THERE'S NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DIFFERENT MOTHERBOARDS LALALALALALA

Shitposting aside, can this difference in max/min scores be anything more than how motherboards handle P-states?

>>60281703
Yes, goy. Buy only the motherboards which says "gayming" on the box.

>>60281703
>ASSrock is the best
What planet am I on again?

>>60281833
Welcome to a few years ago and recently welcome to 2 months ago, where Gigabyte and ASUS have the worst boards and ASrock and MSI have the best boards.

>>60281833
CH6 might be better but the Taichi has the best hardware for the price by far.

>>60281914
>MSI have the best boards

No.

https://youtu.be/9t6LP9glKmc?t=589

Maybe for B350 though, not sure.

>>60281946
Some ASUS/ASrock/MSI b350 boards are more than enough to OC even a 8 core Ryzen

File: Tamara_.jpg (65KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x600px

>>60281703
>avg. framerate range of only 3.7 fps
>minimum framerate range of only 4.7 fps
>maximum framerate range of 11.4 fps, all very much more than two times above 60 fps anyway

Wow, it's literally NOTHING!

File: 7777_76_asrock-x99-taichi-intel-motherboard-review.png (30KB, 570x1121px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 570x1121px

>>60281753
>can this difference in max/min scores be anything more than how motherboards handle P-states?

it's not even that, the motherboards that do well tend to ignore intel's spec for turbo settings and either allow an extra core to go higher than it should (according to intel) or bump the turbo speed up by an additional 100mhz - my motherboard both sets an extra core high and bumps the turbo speed up by 100mhz but some boards might only do one of these or neither, motherboard manufacturers have been doing this for years which is why *reputable* companies that review products will lock processor core/uncore and memory speeds to test them, in which case there's *barely* a few % difference on synthetic tests never mind in gaming tests

pic related, at a glance can you spot the winner and do you really give a shit that it's 3.3% better than the worst on the list? pic in the second post will be a gaming benchmark which will have a 1.6% difference between best and worst

the only motherboard benchmark results that are relevant are usually for things like storage controllers, lan, wifi speeds, usb speeds, etc, because how the motherboard manufacturer designs the board and routes pcie lanes from either the chipset or cpu can have a huge impact in performance in these areas - the x99 platform for instance only offers gen2 pcie lanes in the pch so if a board decides to use pch lanes for the m.2 connector (which many do/did) you'll only get gen2 x4 pcie lane performance out of your m.2 ssd which can have a measurable performance difference over a board that uses pcie lanes from the cpu which are gen3 - some x99 boards (mostly gigabyte ones) only offer 10gbps performance on the m.2 slot which is gen2 x2 for instance

>>60281914

honestly asus has been hit or miss since at least sandy bridge days, they'll do some great boards but you'll start to find plenty of one particular type of asus board on ebay for a particular socket that is defective for whatever reason

>>60281703
These differences are within statistical error rates.

File: 7777_78_asrock-x99-taichi-intel-motherboard-review.png (28KB, 570x1120px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 570x1120px

>>60281753
>>60282081

and pic related is the gaming benchmark, note the winner isn't the same as the one for the synthetic test

processor p states, turbo speeds, memory speeds etc are all so well defined and standardised to manufacturers now that it's *incredibly* rare for a motherboard to perform badly (and when it is it's not by 3-5% which is arguably within a margin of error), the only way motherboard manufacturers can compete now is by going out of spec for the turbo/memory speed settings or by doing something like allowing overclocking on chipsets intel doesn't want you overclocking on

basically motherboard reviews are more niche than ever and likely won't tell you much unless it's doing something stupid or makes for a really bad overclocking board

>>60282077
>wow it's literally nothing
>meanwhile fags are literally tearing their hair apart over 1% FPS differences

>>60282116
>FPS
You need to be over 18 to post on this site.

>>60281703
>Tomscuckware
Stopped reading there.

>>60281703
Who gives a fuck nerd?