Its 2017 and Google still doesn't use a vectorized logo.

File: 871.png (153KB, 500x254px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 500x254px

tfw nobody cares

>b-but i care!

nobody

>>60659543
It's 2017 and nobody uses webp format its sad

>>60659639
Google does.

>>60659543
>>60659664
>Google
who?

>>60659560

OP and me care. Kys scott, you got fucking rekt just now. By me.

File: googlelogo_color_272x92dp.png (6KB, 272x92px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 272x92px

>>60659543
>It would be less than a few kb
but it already is...

>>60659639
The other day I downloaded a phone wallpaper of that format and I was suprised that Android supported it.

>>60660004
Well of course, it's made by Google.

>>60659771
Google claims to have an SVG version of the logo that is around 300 bytes in size.

File: BBB_pepe_hat.png (139KB, 400x504px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 400x504px

>>60659560
I also care.

That's THREE people now. You're a stinkin' loser and getting told off by multiple people. Embarrassing. You really should delete your trip before this gets any worse pal. You're just a fat freakin geek, go dunk your head in a bowl of SOUR buttermilk..

File: 1445448651968.png (461KB, 7477x8192px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 7477x8192px

>>60660121
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Google_2015_logo.svg

>>60660370
Why aren't they using this? Do they own such a large part of the Internet infrastructure that they no longer have to care about optimization to save bandwidth?

>>60660426
SVG is still not supported everywhere (think IE 10 and below), unlike PNG.

>>60660426
phones can't into svg

>>60660370
file size: 2 KB

File: 1495949268084.jpg (37KB, 381x380px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 381x380px

>>60660479
Your turn.

>>60660519
https://www.clicktorelease.com/tmp/google-svg/image.svg

>>60660479
When you idiots are dick measuring 100mb, 300mb, 1gb internet speeds, but argue over a 4kb advantage.

True autismo

File: Screenshot_2017-05-30-12-17-42.png (192KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1440x2560px

>>60660469
Opera can

File: Untitled.jpg (738B, 272x92px) Image search: [Google]

738B, 272x92px

Bish, few kilobytes? All you need is 738 bytes. You can barely see the difference in image quality.

>>60660567
That advantage will be big when the file will be downloaded a bunch of times.
>>60660657
Needs more jpg

>>60660370
https://p.fuwafuwa.moe/zgmpbf.svgz

>All these stupid niggers thinking that google should switch from 6kb image to 300 byte svg
The image is cached on in your browser.
Google hosts way more shit than their shitty web search page.
This optimization would be likely unnoticable by them.

File: a.png (4KB, 683x25px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 683x25px

>>60660657