Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
A web-browser analysis:
Based on my thoughts, opinions and experience.
Opera internet browser:
Pros:
> Most innovative / best innovations
> Most features / best features
> Customizable shortcuts
> Floating youtube feature.
> Built-in features.
> A very good sidebar
> Uses chromium engine
> Can use chrome extensions which is the most popular web-browser to develop extensions these days. High quality.
> Good and customizable speed-dial page compared with for example Chrome which is more locked browser.
Cons:
> Not overall as fast as Chrome
> Arguable not as beautiful as chrome
> Not very customizable with look due to hidden code-source
> Not as reliable with HTML and certain web-pages as chrome and firefox.
Conclusion: This is the web-browser for more experienced and advanced users, who needs for instance customize shortcuts.
More freedom than Google-chrome. Suitable for someone that looks after a web-browser that do more than "just werks".
Google chrome
Pros:
> Simplicity
> Reliable
> Beautiful due to simplicity
> Overall fastest
> High quality extensions and overall very popular
Cons:
> Not customizable. Hidden source code.
> Simplicity is not always good, especially for for advanced users. It's both a pro and a con.
> Rely on extensions to be usable
Conclusion:
While Opera and Chrome both are very similar, Chrome is definitely much more simple and user-friendly. Perfect for end-users. Also being beautiful, it's easy to see why this is the most used web-browser to this day. However, it's not perfect.
Just werks, all the time.
Mozilla Firefox.
Pros:
> Highly customizable, also with look
> Open source
> Big library of addons
> Unique
> Can be lightweight
Cons:
> Slow
> Outdated addons due to its fall in popularity
> Tries to copy chrome instead of being mozilla.
Conclusion:
Suitable for people who loves to customize or have special needs. Also great for people who love open source. Suitable for more advanced users.
Agree or disagree?
>>
Vivaldi?
>>
>>60339128
chrome skin
>>
>>60339047
Isn't the current version of Opera pretty much shit compared to Chrome and even Firecucks?
>>
>>60339382
I would say the current version of Opera is the best Opera version so far.
>>
>>60339428
How's the RAM usage? Chrome and Vivaldi rape my RAM.
>>
>>60339498
Same concept as Google-Chrome. Every tab acts like its own process that use some memory.
Therefore, the RAM usage is pretty similar. I have no numbers and test-results though.
>>
>Opera
>Letting the Chinese monitor you
Nah ill pass.
>>
File: vivaldi memory abuse.png (27KB, 682x247px) Image search:
[Google]
27KB, 682x247px
>>60339530
In theory, but in practice I max out my 16GB of RAM with Chromium until I open like 500 tabs, with Vivaldi it starts shitting itself after only 70 or so tabs.
>>
>>60339377
if only it had sync I would switch from Chrome
>>
>>60339531
Still better than the muricans
>>
File: 12079699_1669257516653274_283149159054148074_n.png (442KB, 538x573px) Image search:
[Google]
442KB, 538x573px
What is keeping me in chrome is the horrible scrolling in firefox that makes it feel like it's 1999 again it's so fucking slow and sluggish
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3