e1e04f0cfb675.png (26KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 200x200px

>>60758864
>>60758786
>>60758601
HAVE YOU EVER ASKED YOURSELF, WHAT IF MY CPU CONSUMED MORE POWER THAN A 290X OR A GTX 480 WELL INTEL HAS THE ANSWER FOR YOU

INTRODUCING THE NEW SKYLAKE-X CPU NOW WITH MOAR CORES THAN AMD AND MORE POWER CONSUMPTION THAN ANY CPU OR GPU ON THE MARKET

>>60757386
380x works on my machine

>>60758983
Sometimes I can't imagine how you can go beyond 200 watts in a CPU but then I remember the 295x2 exists and shudder a little.

File: 1496424178719.jpg (84KB, 640x429px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 640x429px

>>60755455

>>60761012
Nice update on that old maymay.

OY VEY
SHUT THIS THREAD DOWN NOW

File: comic.jpg (120KB, 480x853px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 480x853px

>>60757432
I mostly post this to remember that it is seven years old now.

>>60754966
having a million fucking cores what do you expect. Why did they sell this to consumers

>>60755455
sauce?

>>60762609
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/tech_preview_intel_core_i9_skylake_x_processors,3.html

File: delid.png (109KB, 2250x2324px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 2250x2324px

>Fermilake-E

>>60762661
unfortunally no temps show.
Its interesting to see the chips going around 4.3 on less than 1.3V, however, they never show temps, which probably means temps are reaching near throttling level.
Also consider that Intel utility torture test runs usually much cooler than other like even cinebench.

Intel made a somewhat good processor, with probably good oc potential, limited by shoddy tim.

>>60756942
pisslake

INTEL IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT INTEL SHILLS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH.

File: 1491857091167.png (316KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 882x758px

>>60755455
NOOOOOOOO AMD WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE KING OF HIGH TEMPS