So /g/, do you think $250 for a 4k 28" monitor with a 2ms

>>60591380
For europe standards it's a steal, sonething like this is 400€. I hope you don't mind shitty tn panels though, this thing probably has one.

>>60591380
4K for 28" is useless and retarded.

>>60591517
Correct

>>60591517
Explain?

File: optimal-viewing-distance-television-graph-size.png (49KB, 547x461px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 547x461px

>>60591680
Unless you plan examining monitor with a looking glass, 4K starts making sense around 50", which is TV territory. Speaking of which, this years LG OLED TVs are not bad attached to PC, if you have money to burn, prices aren't nice.

>>60591517
25" 1440p masterrace

>Acer anything
no

>>60591710
>4k at 50"
do you enjoy looking at each individual led while using the computer?
I have a 27" 4k monitor and I still see the pixels
maybe 8k in a few years will help

>>60591710
do you happen to have an image like that but with 1440p included?

>>60591710
Just because some idiot put his opinion in a graph once doesn't make it right. My 24" 1440p looks significantly sharper than my old 1080p one.

File: resolution_chart.jpg (134KB, 860x587px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 860x587px

>>60591858
3 seconds in google

>>60591879
didn't bother me enough

>>60591853
>>60591876
You guys have amazing eye sight then.
Me being a code monkey 8 hours a day and then typically playing games for the rest of it, not so much. For me 55" 4K I didn't see any pixels, YMMV.

File: 81310573.jpg (44KB, 409x393px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 409x393px

>>60591876
>Just because some idiot put his opinion in a graph once doesn't make it right

>>60591939
I have 150% eyesight, I don't know what this is converted into the 20/20 way to express it. Sure, I don't bother when I'm watching a movie without my glasses, but when I'm coding, I like that the text is crisp.

>>60591517
Correct.
>>60591680
asian_guy_holding_his_fingers_together.gif

>>60592064
That's Ken Jeong you uncultured swine.

>>60591710
That's not what the graph says.

I am about 0,5 meter away from my monitor and according to that graph at that distance with a 27 inch monitor UHD is worth it

Learn to read a fucking graph before you post it dumbass

File: F YOU [Trump to Jeb!].webm (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>60592124
american_president_whispering_in_jeb_bushes_ear.webm
I have this one though

>>60592170
what a greaseball

Response times in real world performance doesn't matter. Since most will on average go up to the same amount anyways. Hopefully though your 4k monitor is also IPS otherwise enjoy low viewing angles and skewed colors due to it

>>60591710
your own graph proves you wrong, retard

this is about a computer monitor, not TV

>>60592356
How monitors are different, idiot?

>>60591876
>My 24" 1440p looks significantly sharper than my old 1080p one.
>ppi
>sharpness
Choose 1 retard.

>>60592405
Mainly viewing distance, but also content.

>>60592476
I dont know what you mean but that graph is about resolution and distance at which you cant tell pixels apart.

>>60592539
But you don't need to tell the individual pixels apart if you're watching spongebob.

>>60592539
>I dont know what you mean
Are you mentally challenged somehow?
1. you don't watch monitors from the same distance as TVs and
2. you mostly don't watch the same content either (and most TV content isn't even UHD)

>>60592608
>1. you don't watch monitors from the same distance as TVs and
You fucking retard you see that graph? You see the scales? It has nothing to do with "television" being written on it its about resolution, display size and distance from it.
>2. you mostly don't watch the same content either (and most TV content isn't even UHD)
Its not about content you absolute retard.

>>60592628
Yeah, you really are mentally challenged.
Go re-read the thread and ask a normal IQ person to assist you this time.

>>60592652
You really are retarded and not even pretending.

File: Trolling101.png (22KB, 1000x872px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 1000x872px

>>60592476
>>60592539
>>60592608
>>60592628
>>60592652
>>60592658
Either pic related or you should both kys

>>60591710
What about AA? At smaller screens and 4k does it even make sense to turn on AA on games?

>>60591517
unscaled 28" 4k masterace reporting

Why is a 28 inch screen still so expensive. You can get a 4k tv for cheap now.

Also why the fuck do these brands keep putting freesync in when nobody even uses amd cards

>>60593383
>Also why the fuck do these brands keep putting freesync
Because its literally free compared to Jew-sync.

>>60593395
>added technology
>free

Uh no. There are still costs associated with it

>>60593500
like what?

>>60593500
>>60593510
With G-Sync you need a proprietary hardware module from nvidia, redesign your shit to insert in into the monitor case, also there are some licensing fees. With FreeSync, no such module is required, because it uses the variable refresh rate tech that’s part of the DisplayPort standard (and, more recently, HDMI as well).

>>60593383
I use AMD its perfect for me. more freesync please

>>60591380
I don't get all the hype behind 4k. The human eye can't see beyond 30p anyway, so what's the point?

>>60591380
model? where?
>>60591447
this