why aren't 4:3 resolution monitors industry leading if the

>>60709149
This is obvious bait. However, just in case I'm wrong - it's because you have 2 eyes and a wide fov

File: 1491580457548.gif (2MB, 540x303px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x303px

>>60709149
...that's a dude, isnt it?

>>60709584
Ofcourse and not even cute one.
I demand cute trap!

>>60709184
16:9 is shit and is only pushed because it's cheaper to produce from factories that also make 16:9 TVs

YOU FUCKING CROSS BOARDING SHILL FUCK

>>60709641
Fuck you, I would fuck his cute mouth

>>60709885
Because you are dirty homosexual degenerate,I as heterosexul demand him to look like cute girl.

>>60709184
You're an idiot. The field of vision for humans is better approximated by 4:3 monitors. Wide aspect ratio adoption has nothing to do with human vision and everything to do with filmmaker's love of panoramic shots.

>>60709930
24 inch widescreen is best for field of vision because you do not have to move head or eyes from middle.
On ultrawide you have to move to sides
and on not wide enought you gotta move to top or bottom or you miss a lot from fov

>>60709184
>it's because you have 2 eyes and a wide fov
http://www.swift.ac.uk/about/files/vision.pdf

>>60709149
That's a cute boy.

>>60709584
>>60709641
>>60709998
soe is a girl (｡>﹏<｡)

>>60710529
but where do i find them?

>>60710562
soembie

>>60709930

>The field of vision for humans is better approximated by 4:3 monitors.

That is only relevant if you cover most of you field of view with a screen. Like in a cinema. For computers, aspect ratio is better as either very wide or very tall.

Very rarely is square preferable.

>>60710587
my penis thanks you

>>60710613
dont sexualize her

>>60709149
i love my gf soe!

>>60709149
Because movies are widescreen. At least we're getting away from this 16:9 bullshit now that 21:9's becoming a thing.

>>60710587
Oh I know her (him)