Ryzen R5 1400 vs i5-7400 Ryzen has 4cores, 8 THREADS so

pls respond

Spend slightly more on the 1500x or the 1600
The 1500x has twice the cache and higher clockspeed and the 1600 has twice the cash and 2 more cores
The i5 sucks

>>60259272
even 1400 is expensive for me
t. poor easter european

>>60259272
If the's not going to overclock the 1600x is better

>>60259280
then get some used old intel that still can keep up. no reason to buy new when on a budget.

>>60259287
But more expensive and doesnt come with a stock cooler (i think)
But youre right

>>60259280
FX8300 still holds up fairly well
The pentium 4620 is also nice for the price

>>60259211
90% of things can still only use 1 thread because programmers are lazy and do the bare minimum to get their shit launchworthy then go ADHD and never finish(they even have a gay little term for it: agile development)

>>60259352
That is mostly because jew bosses give deadlines.
But also I encountered so many shitty programmers, I worked with people that pay some shitty college and don't even know what what multithreading is.

>>60259372
The Indians are even worse, I had to train one with a "Masters Degree" in CS, and the poor poo didn't even know what a command line was.

>>60259211
If you're planning to play games, buy a G4560 and the GPU you can afford. Go for AMD for RX 470+. If you can't, go with Nvidia.

If you don't play gaymes, buy a 1400.

>>60259280
Then get some used i7 with 8 threads.

If you can't afford the 1600, just get an used i7.

File: intel-vs-ryzen-value.png (31KB, 780x371px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 780x371px

>>60259211
7400 (or 6400) is a better deal

File: oyvey.jpg (118KB, 1286x724px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1286x724px

>>60259589
>800x600_skyrim_benchmark.jpg