No stupid questions thread in sight. I'll start one.
Looking for a lightweight browser that isn't K-meleon or Qupzilla.
>>60716263
Opera 12
I'm using a WAN extender, and it shows that the extender/repeater is getting 66% from the main router but it is giving 90-100% to relevant devices. Will this affect performance or nah? No I can't move the repeater elsewhere.
I flashed my Moto X back to Android 6.0, but it can't connect to wifi. I can't even turn on wifi mode. I tried flashing to 5.1 and it's doing the same thing.
>>60716263
pale moon
I want to know if the technology behind HDMI 2.1 means we will have to buy new monitors or will we be able to buy stuff like adapters to take advantage of the new features (mostly the variable refresh rate)?
Dillo? https://www.dillo.org/
What are you looking for exactly? What is wrong with K-Meleon?
>>60719714
>palemoon
>lightweight
It is what I use, but it seems to run marginally better on my shit box compared to Firefox.
>>60716263
Is Solus/Budgie any good? How does /g/ rate its odds of long-term survivability? I've been bitten by too many distros that end up getting abandoned that I've stuck with Fedora for years.
>>60719661
You might need to flash a stock modem. Try searching in XDA. Does you Bluetooth or Mobile Data work?
>>60720996
I fear that by going solo and not basing off a bigger distro they doomed themselves from the start. No one is going to support a niche distro like Solus with official packages, and the dev team behind it will eventually lose interest once they see they are too small to handle the task of building and testing a whole OS (as opossed to just the stuff they add on top like Lite, Peppermint, Mint, Manjaro,etc do).
As for budgie, I think it will be the only thing left off Solus once it goes under. Will port their DE to other distros.
Midori, Pale moon or seamonkey?
>>60721115
Pretty sure I downloaded a stock rom from XDA for both 5.1 and 6.0
>>60716263
There is only one answer.