If you have a strong opinion on free software and you're on the spectrum, you're being irresponsible.
If you're retarded, any opinion you have is more likely to be ill-informed than that of someone with no mental issues. If you have some form of autism, or you want to be a girl, you are retarded. Any advocacy you do based on your opinions is therefor based on something likely to be wrong.
If you read this and continue to denounce the "evils" of proprietary software, you're knowingly doing something harmful.
Sorry, but that's how it is.
>>60726171
>If you have a strong opinion on free software
Check
>on the spectrum
>have some form of autism
Dunno but maybe
>you want to be a girl
Check
>you are retarded
:^(
>If you read this and continue to denounce the "evils" of proprietary software, you're knowingly doing something harmful.
I will continue to anyway, fuck you.
>Sorry, but that's how it is.
You're not sorry reee.
>>60726863
>You're not sorry
I've wanted to be an outspoken free software advocate myself, but I recently came to the realization in the OP and now I'm not so sure.
>>60727013
>Replies:2
>Posters: 2
Samefag please go
>>60727197
Gee, almost as though I'm the OP or something.
>>60726171
I don't get your point, other than in a very loose, general way as "what neurotypicals would find agreeable is not the same as what I would find agreeable". You're wrong about the function of advocacy anyway; it's not about 'convincing' people (which is largely a fiction), it's about triggering flags in the brains of those who are wired so as to accept such a stance. A 'self-sort according to the signal' process. This is a good thing to keep in mind for other situations as well.
Agency is not evenly distributed within a population.