>install many popular distros >have SSD, 4core AMD, 8GB

>60729211
>uses AMD
>not memorising the entire system always wich makes it super ram *light*
> calls it graphical UI insted of graphical userinterface/GUI
> (did you partition everything well? think swapp partition etc)
> how is your disk health?

>>60729211
>firefox
>running linux from a liveUSB/VM/Using a heavy DE
>implying font rendering on windows is good
>his DE doesn't have decent font rendering
>implying explorer doesn't take time to completely load huge folders
Just use PCmanFM or ranger if you're extra autistic.

>>60729211
>on win it takes 1sec
takes seconds on my windows machine

>>60729211
I was screencasting 60FPS nd opening firefox with tons of addons and yet it takes barely 4 seconds.
http://webm.land/media/tmp/2456ef42-d525-401a-9b82-94684442fbb9.webm

Windows is the same. It's not your OS, firefox takes time to check addon compatibility and see if the addon config files are intact or not.

Too bad you are just another unpaid micros**t shill that's pretending windows takes 1 second to load firefox.

Let's see you screencast and load firefox with 7+ addons in 1 second in your shilling OS faggot I dare you

>>60732436
minutes*

>>60729211
>doesnt know what infinality patch is

>>60732552
And this is your browser without tons of addons.

OP is a computer illiterate faggot that should stick to windows. Also keep in mind that these videos well exceed the size limitations because they are recorded in 1080@60 FPS

OP eternally BTFO
http://webm.land/media/tmp/bf9cc63f-74f9-4e90-bc0e-2a6a1d46ea64.webm

>>60732577
>suggesting the use of a deprecated patchset

>>60732107
>implying ranger isn't the best file manager