Is there software which can automatically produce seamless stitches

File: 1494419412769.jpg (776KB, 1920x3060px) Image search: [Google]

776KB, 1920x3060px

>>60733485
No, but you can adjust the shots manually to get them pretty close, and you can heal the edges so they're not so obvious. Clouds can just be cloned/healed. A little cut and paste will take care of the ocean.

>>60733485
Photoshop photomerge.

File: stitch.jpg (1MB, 1552x2512px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1552x2512px

>>60733622
I figured out how to do it manually with basically lots of layers, a big, soft eraser and some touchups with some soft brushes.
>>60733676
Will look into, thanks.

File: stitch.png (4MB, 1552x2512px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1552x2512px

>>60733825
I fixed a cloud on the right. Also, .png now.

File: lol.jpg (886KB, 1937x3796px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 1937x3796px

>>60733676
Yeah, this didn't work very well. I'll try it some time on a panning shot where the foreground and background move at the same pace.

File: 1447119003462.jpg (23KB, 190x179px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 190x179px

>>60733849
>Also, .png now.

File: stitch.jpg (1MB, 1552x2512px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1552x2512px

>>60733986
>post .jpg
>/a/ complains
>post .png
>/g/ complains

>>60734007
There is no point in png when your source is jpeg, you're bloating the filesize for no reason.

>>60734029
Source was .png screenshots taken with MPC-HC. I know better than to set MPC-HC to save screenshots with its shitty fucking .jpg algorithm.

>>60733622
How old is that girl?

There is a free program called autostitch which does the same thing that Photoshop photomerge does, but for free. Neither is very good because they tend to fuck up the proportions, and when you're trying to merge a purely vertical pan, both will give you a rounded or stretched final image that requires cropping and God knows how the actual image now deviates from a purely linear crop - if either were capable of doing it.

File: Microsoft-Image-Composite-Editor[1].jpg (365KB, 2401x1538px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 2401x1538px

>>60733485
Microsoft ICE.

If you take more screenshots it also compensates for camera angle changes, but if there's a lot of change in perspective it's going to be a mess. Also works for non-planar movement, it's pretty neat.

>>60734065
She's twelve. Based Japan.

File: [HorribleSubs] Eromanga-sensei - 09 [720p].mkv_snapshot_00.08_[2017.06.04_04.59.42]_stitch.jpg (157KB, 1280x1158px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1280x1158px

>>60734085
Example for basic planar auto-stitch.

>>60734065
enough for the cock

>>60734175
sure.

File: 01_stitch.jpg (744KB, 1852x3012px) Image search: [Google]

744KB, 1852x3012px

>>60734085
This comes close but not quite. This is as close as I could get it by messing with the vertical and search radius bars under overlap. It's completely incapable of getting both her left leg and the ocean's alignment right. It either gets her leg right and aligns the ocean wrong like this, or it aligns the ocean properly and squishes her leg vertically. Interesting software, though.

>>60734391
Now that I look at it more it also fucked up her left elbow and her heel.

>>60733485
>tfw youll never have a girl try so hard to make you fall for her or vice versa

just kill me now.

>>60734421
>and then reject her for your lazy, disgusting stepsister

>>60734391
Now that I think about it, I bet it could probably do it right if I could export every frame from the entire sequence with VirtualDub, but that wasn't an option for this pan since I was limited to frames without credits.

>>60734507
You can include credits as if they're in the minority of screenshots it'll ignore them, but otherwise yields funny results.

Usually if there's too much of a change you can't get perfect results with it, but for simple planar movement it works great.