You know shit's going down when even the most normalshit

>>60277356
Did Intel fire their marketing division along with quality shills and validation teams? Because recent 'do not overclock le ebin overclocker SKUs' fuckup is nothing to sneeze about.

but it's a better workstation pc. dell and hp etc. should already be pumping boatloads of these systems

File: Intel_Antitrust_Wide.png (223KB, 760x427px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 760x427px

>>60277356
Time for the ol' OEM grease.

>>60277398
OEM Ryzen systems are Q2, Lisa Su confirmed it a week ago.
So not yet, probably E3 or Computex

>>60277356
most normies should be good enough with a g4560. ryzen is a jump for their money.

>>60277418
R3 isn't out yet.

>>60277428
Neither is Raven Ridge.

>>60277388
Why would they fire their marketing divison? Where would they put their new H1B hires and diversity quotas hires? Certainly not in engineering.

>>60277471
It certainly got worse.

>>60277471
Bad marketing is worse than no marketing

See: AMD

>>60277356
All this means is that AMD gave BestBuy some deal which resulted in better profit margins on AMD Ryzen CPUs compared to Intel CPUs.

>>60277504
No, you can't get any worse than that.
http://www.pcgamer.com/intels-tells-core-i7-7700k-owners-to-stop-overclocking-to-avoid-high-temps/

I offered to get a ryzen tattoo for a system. should have took me up on that AMD

>>60277567
How can you get worse than calling something "THREADRIPPER"

https://warosu.org/g/?task=search&ghost=&search_text=threadripper

>>60277418
The G4560 is the only intel CPU left thats worth buying

>>60277418
A 1500x isnt that expensive

>>60277356
>massive hype for ayymd ryzen
>best buy pre-orders one billion units
>benchmarks shows ryzen btfo by old intlel cpus
>"hmm how do we get rid off all these useless cpus with poor performance..."
>goes on twitter to market it as the best cpu for gaymen

>>60277412
>0 days without jewish tricks

>>60277638
can you provide source for its poor performance?

>>60277638
>benchmarks shows ryzen btfo by old intlel cpus
I see Intel drones are still pulling lies out of their ass. Show any info to support that. And no, video games do not count as a CPU workload.

>>60277697
I hope you like 1080p GAYMAN benchmarks.

>>60277709
Don't forget heavy single threaded workloads which there aren't many of these days.

>>60277697
just look at any benchmark

>>60277707
gaming performance isn't relevant when they're marketing it for gaming...? okay...

>>60277418
You wont see many pentium systems on the normie market, all i3, i5 and i7s. And as such, Ryzen will offer far superior value.

File: fucku.jpg (11KB, 356x474px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 356x474px

>>60277599
Sounds fucking gnarly my lamish doodaroo

File: oyvey.jpg (118KB, 1286x724px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1286x724px

>>60277638
ITS LIKE ANUDDA SHOAH
REMEMBER THE 6GHZ THAT DIED IN THE RYZENCAUST

File: sth ryzen benches.png (2MB, 973x6115px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 973x6115px

>>60277755
>any benchmark

>>60277857
Oy-vey, why would you need more than 4 threads, goyim?

>>60277818
Most of the dirt cheap OEM stuff is garbage celerons that belong in a laptop.

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170507_091219.jpg (2MB, 1485x4363px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1485x4363px

>>60277755
>Any benchmark

>>60277471
>10nm slower than 14nm
It was engineering

>>60278305
10nm scales better at lower clocks than 14nm
14nm scales better at higher clocks

Different market segments

>>60278340
Hell fucking no, it literally means their 10nm clocks lower than 14nm. Again.

>>60277356
AMD stock shills making thread #194903

>>60278377
Look at GloFo's/Samsung 14nm LPP, it scales phenomenally up to 3.6GHz, anything above that it's shit scaling.
It's a mobile process. like Intel's 10nm is, only later will 10nm get the same high frequency scaling like 14nm++

>>60278411
No, Intel's 10nm is still HP process. They failed to deliver again.

>>60278423
You're pulling shit, Intel always released a new process on dual core small chips and later (half year+) scaled it up to higher core counts when scaling increased

>>60278439
Because their yields are shit, not because they want to refine it.

>>60278474
Yields are always shit on a new node, but it's common sense that a virgin node can't clock as high as the previous optimized one can from the start.

>>60277871
no, those benchmark do not count
REEEEEEE