Intel Core i9 leak points to Intel's first new processor

>>60419811
Will be priced too high as usual.
I'm not gonna pay $400+ for a 6 core i9.

My 2600k will keep on kicking for the meantime

File: 1483835118251.png (88KB, 279x200px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 279x200px

>i7 quad core

>>60419972
$400 is not too bad for a 6c/12t anon.

4c/8t 6700k and 7700k are about $330.

Also Jewtel needs to stop being fags and allow more than 4 cores on a Z series mobo.

>>60420052
That part confuses me.
Who buys a 4core 4 thread in 2017?

>>60420112
Tom's Hardware

>>60419811
I'm hoping the 7820k is MSRP in the 450 area. As long as it released on launch for under 550 I'll buy it. I believe it'll be cheaper though because of the addition of other models as well as the fact that they basically switched the i7 to encompass 6c. And all HEDT CPUs with more than 6c will have their own price points. The 5820k was roughly in the same price bracket in the Uber expensive launch season then fall to normal price of around 380.

I will be pissed and fucked if the 7820k is above 570$ though.

intel is

FINISHED
INISHED
NISHED
ISHED
SHED
HED
ED
D

>>60420155
Sorry I lied. The first article I read a few days ago had showed the 7800k as an i7 model, which I believed considering the increased popularity over moar cores.

Can someone recommend me a good motherboard for these

>>60420375
It's supposedly a new LGA slot so the mobos aren't out yet.

Why can't Jewtel just keep one fucking LGA standard for all high performance and consumer CPUs?

File: 1492127495787.png (871KB, 801x1500px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 801x1500px

>>60420449

Fee Fie Fo Fum
I smell shit in Intel's pants

>>60420112
Faggots that only game. And don't understand what stutter is.
Dunno how to 'fix' /pcbg/ recommendations without some autist sperging max frames, shitting up the thread for a week straight.

POOTEL DUCKTAPED HOUSEFIRES

>>60419811
>So anyone want to take a stab at prices for the i9 series from Intel?

They're going to lose a lot of customers to Threadripper/Whitehaven regardless, but I would guess $1,000 for the 10-core i9 is the absolute max they can get away with.

Does this mean i5/i7 will be cheaper? Sounds good to me.

>>60420449
A socket change a year keeps the goyim in fear

File: image.jpg (252KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 653x726px

ahh-h-heh just you Wait(tm) AMDrones!

>>60419972
I here ya. My W5580 is still doing what I need it to. And I can always throw in a 6-core from eBay if I wanted.

>>60419811
Hey, Ryzen is pretty gud. What should we do?
Add more cores :DDDD :D
Ebin

File: IMG_19082016_125340.png (167KB, 480x361px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 480x361px

>>60420560
inb4 it's still $1500 and the 12 core is $2000

>>60419972
>>60420080
Hahaha. Their mainstream i7-8700K 6 core is going to be $375-$400. No way they're selling a 6 core for the same as their old 4 core. The "enthusiast" 6 core version is going to be way more expensive.

>>60420686
I mean, it is Intel we're talking about...

>>60420659
AMD is doing a 16c, did you know that? Hypocrite.

>>60419811
Literally a rebranded i7

>>60420560

Sorry anon but >>60420686 is most likely correct.

Intel's current ten-core lineup are two broadwell based xeons.

http://ark.intel.com/compare/93814,93795

If they can get away with charging $7000 for the one with half decent clockspeed then you can sure as hell expect to pay at least $1499.99 for the ten core "prosumer" and closer to $2199.99 for the twelve core "prosumer".

>>60419811
Doesn't matter. Ryzen 9 will provide more cores at similar clock speeds and lower power draw for less money.

>>60420080
>$400 is not too bad for a 6c/12t
>you can literally get that from AMD for half that price
Wow, you guys are cucked beyond belief.

>>60420688
They'll price it on par with the 1800X, and then tom's will review in games using 4 cores max on a 1080ti with turbo3.0 tweaked and say it's AMAZING and has a huge ipc just 6 cores are better than 8.

File: intel.png (179KB, 1002x935px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1002x935px

gotdamn muh dick

>>60420560
>$1,000 for the 10-core
Lol, they're already charging that much for an 8-core i7.

>>60420541
stutter meme is a spook. AMDrones can't come up with conclusive proof

>>60421090
Other than the fact that Intel consistently scores lower minimum frame rates while scoring higher average frame rates?

>>60420794
>http://ark.intel.com/compare/93814,93795
Xeon E7 is for quad socket servers, that's why it's so expensive.
Look at E5 W xeons, those are for single socket workstations.

>>60421112
video proof

File: shut_it_down_jew2.png (171KB, 450x290px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 450x290px

>>60421060
I know, but it has been suggested that with the addition of the 12-core and competition from AMD, everything in the Skylake-X lineup might move down a rung in price. Probably just wishful thinking.

At least there will be a viable alternative.

>>60419811
intel is fucked

they just can't match ryzen prices because it would mean they have been fucking their consumers for years, but if they don't lower their prices, nobody would buy their shit and people would go amd.

sure there will be kids with rich parents that will buy at any price, also the overclock kids that go full autism on benchmarks.

>>60421090
https://youtu.be/fSlQL_iqGFg?t=213

>>60421157
And cut in on their margins? I seriously doubt it. Even if they did manage to keep AMD out of these markets with those kinds of moves they wouldn't be able to keep charging these ridiculous prices. This is a lose-lose for Intel, and this is the result of actual competition.

>>60421184
gta v stutters on everything.

>>60421202
Not the FX chips. Like at all :^)
https://youtu.be/fSlQL_iqGFg?t=185

>>60421232
>3 ryzen boxes on table

im sure these guys are impartial. not

>>60421251
They're the dipshits that got death threats from AMD fans for their Ryzen review...

>>60421273
did they press charges?

>>60421286
AMD are computer enthusiasts. Not slack jaw merchant lackeys. I'm sure if charges were pressed they would lead to dead ends, effectively dropping charges.

File: 1454895603373.jpg (261KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 900x900px

GAYMEN FAGGOTS GET OF MY BOARD

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: 1494832330510.jpg (222KB, 1446x1033px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1446x1033px

>>60419811
OH VEY!

File: sadpepe.jpg (52KB, 600x597px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x597px

>>60421400
pls no bully

>>60421418
>Ryzen 14 and 10 cores
Extreme Doubt
CCXs need to be even

>>60421132

Fair enough, but lets now compare the highest end E5-2xxx chip and the 6950x (which looks like they're based off the same die from the specs):

http://ark.intel.com/compare/94456,92984

Consumers pay an 80% premium for a higher clockspeed but higher TDP, and faster memory support but less quantity supported.

Thus, once again I would estimate $1499.99 as a minimum starting price for the i9-7900x. To be honest the closer I look at it I might be more comfortable pricing it event higher, say $1750 and up.

Then for the i9-7920x I would move that price up to $2499.99.

>>60419811
Meh tier unless the 7820X OCs well.

I thought Intel was taking Ryzen seriously, this is weaksauce.

>>60421251
>>60421273
Didn't they get the threats because they bragged on a live stream about how they ran other programs while benching Ryzen to get lower results.

>>60421456
They deserve death for that.

>>60421472
The single threat they showed off was telling them to get cancer

>>60421166
They can't match AMD prices because then they'll have some serious fucking explaining to do to their enterprise customers. They'll either need to bullshit like no one ever has before, or ALSO lower prices in their most lucrative market.

File: Screenshot_20170430-113937.jpg (185KB, 1079x1077px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1079x1077px

>>60421564
They can't match prices because AMD is stringing together smaller dies to make larger ones.

Intel can have a 28 core monolithic 700mm2 range die all they want. All AMD has to do is paste four 195mm2 dies together and call it a day. All while getting better performance scaling than a ring bus, at a cost exponentially lower, as price per chip rises extremely rapidly as area increases.

>>60419811
Oh look, another socket.

File: 1494046109724.jpg (58KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x500px

lel AMD won this gen and probably many more
They fucking did it guys

I'm betting $700 starting point

$399 price point

-t.Intel employee

File: new hat.jpg (26KB, 500x386px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 500x386px

>throw two i7s in one package
>NEW i9 DON'T LOOK OVER THERE AT THAT CHEAPER FASTER AMD PART

>>60421796
>tfw you live long enough to see AMD survive Bulldozer and come back on top

Feels good.

>Intel is now the wait and more cores company
I want off mr. trump's wild timeline

File: 6ffvzdn3_large.png (72KB, 580x320px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 580x320px

>>60421847
Maybe for the 7640K

File: Enough!!.png (273KB, 600x583px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 600x583px

Where the fuck are my next gen, low energy processors??

File: netburst.jpg (25KB, 545x397px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 545x397px

This is now a /g/ related nostalgia thread. Post nostalgic images.

I'll start.

File: Intel-Working-on-7nm-and-5-nm-Manufacturing-Technologies-3.jpg (312KB, 1688x795px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1688x795px

>>60421907

File: 1490632352923.png (1MB, 1110x5110px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1110x5110px

>>60421904
They're here, and they're red

File: intelvsamd-970-80.jpg (73KB, 970x543px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 970x543px

>meanwhile a Ryzen 9 will be like 5% slower for half the cost yet people will bitch about how shit it is for not being 50% faster than Intel for half the cost

Currently on a 4770K, will probably upgrade when the new chips drop and we get concrete price and performance data

>>60421904
In smartphones. Dock and you can use desktop keyboard, monitor and mouse.

>>60421866

If it were a level playing field and vendors were allowed to ship AMD without penalty from the monopolists, the world would be a better place.

File: news010613_2.png (26KB, 600x275px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x275px

>>60421907
Kek.

>>60421942
>5% slower

Yeah, slower at artificial benchmarks optimized for Intel.

>>60421922
>2013 14nm
>2015 10nm
Man they really lost the plot, Q4 2017 for 10nm laptop, 2019 for 10nm desktop

>>60421969
But Ryzen was the opposite. It did better in synthetics but was a little bit slower in real world scenarios (granted mostly games, in productivity and actual work they are very good)

>>60421985
And we got 14nm in fucking 2016, three years late

>>60421985

Didn't they recently proclaim that tick-tock is dead? Then AMD comes along and kicks their ass at IPC and process. Pretty funny, Intel deserves to get their ass kicked for sitting on that overpriced trash for so long.

AMD must be getting some good coin from the consoles to put into R'D.

>>60422020
2015

>>60421942
Bruh, AMD's 8-cores come close to beating Intel's 10-core HEDT processor. That 16-core beast is going to rip Intel a new asshole.

>>60422037
Laptops don't count for anything, they're mainly just proof of concepts that get 20 min better battery life and nothing else of importance.

>>60422024
They went to tick-tick-tock a few years back

>>60422040
>Bruh, AMD's 8-cores come close to beating Intel's 10-core HEDT processor
Not in multitasking. It should come close in single threaded tasks because it's newer

>>60422055

They went to kick-cuck process.

>>60419811
>Core i9

Is this a joke? There was never supposed to be an "i9", retards have been talking about such a thing ever since the i3/5/7 debut, but it was just babble. The i7 is the top line of Intel CPUs, "i9" just doesn't make any sense.

File: tick-tock-pao.png (499KB, 1228x362px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 1228x362px

>>60422055
Kek. They aren't even following their replacement anymore.

File: 1429937263876.jpg (15KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 320x320px

>>60422086
It's 2017. All the memes are becoming real.

File: 1488882685060.jpg (101KB, 576x1024px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 576x1024px

>>60422086
Welcome to the chaos timeline

>>60422066
It beats Intel's HEDT in single threaded applications. It matches or beats the 6900k in pretty much every multithreaded task. AMD's 16-core processors are going to wreck everything Intel has on offer for people who actually buy that kind of shit.

>>60422051
5775C was a thing

No one bought it and it was hardly manufactured but it was a thing

>>60422024
>>60422055
It's called
Process (Broadkek)
Architecture (Skylel)
Optimization (Babylake)

then they were gonna have Cannonlake be the new Process cycle, followed by Icelake then Tigerlake.

But then they fucked up their 10nm process, and the desktop Cannonlakes got cancelled like Broadwell. So they introduced Coffeelake on 14nm which they claim will have "Cannonlake technology", despite Cannonlake being just a Skylake die shrink from the beginning. Then the server chips got cancelled too, so it's up in the air what happens after Skylake-E. Intel might not introduce a new server chip line until late 2019 / early 2020 which would absolutely decimate them. Or they could do something like Kabylake-E or Coffeelake-E, but they're out of die space on 14nm already so it would only be a trivial clock bump which would piss off server companies anyways.

>>60422234
>5775C was a thing
Oh shit you're right, lel I totally forgot about it.

>>60422086
They are pulling the "hurr, muh i9 nao" card in response to Ryzen, just as they pulled the P4EE card in response to the Athlon64 14 years ago.

>>60422024
>>60422055
>>60422101
>>60422234
Almost forgot the "Hyperscaling" meme they tried to pull as well. Charlie tears that to shreds more eloquently than I ever could.
http://semiaccurate.com/2017/04/04/intels-hyperscaling-is/

>>60422086
welcome to the Ryzen effect
- releasing a Pentium with HT
- releasing an unlocked i3
- moving Skylake-X and Cannonlake forward
- adding more megaherz and more cores at housefire wattages
- releasing a 4c/4t i7

intel probably wanted to use a new name for the top line of processors since Ryzen did beat (sometimes) the i7.

>>60422337
Skylake-E wasn't moved forwards, they actually intended to launch it in early January. Last minute (as in a week or two before it shipped) they discovered serious bugs in the AVX-512 implementation and xpoint compatibility issues. So they shipped off their production lot up until then to Google and Amazon exclusively and delayed Skylake-E by six months for every other consumer.

Cannonlake they did move up though, by, what do you know, skimping on bugtesting.

https://danluu.com/cpu-bugs/

>>60421907
Why the fuck was it called "NetBurst" anyway? It had literally fuck-all to do with networking specifically. Or was it just marketeers that came up with that term because everyone's priority was connecting to the internet back then? Pretty much the same can be said of MS "dotNET" btw, what does it have to do with "net"?

>>60422086
They have kept the "i9" label in reserve for emergency situations, just as a combat jet pilot has an afterburner available to use if necessary.

>>60422521
You pretty much answered your own question, Anon. Engineers make the technology, then execs, marketeers and salesmen come up with a retarded name that they believe will sell the product in the current market situation, and slap it onto it.

>>60422521
>>60422585
Actual internal codename for the arch was P68

Will those 12 cores AMDs be launched on a different board than X370? I wonder if I should get those instead of a 1700.

>>60421904
What is Core M.

>>60420112
cucks

File: [HorribleSubs] Gabriel DropOut - 09 [720p].mkv_snapshot_05.28_[2017.05.13_21.17.13].jpg (63KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1280x720px

>mfw he doesn't have retail edge to buy intel cpus for cheap
Who's laughing now, faggots?

>>60423060
Yeah it's a different board. Too big to fit on the 8 core board.

It's alright market segmentation, Naples (32 core) and Snowy Owl (16 core) on a big socket, Summit Ridge (Ryzen) and Raven Ridge (4 core APU) on a medium socket, K12 (ARM) on a small

yfw you bought into LGA 1151 meme

File: RoadFlare.png (15KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 250x250px

>>60419811
>So anyone want to take a stab at prices
Lets extrapolate from current price delta between tiers
i5-7600k $240
i7-7700k $350
that's about 45% (350/240)
350*1.45=507.50
>We're Intel® so just round up to an even 510
$510 minimum for the base model i9
since it;s not just adding HT but 2 physical cores, I imagine it will be $40-90 more expensive if not higher.
Thoughts?

>>60423279
Doesn't hold up with the i3 or Pentiums

>>60420080
I paid $250 for a 1700. $400 for a 6C/12T CPU is highway robbery

>>60419811
>New processor line
>Literally just Skylake X which would have been called i7 if it weren't for AMD calling their HEDT processors R9
Looks like Intel's marketing trick is working, and they haven't even released anything yet.

>>60421026
To be fair the AMD one would have less performance on top of that to, but that's besides the point. When software actually catches up and patches itself or AMD I honestly believe is going to be a jump in AMD's performance across the board but it's going to be years. Intel's performances right now. And that's coming from someone with the 1700

Finally something to upgrade to from my 4770k

>>60423724
>>60423618
>>60423527
>>60423513
>>60423498
>>60423279
>>60423149
>>60423099
>>60423088
>>60423060
>>60422559
>>60422521
>>60422417
>>60422337
>>60422336
>>60422293
>>60422234
Besides gaming and my production in a/v realms, why is this hotvshit y'all? Is it cool dudes?
t.a /pol/lack & /k/ommando fag

>>60423858
What? Fuck off this board you monkey.

>>60423892
Don't you gotta watch your mouth son? Ain't this a SFW board? Any who.....
What's the purpose of a faster processor? What task will be improved?

>>60423931
You should probably rope yourself.

>>60419811
But will they have mITX mobos available for them? The 7820x looks tempting but for now the only way to get 8c/16t in mITX is ryzen.

File: 1493493308112.gif (553KB, 500x395px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 500x395px

>>60423948
>>60423948
>>60423948
>>60423948
>>60423948
>>60423948
>>60423948

>>60423498
Those are business class office chips for telemarketers, and dad builds

>it's another no new technology episode

>>60419811
i9?
more like $999 right?

>>60421044
more like intel aviv.

1700, 999, 599, 399 (12 core thru 6)

>>60422521
Netburst was right around the '99 dotcom era

>>60425858
I think you're underestimating shekelburg

Well, I'll say that going haswell hasn't disappointed me when I built my last PC, which still runs fucking great.

So my next one is still going to be Intel, and I hope they prosper. Ryzen wasn't all that exciting to me. I've been using AMD processors since Athlon XP until I got this haswell and I have to say I had no shortage of problems.

>>60426148
Thanks for sharing your experiences, Bill.

Right guys,

So I run an ancient 2500k.

Should I buy a 1700 or 7700k? Or should I wait till later in the year

>>60426383
What are you planning to do with your PC?
Getting 7700k will give you higher single core frequency and is more favourable for low thread software.
1700 will have little improvement over 2500k in single core performance, making it more of a side grade in that regard, but will make multithreaded software run significantly faster.
Choose hardware for the software.

>>60419811
Why would I want above 6 Cores?

There has got to be a miniscule number of programs that benefit from 24 fucking threads.

>>60426485
Only really play games to be honest.

I use matlab and CAD and stuff but nothing intensive

File: IMG_2558.jpg (504KB, 2094x1242px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 2094x1242px

>>60426383
7700k

>>60426519
Then go for 7700k, Zen+ maybe will bring higher clock for AMD but as for now, there is no competition in that field.

File: 124.jpg (52KB, 1099x317px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1099x317px

>>60426551
>>60426522
Okay cool thanks. So I'll just need a new mobo and ram to go along with it.

Is this a good choice?

>>60426582
Go to >>60422552 this guys probably will give more meaningful advice on actual hardware and keeps this thread on topic.

>>60426582
Yes. Alternatively, look up gskill trident z (3200mhz) if you're willing to pay £12 more for 200mhz and RGB

>>60426670
>>60426623
Sweet, thanks guys

Finally we got competition in the x86 division from both sides, hope this gets better and cheaper options soon... But I wouldn't count on it with Intel

>>60419972
>My 2600k will keep on kicking for the meantime
I know this feel. I swear the 2500k/2600k are never gonna die. Going to be a full decade soon.

File: AMDRyzen1800XIntel6950X1_0.png (29KB, 617x837px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 617x837px

>>60422066

File: IMG_3219.png (55KB, 802x601px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 802x601px

>>60427038
Now try a real world benchmark

File: 1492587863785.jpg (395KB, 2400x2000px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 2400x2000px

>>60426522
1700 overclocked

File: IMG_3366.jpg (995KB, 2159x1216px) Image search: [Google]

995KB, 2159x1216px

>>60427097
Nice GPU bottleneck faggot

File: mark.jpg (1MB, 1505x4363px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1505x4363px

>>60427063
>Using gaymen benchmarks
>For HEDT CPUs
You are the single most shameless shekelchaser in the history of /g/. Literally no one buys a $1650 CPU for gayming. The benchmarks I posted ARE real world benchmarks for HEDT.

And the 1800x comes close to tying the $1,650 6950X. And beats the $1,000 6900k.

File: perfrel_cpu.png (31KB, 500x610px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x610px

>>60427122

File: rottr_1920_1080.png (21KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x330px

>>60427122
>>60427172

File: 1494133998797_0.png (139KB, 778x588px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 778x588px

>>60427122
>>60427182

File: 1462681591668.jpg (2KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 100x100px

>>60420179

>>60427163
>handbrake
>cinebench

What part of real world do you not understand you dumb indian?

>>60427172
>>60427182
>>60427192
>testing cpu performance with a bottleneck GPU (rx480)

Only indians can be this stupid

>>60426522
Only if you play competitive CSGO

File: 1481744513695.png (349KB, 716x2588px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 716x2588px

>>60427211

File: u28ZhDPMdhIggnhMYMlvQRnbYxyAM76jk5_8KrNzqqI.jpg (148KB, 768x504px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 768x504px

>>60427231
Better than the Nvidia drivers bottlenecking the AMD CPU. Pic related.

File: 20170508132413241324.png (63KB, 801x600px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 801x600px

>>60427211
>>60427274

File: 85876_0.png (44KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 650x350px

>>60427211
>>60427293

File: 85882.png (37KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 650x350px

>>60427211
>>60427304

>>60427211
>>60427211
>What part of real world do you not understand you dumb indian?
Don't try to reason with him, he's a literal Indian with an inferiority complex who will never admit that he's wrong. He'll just post cherry picked images over and over and ignore the fact that in everything that matters his CPU is shittier. It's cheaper, it might be a better value for some people, I get that, but he'll never, ever concede that it's worse in most relevant cases.

File: 1433276589653.gif (2MB, 388x356px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 388x356px

Intel netburst 2.0

File: 1488678336902.png (408KB, 882x1418px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 882x1418px

>>60427231
>>60427289

File: Untitledd.png (36KB, 633x613px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 633x613px

>>60427316

File: IMG_3452.jpg (100KB, 873x758px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 873x758px

>>60427289

>IT'S GAMES FAULT
>IT'S WINDOWS FAULT
>IT'S NVIDIAS FAULT
>IT'S RAMS FAULT
>IT'S DXS FAULT
>IT'S INTELS FAULT

Or maybe your CPUs are just shit?

File: Screenshot_20170418_142236.png (55KB, 804x1036px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 804x1036px

>>60427316
>>60427331

File: 1491062981332.png (130KB, 1597x634px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1597x634px

>>60427331
>>60427350

File: Comb20042017122425.jpg (586KB, 1920x1754px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 1920x1754px

>>60427331
>>60427354

>>60427331
>>60427350
Why is intel such garbage?

>>60419811
Do I have to get a new motherboard for these or will a 250 chipset work? Can I just swap my current Kaby Lake with one of these?

>>60427385
Amd is dropping the 1800x already and changing the chipset for their new cpoos

>Intel
>Got blueprints from IBM
>didn't want to deviate at all from them
>AMD found more optimal way of doing things right away
>Cyrix backwards engineered a better x86 CPU than what Intel ever could
>Only way Intel could survive was shady business tactics

Intel was always 10 years behind competition.

This is a large reason people are excited for Amd's new CPU even if they aren't buying one, it's a new architecture, something Intel lately hasn't done for... since the Pentium 3... so Intel has been floating along on the back of Pentium 3 nearly 20 years, and will be over 20 by the time they make something new, while AMD has had 3 different cores in that time frame with 2 of them being good, one of them being good for specific applications for a short time, would likely still be good enough today if they released full desktop variants but fuck it, when gamers are concerned its hard to argue in favor of construction and cat cores.

Throughout the entirety of the bulldozer base, look at what AMD did gen over gen... and now look at Ryzen, and imagine it to be Bulldozer levels of optimization left to happen. now realize Ryzen currently on engineering samples that throw errors like a mother fucker, is within/over 5% IPC of Intel's current CPU.

1/2

File: infagismad.png (15KB, 603x197px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 603x197px

>>60427380
not even same person

>>60427380
>GIBE ME MONI OR I REPORT YOU
Crying baby.

File: 1492842903517.jpg (2MB, 3840x1032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x1032px

>>60427364
Because they lazy rent seeking bastards who were content to just keep releasing 4c/8t refreshes forever.

>>60427406
Throughout the entirety of the bulldozer base, look at what AMD did gen over gen... and now look at Ryzen, and imagine it to be Bulldozer levels of optimization left to happen. now realize Ryzen currently on engineering samples that throw errors like a mother fucker, is within/over 5% IPC of Intel's current CPU.

I cant wait to see if either there is a performance stand still, you can't get much faster than Intel is, or if we have been rammed up the ass by Intel for so long we forgot they were even there and its only now that we finally see real vagina we remember a cock is still lodged up our asses.

Intel has way more fuckups than Bulldozer, Bulldozer is AMD's only spectacular fuckup in the CPU market in 40 years, the only other minor fuckup was Phenom which was not even a architecture fuckup since it was fixed in B3 stepping, the other fuckup was K5.
But these are fucking nothing compared to Presshot, Itanium, Larabee, iAPX 432, and their own fuckup with P5 FDIV that wasn't nicely fixed with a stepping, but a fucking recall.
What about their complete failure with the Atom? What an abortion, mobile market? 14nm and lower lithography woes where they allowed their competitors that were lagging 4 years to close the gap to less than a year?

These magnificent failures would destroy 5 companies over, it's a good thing Intel has more money than sense to live through it all.

2/2

>>60427350
>>60427361
>>60427417
>gpu bottleneck

>>60419811
I do think and hope the 6c/12t will solve the stuttering issues. I hope.

File: sniperelite4_1920_1080_min.png (19KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 500x330px

>>60427439

File: IMG_3211.jpg (620KB, 2150x1240px) Image search: [Google]

620KB, 2150x1240px

>>60427461
>gpu bottleneck

>>60427461
Nevermind just realised you bullpooed the graph

>>60422336
I think it's funny that they hide yields under "trade secrets".

File: 1492103803448.png (104KB, 582x1048px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 582x1048px

>>60427474

>>60427628
POOZEN 1800X DESTROYED BY HASWELL i5

HAHAHAHAHA

>>60427641
>Hurr Durr what are minimums?
Enjoy your s-st-tu-tering

File: Screenshot_from_03052017_210306.png (37KB, 661x447px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 661x447px

>>60427474
>>60427628

File: Screenshot_from_03052017_210430.png (36KB, 658x435px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 658x435px

>>60427656
>>60427641
>>60427656

>>60421999
Most games run just fine on the Pentium G. Not much of a point in getting processors with lots of cores if you're not going to use them.

>>60427667
>>60427687
>Screenshot
yeah, all you can do is cherrypick these because it's easy to see that this shit is fucking meaningless when you look at the full data set from any given article

m-muh scary graphs
>i-i-i-if i post something sufficiently ambiguous from the perspective of most bystanders, it'll look like I'm right!
>>60427417
why do you do this
why do you torture yourself?
are you a bot? a shill?

or are you just lying to yourself in an effort to rationalize a purchase you've

File: 86360.png (28KB, 650x337px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 650x337px

>>60427733

File: 1430076400101.jpg (24KB, 549x471px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 549x471px

Jesus fucking Christ all these graphs, Intel CPUs are complete failures compared to Ryzen.

File: image.png (112KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 800x800px

>>60427317
DELETE THIS

>>60427768
1080p gaming using Nvidia GPUs to deliberately bottleneck the Ryzen CPUs is literally the only leg the shekelchasers have left to stand on.

If Vega is even half decent it is likely to end up looking quite bad for Intel, as AMD's own DX12/Vulkan drivers won't bottleneck Ryzen CPUs the way Nvidia's do.

>>60419811
>AMD just beat us at HEDT how do we respond?
>Add 2 more cores, change the 7 to a 9 and hope the stupid plebs don't notice their components are catching fire.

If love to see Intel panicked again once AMD releases Zeppelin as HEDT.

>>60427768
>>60427842
And, of course, kiketel shekelchasers keep diverting these threads back to 1080p gaming comparisons between the 1800x and 7700k because Skylake-X is a DOA abortion. It simply has no chance of being able to compete on price or performance against AMD's upcoming 12-core and 16-core HEDT CPUs.

Will this work with Kaby Lake motherboards?

File: makesyouthink.png (388KB, 677x677px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 677x677px

>>60428148
H150 is best suited for 7700k since Intel tells everyone to stop OC their goddamn K-processor

>>60419811

Wow is there actually a 12C? I really want that so that I can compress memes more easily.

>>60428177
You could just buy a Xeon. It'd probably be cheaper, too.

>>60419811
>So anyone want to take a stab at prices for the i9 series from Intel?

Too high to be competitive with offerings from AMD, as anything low enough to be competitive would invalidate their entire existing product line and all stock of it.

File: 1425130621386.gif (134KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 340x340px

>tfw intel cuck'd (you) with 4 corelets for so many years and (you) enjoyed

>>60428205

I thought xeons have low clock speeds

>>60428239
That's the case with high core count processors in general, I think.

i3 -> i5
i5 -> i7
i7 -> i9

Suck them up like a good goy

>>60428290
Also Pentium -> i3.

>>60428316
so
>atom -> pentium
?
i hate jewtel

>>60421136
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybF7r4rogHc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11NfsMykyAk&t=4s

>>60428316
>>60428316
No Pentium and Celeron are Atom now :3
I had a fried coming to tell me he had bout a quad core intel notebook and was excited about it. Then I googled the CPU model I haven't heard about and turns out it was an Atom. I got astonished that hardware sellers are getting away with putting smartphone processors in a computer and charge 500 USD for it (in my country).

>>60428620
celerons you idiot

>>60429626
no, Atom line is separate from pentium and celerons

>>60429918
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldmont

>>60429918
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Celeron-N3050-Notebook-Processor.146637.0.html

>>60423858
get yourself a tripcode if you want attention you mouthbreathing dumbfuck

I purchased a 4770K 4 years ago for £280. It now costs £330. WTF is up with that?

>>60428758
Well they used a Novideo GPU it was bound to look the same.

>>60420147
kek

>>60426383
i think you can safely wait for zen+

>i9
>not 9 cores