>claims a program being open-source it's good
>doesn't even check the code
Now this really makes you think
I could if I wanted to, that's what makes being open source good, numbnuts. It's the difference between being a shut-in and being a prisoner. A shut-in has the choice to go outside.
>>60322109
No need to check the code since there are an army of freetards to do it for you anyway...
>>60322204
Which is what every freetard thinks, leaving no army to check it.
>>60322236
Nah, they really do it.
They scream "botnet" or "bloat" to anything they find strange, easy to use or popular.
Might not be the best way but there's always someone competent enough in there to look at the code and tell exactly what it does.
>>60322109
>Use program
>Find bug
Proprietary:
>Give up
>Spend money and time making a support ticket for the bug, but the bug is never fixed
FOSS
>Look at source code
>Fix bug
>Send patch to maintainer
>Use fixed version of code even if maintainer doesn't respond