What's the best looking 24" monitor I can get for around

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236305

It's an inch shorter, but that's not always bad.

IPS

https://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-U2414H-Screen-Monitor/dp/B00GTV05XG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1496505396&sr=8-2&keywords=dell+u2415

Worth the extra $25

>>60726223
It's either $100 for 1080p 60hz IPS displays with VESA from AOC

or $200 for 1080p 144hz TN displays

size doesn't matter

File: 1312236771110.jpg (18KB, 346x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 346x300px

>>60726223
Like, the thigns on the screen? Or the actual physical screen itself?

>>60726256
Thats what he said.

>>60726653
The display

Gotta be 1080p though

>>60726475
Basically this. For $200 you'll either get a good looking ips with low refresh, or a high refresh rate with less image quality

>>60726307
This. Went for this over a 27" for a similar cost. 24" is much more comfy as a primary monitor anyway.

File: Screenshot_2017-05-29-21-38-37.png (265KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 960x540px

Best 24" gaming monitor for under 300???

>>60726666
Ayyyyyy

>>60726307

This, rocking 2 x U2417H (same monitor but a Samsung panel instead of LG) and couldn't be happier.
Even my cousin that had a 1ms gayman TN monitor got a U2414H after testing one of mine side by side with his and seeing that the difference in practice was none.

>>60726475
>>60726256
do not listen to these people with little dicks.

go for lg 29 incher
it is 170$ has almost 100% color accuracy .

Anyone know what the cheapest 144hz monitor is?

>>60730682
why 144? You can buy 10$ 23 inch 122hz crt from your grandpa.
It will have also superior color accuracy,deep black etc...

Crt>plazma>ips

>>60730702
Because the resolution is trash

>>60730729
>RETARD
This made me angry,CRT has better resolution than anything you can buy under 400$

>>60730758
Any crt under 400 dollars is only 1080p 60hz

Any trash 1080p LCD/led can easily do 75-100hz

Not to mention they aren't fucking VGA

>>60730960
>>60730682

>>60730944
1. Crt resolution scaling is far superior
2. You can set crt to display 500000x500000
3. We are not talking about new crt but used that is far from 400$
4.Op asked about monitor under 200$ you are not gonna find 4k monitor with 144hz under 200$ and crt still has superior color than TN
5.You are gay and I do not like you :^(

>>60731096
>used CRT
enjoy your washed out colors
[spoiler]CRT was too good for this world[/spoiler]

>>60730944
>hating on VGA
cuck

>>60731096
I'm not sure if you're just underage or retarded

>>60730660
Link me up senpai

@OP craigslist a $40 1080p monitor

>>60726223
Qnix QX2710 (non HDMI version, ie the DVI only version)
>2560x1440
>PLS (similar to IPS)
>Can run between 96Hz to 120Hz
>Easy to find for under $200
>practically no input lag
>no scaler so no compatibility issues
>everything runs perfectly with Linux

>>60726653
Yes

>>60728152
Wrong. Qnix 2710 is high refresh, IPS quality, high resolution, and low input lag

>>60726885
1080p is garbage; get 1440p

>>60730227
Qnix QX2710

>>60730944
>1080p CRT
you are not smart anon

Pure looks? Probably the Samsung Quantum Dot. Better colors than IPS, waaaaay better contrast.

>>60731540
Missed the $200 part. The quantum dot VA panels really are the current king of image quality right now and not enough people consider them for whatever reason, but it's more expensive than $200.

For that price, QNIX is good if you can go up to 27'' and run 1440p. I think Crossover had a better model at one point that might be that cheap these days, but I haven't kept up with Korean stuff.

>>60731504
>1080p is garbage; get 1440p
Kys

>>60731654
He's right though. If you can afford a 1440p monitor, it's a huge upgrade.

1080p is (mostly) a poorfag only thing at this point.

>>60731674
Only retard would buy something between 4k and 1k

1.5k is just overpriced meme.

>>60731757
It's really not. Image quality is way better on 1440p panels next to 1080p panels. Literally looking at two of them right now. The only real downside is that the scaling for 1080p content isn't the best, but it's not even that bad.

Not really all that expensive anymore either.

>>60731757
>>60731654
CRTs from the mid nineties had more vertical pixels than 1080. I had fucking 1600x1200 when I was like 15 years old on a fucking free monitor. 1080 is such garbage its not even funny. 1080 was garbage when it was first released, and it is beyond garbage now after like 15+ years of being used on computer monitors. How does it feel knowing that you have less vertical pixels than a monitor that was practically worthless even in 1995?

>>60731757
>1.5k is just overpriced meme.
Several years ago I got my Qnix QX2710 for like $300. It is 2560x1440, I run it at 96Hz though it can probably run at 120Hz, and it is basically an IPS panel. Also, it has extremely low input lag. You can find these for under $200 now. I do not see how that is overpriced

newfag here, i got a new monitor and its my first time ever using 2 flat screens, both are acer h236hl, the original one worked with hdmi fine but after trying to connect a hdmi splitter even the old monitor wont work with a hdmi cord. ive tried different cables too. wat do?

>>60731757
>1.5k
Its 2.5k you stupid bitch

>>60731920
Dont use HDMI, it is a botnet. Use DVI or DisplayPort.

>>60730660
A 29" 1080p monitor is just damned stupid

Also there are 21:9 1080p IPS displays for under $200

If 1440p Korean monitors still exist for $200 then maybe roll the dice on one

>>60731946
my main monitor (new one) is using dvi atm and the older 2nd one is using vga lol, xd botnet hurdur

>>60731811
A 27" 1440p display, and 22" 1080p display will look the same, they have pretty similar ppi

>>60731988
Yea but the 1080 will have a practically unusable amount of vertical pixels. 1080 gives you barely any working area

>>60731988
...yeah?

So 1440p allows you to use bigger monitors and gives you more workable space. I don't see how this isn't a good thing.

>>60732095
Anon, we are clearly dealing with complete retards here

>>60731920
im completely clueless

>>60732095
>>60732071
If you're gaming that doesn't matter though, at $200 you'd want the 1080p 144hz TN free-sync display over 1440p 60hz IPS

For $200, you can get a 1440p 120hz IPS. Even without a good warranty, I would take that over a shitty TN any day of the week.

It also depends on what type of games you play. If you're interested in buying a $200 monitor, you probably don't have the GPU horsepower to put out over 60 frames in anything more demanding than CS:Go or the like(...and if you do, save for a decent monitor. Please don't buy a $500 GPU you'll have to replace in three years and plug it into a budget monitor, that's retarded). If you don't play those types of games, I would take the better image quality every time.

>>60731920
bumppp

>>60731504
Let me reiterate that for your fragile little mind

1920x1080

>>60733125
Where?

>>60733125
Link bro

>the poorfag buying the shitty 1080p monitor says someone else has a fragile little mind

Go get help somewhere else then faggot. Literally nobody pays attention to 1080p monitors these days, let alone budget models.

>>60733267
>>60733283
http://www.ebay.com/itm/QNIX-QX2710-LED-Evolution-ll-Matte-27-2560x1440-SAMSUNG-PLS-QHD-PC-Monitor-/262004485596?hash=item3d00af2ddc:g:HqEAAOSwjVVVzVNK

Might be able to get the multi-input version now too, but I would research it. The scalers they used on the old Korean monitors had some input lag issues.

>>60733293
t. Retard

>>60731959
29" @ 1080 is disgustingly pixelated.

>>60730960
I have three of these. I just bought the third monitor recently from Best Buy. The other two monitors and a triple monitor vesa stand were bought off of Letgo for $45 (!).

>>60733247
>1920x1080 CRT
you are now a confirmed retard. congratulations!

>>60732708
>If you're gaming that doesn't matter though, at $200 you'd want the 1080p 144hz TN free-sync display over 1440p 60hz IPS

No, for gaming I would rather have a 1440p 96Hz IPS

>>60733481
fuckin solid. i got mine for $170 i think. perfect for my 770

>>60733308
You really do *not* want the multi-input version. That is the one that has input lag. The DVI only version has no scaler and very little input lag because of this. In fact, it is among the lowest input lag of LCD monitors

>>60731441
Is there a version with hdmi and display port?

>>60733791
>Is there a version with hdmi
Yes but it can not be overclocked to 96Hz and has more input lag

>display port
Im not really sure

>>60726223
I found a SHARP lc-43n6100u Aquos 43" 4K smart LED TV for $250 at walmart a few weeks ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3PBqwvqURU

bought an HDMI 2.0 cable and use it as a monitor.


pretty neat

>>60733740
Yeah, thought they may have changed the scaler or something along the way because it's been a bit.

The bypass boards are fucking GOAT tier if you're just using it for PC gaming though. I had a Catleap back in the day with one and it started my journey to being autistically interested in input lag figures. Actually appreciably made me better at video games, just like the "1MS" meme monitors claimed but actually real.

>>60734081
Just convert the HDMI to DVI. If you need multiple inputs, you're apparently going to have to spend more money on another monitor though.

>>60734455
amazing

>>60734455
Can someone remind me why we do not do this?
The ppi is good enought and price is cheap.

>>60734573
most TVs have horrendous input lag. I mean it doesnt just make gaming bad; it makes everything bad. moving the mouse around, typing, everything

>>60734573
Input lag, lack of proper Chroma 4:4:4 subsampling on a lot of them, cheap TVs like that usually use pretty shitty panels, whole lot of reasons.

You can actually use a nice TV as a computer monitor if you don't play video games, but there's usually some level of bullshit along the way.

File: IMG_1671.jpg (1016KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1016KB, 3264x2448px

>>60734535
there were some earlier reviews which complained about the UHD 4k not working but there was a Firmware update from SHARP and you need to use an HDMI 2.0 cable on one of the two HDMI ports on the rear of the TV not the side.. its bitchin'

it was a floor model demo thus the cheap price , 90 return but its a keeper..

with the right computer hardware and fat internet pipe its as good as I could hope for without going into thousands of Yen


watching Twin Peaks and that was actually the reason I bought it