Why doesn't Intel just make the die bigger and stronger

>>60715171
Yeah, sure 32nm tech is dirt cheap to make now.

File: 18033030_1421380821270036_58254950846112466_n.png (548KB, 850x637px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 850x637px

>>60715171
Can Jews just stop being Jews? --op

File: 225px-KL_AMD_Athlon_XP_Barton.jpg (10KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 225x225px

Surely a few felt feet is cheaper than an IHS. And they can make more money from retards cracking their dies.

If you make the die bigger there won't be space for the nfc chip: botnet form the hardware

>>60715171
>>>/v/

Physics and shit

>>60715171
because you'll have a hard time delidding it if the die is any bigger.

>>60715171
At the immensely small scales they deal with, you're going to introduce latency by making the die bigger.

>>60715257
>CPUs are video games

File: 16427388_781062542052304_3613107353629147194_n.jpg (30KB, 479x720px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 479x720px

>>60715171
>make the die bigger
You're in the wrong place friend

>>60715171
They'd have to measure yield in wafers/chip and not the other way around.