>mfw the average Linux user laughs about Wannacry but he uses

File: 1478725650426.jpg (8KB, 200x193px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 200x193px

>>60385079
wow yeah you sure got them anon! how'd you learn to do that ^-^

>>60385079
Tell me one reasone why I should not use systemd

>>60385186
it's sneaky

>>60385079
I like systemd

>>60385079
nothing wrong with systemd

File: tmp_6726-1493904667395903727758.png (657KB, 922x719px) Image search: [Google]

657KB, 922x719px

>>60385079
>implying systemd isn't Free(Libre) software
>implying FSF-approved distros don't have systemd

File: linuxtorvals.jpg (47KB, 619x442px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 619x442px

>>60385079
>>60385186
>>60385535
>>60385677


I'd just like to interject for a moment and point out that, Ironically, systemd wouldn't exist today if we had been using systemd's design philosophy on GNU/Linux from the beginning. In other words, we'd be stuck with outdated technology and only able to replace it if we created another monolithic init system that interacted with everything in exactly the same way systemd does.

Systemd is exploiting the flexibility of its predecessors in order to kill the flexibility we have in the area of init systems. People might like it now, but we're walking into a walled garden.
If systemd becomes the standard and everything depends on it, there likely won't be any competition ever again. It would be an extremely monumental task to try and create a systemd alternative.

Newbies here support systemd because they think "it just werks". What they fail to consider -- because init systems probably aren't on their radar to begin with -- is that the reason we all use GNU/Linux in the first place is for the flexibility to do things _ OUR _ way rather than in a way dictated by someone who wants to control us to benefit their own interests.

>babby learns new linux werds

File: g_-_-x-_-_-_59517x20141202141751_0.png (846KB, 853x853px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 853x853px

>>60385079

The FSF is a joke.

But I'm runit master race

File: 1490964319693.png (253KB, 453x426px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 453x426px

>>60385079
>mfw I use an openrc distro

>>60385737

actually stallman isnt kidding

http://stallman.org/guantanamero.ogg

File: 1494460583864.jpg (39KB, 400x470px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 400x470px

wew since when does *every* distro use systemd as a init system?

>>60385731
However, systemd doesn't hold your files for a ransom, and still allows way more flexibility than Windows. If you think it's an evil conspiracy, do your thing, however it by far isn't on the level of ransomware.

>>60385079
>FSF approved distro
Oh no! Proprietary software is just as bad as holding all your files for ransom! Also what non-systemd distros are even FSF approved?

Feel free to hate on systemd and non-FSF distros but it's way better than Windows and infinitely better than ransomware.

File: IMG-20170506-WA0009.jpg (73KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1280x800px

jokes on you i use fsf approved distro
what now faggot

>>60385734
is that a pcmcia card?

>OpenRC
try again Wangblows shill

I don't get it.
Doesn't encrypting an HDD take forever and use a shitload of resources?
Why couldn't they notice the CPU usage going through the roof?

File: muhgnu.png (550KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

550KB, 1920x1440px

>>60385079
>not approved by the FSF

did I miss anything?

>>60385731
That's a good pasta

>>60385079
>Mfw i installed a non systemd distro a while ago.

The experience was shit