What would you do /g/ edition 96 cores, 192 threads quad E7

dude you could get so many fpses with that in cs:go...

A bland supermicro chassis?

>>60618336
Do you want a monster or do you want RGBs? I'll take a monster.

>>60618350
I'm not shitting on supermicro, but that's just a pic of a supermicro.
What's inside it? That's the shit that matters.

>>60618336

Not enough LEDs for you, gamerbabby?

PaaS (portage as a service)

Video processing, obviously.

File: Photo on 28-5-17 at 12.26 pm.jpg (174KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1080x720px

>>60618383
Nigga

File: smiley-small.jpg (18KB, 440x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 440x300px

Compile, render videos, and multi-task like I always do I guess.

Probably don't need so much horsepower. I don't do very much linear (or non-linear) math and I don't visualize that many systems.


I'd probably just brag on speccy threads like a retard.

>>60618285

>"Sinebench"

>>60618285

convert my multi-terrabyte 24/192 PCM vinyl library to DSD for shits and giggles....

>>60618412
Is that a rack server? Do you ever use it as a desktop? Or do you have an actual use for it?

>>60618285
install gentoo

>>60618285
C&C for a mega botnet

>>60618465
Just got it this week, setting it up now.
Wanted a storage shelf that I could fill with 3.5's, this is only 2.5 but it's a fantastic server, so I'll just attach it to a disk array with iSCSI or some external sas or whatever, as soon as I can get my hands on something decent.

>>60618285
Only 8000cb? when a single 16c/32t amd processor can get 3000?
bingbus really scales like trash

>>60618576
What's it got inside?

Want a storage shelf too but waaay to expensive for me. Prob just get a T7500 and throw 6 HDDs in it.

>>60618392
That would be Platform as a service, right?

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-28 at 12.45.59 pm.png (38KB, 444x603px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 444x603px

>>60618461
>DSD
What is this voodoo?

>>60618633
If I had to guess, it's a bus limitation, but I'm not a computer engineer.

Gaymes

Get 30 FPS at The Crown in Planetside 2.

>>60618640
Sampling rate of 2.8224MHz @1-bit vs 44.1kHz @ 16-bit

>>60618634
An intel S5520ur, 2X ~2009 quad core xeons, 18GB ram, and 8x 2.5" slots that I'm filling with 500GB disks from old laptops.
Looking at a 12 bay SAS rack right now, would rather 24 but oh well.
I've got a good 30 or so 2TB+ drives just sitting in boxes that I wanna get live.

>>60618461
How the fuck do you play a DSD file? I just downloaded a demo and 2 different players and they're saying no device detected.

>>60618285
4P naples is going to trash this thing and use less power.
AMD might start charging premiums now that Intel can't compete.

File: .jpg (103KB, 645x316px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 645x316px

>>60618640
Also that DSD graph does a terrible job at showing pulse-density modulation as well as the sampling rate difference. Here's a better way to look at it.

>>60618712
I'm waiting to see how much threadripper will cost.. Since it's not an AM4 socket, I'm _guessing_ you can put them on a dual/quad socket mobo.

>>60618693
Not bad. I want to get a rack server and throw it in my basement, but I'm worried about how loud it will be.

My justification is because I have 1gbit internet. I'd looooove to get pfSense and a NAS running.

>>60618712
there won't be 4P naples, the market share is way too low at ~7%

but the 2P naples will already trash that thing because the scaling is almost perfect

>>60618744
Naples (Epyc) is 1P and 2P
Threadripper is 1P only

>>60618762
>"Ryzen"
>"Threadripper"
>"Epyc"
Someone on AMD's naming team really needs a pink slip handed to him.

>>60618744
>Not bad. I want to get a rack server and throw it in my basement, but I'm worried about how loud it will be.
The answer is loud.
Still, a desktop connected to a disk rack shouldn't be too bad.
>My justification is because I have 1gbit internet. I'd looooove to get pfSense and a NAS running.
I just got 12/1, and am already upgrading to 100/40, the shit you could do with gigabit...

>>60618783
Well, 3 different names for 3 different categories
I don't really mind much those specific names

>>60618762
Ah didn't know.


>>60618712
>>60618762
Worth watching;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtYTPcshyA0

>>60618788
Darn. I'll have to figure something out as far as reducing sound is concerned. Or just get a T7600 or a Z workstation or something and spend a few extra bucks..


I have google fiber. The shitty part is you HAVE to use THEIR router; but ofc you can still use another router, another hop though..

>>60618831
Where I live we get a state provided modem with an ethernet port we have to connect our own router to. It's our own router that actually negotiates with the ISP. With google it's all bundled into one device? You have control over port forwarding?

>>60618285
only really useful for virtualization, calculating pi or generating seti units if that still goes on.

>>60618831
>AMD: 44 core
Did they disable cores or something just to have the same specs?

>>60618912
yes, they used slower memory too
keep watching the video

File: Capture.png (1MB, 741x630px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 741x630px

>>60618412
>on the floor
At least put it on something.

>>60618883
Yes, with google it is all in one box. They actually had to dig up a bunch of shit outside my house to run the wires -- small price to pay (not that I had to pay it.)

Yes, you have control over port forwarding. However, you have to login to your google account... and then finding the actual port forwarding page is a further pain in the ass..

>>60618912
I'm pretty sure they were running 2x22 core CPUs with 88 threads total.

>>60618945
they disabled the cores, there is no 22 core cpu

>>60618933
Indeed. One does wonder why performance didn't scale better when they enabled all cores and upped the memory speed, though.

>>60618936
Once I'm done setting it up I'll throw it in a cabinet.

>>60618979
it was ~25% faster with all the cores, which is far from perfect, but still really good scaling

>>60619060
It ran in 15.783 seconds with all cores enabled, and 17.691 seconds with 44 cores enabled. That's more like 10% faster.

>>60618285
>one E7 8890 V4 = ~2900cb
>four E7 8890 V4 = ~8000cb
holy shit intel that's some shitty scaling there

>>60619176
Intel is just starting to experiment with threads, give them a break. It's not like they're AMD.

File: zAKQLNu.png (10KB, 531x232px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 531x232px

>>60619221
this is even funnier

>>60618285
>sine-bench
I'm going to go to the sine-ma and watch some sine-deralla.

File: photo_2017-05-27_20-39-28.jpg (97KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1280x960px

>>60618412
>>60618693
are you my clone or something? im also using salvaged 500 GB drives.

>>60619221
See >>60619097 doe.

>>60618285
guess I'd run a huge ass database or something
there's really nothing I as a home user could find myself needing that for at this time

>>60618383
he's not wrong though supermicro hardware is boring as fuck and I'd never buy it second hand when there are other options that do the same exact shit at the same exact price point and look way nicer while they do it

>>60620575
Can't lie, you'd still want it if you're not the one paying for it.

>>60618285
Watch anime.