So basically we can conclude that Tineye (pic related) is a weak

>>60216316
The fuck o.O Shit that people put in their bellybutton nowadays

File: using_that_word.jpg (45KB, 500x420px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x420px

>>60216316
I found the wording of your post very strange, as if English were not your main language. If you were to avoid using the word "rise", and then try again, it may make more sense. Pic related.

>>60216428
Nah. RISE is an adverb for .... see thread. I don't want to type it 4 times again. How hard is it?. It doesn't look like Sanskrit to me.

>>60216428
Reverse
Image
Search
Engine

R
I
S
E

I fucking hate redditors who feel the need to acronym everything. It doesn't make you look smarter. reverse image search engine is takes 3 seconds to type.

>>60216316

Post pic, please!

File: af.png (66KB, 697x1163px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 697x1163px

>>60216984
>Racist Indecent, Sexist or Extremist

>>60217044
>I fucking hate redditors who feel the need to acronym everything
Fortunately, OP isn't a redditor.

>>60216779
>RISE is an adverb for

Acronym

Today I will not bully you, in return you must share the mercy and spare another anon from bullying in the future

>>60217044
Yeah but it doesn't capturing the RISING you feel when you upload some fapbait and the engine returns the whole set

>come to /g/ for tech discussion
>get grammer discussion instead

Google reverse image search surpassed Tineye literally years ago. Tineye is shit.

>>60219671
OP here, I'm originally from gaia =^______^=

Now I need source on that image ... just because. Snipping it and uploading it to Google reverse image search was not fruitful.

>>60216316
youre either trolling or legitimately retarded.
tineye is one of the best, alot better than google.

I use yandex's reverse search. Google heavily restricted reverse search of nude women or porn. I noticed that several times when I tried to find the source of something from 4chan. It's like if their algorithm thinks that there is a 1% chance that the girl is underage it doesn't show you any results at all. It's funking stupid. Oh, and you probably land on a list too.

>>60220465

Append &safe=off to the Google reverse search URL

>>60220349
>>60219813
Just use both you twats

>>60220535
That's not it. Safe Search is off and for some nudes I reverse search I get results. Just some months ago it started that some pics didn't give me any results at all. My guess is that they implemented some stupid algorithm that's supposed to guess the age of these women and if this algorithm has only slight doubts that she's over 18 you won't get any results at all.

>>60219813
Tineye wasn't even that good when it was on top. I remember trying to use it occasionally and just wishing that saucenao and iqdb did more than porn and anime.
Google reverse image search pretty much /threads this thread. Also I find DuckDuckGo's reverse image search is just as good.

What resources are there to read on how these systems work? For example iqdb and saucenau?

>>60221442
If I had 10 mins to write one I'd treshold the images and generate an ID based on black or white pixels at relative predetermined sample locations (every 1% up and down). Definitely mix in IDs of palettes etc as well to increase accuracy.

Post original pic, OP.

>>60221442
Any book on pattern recognition

>>60222326
That's a much broader topic.

>>60216360
TITS AND GTFO

the only good ones nowadays are yandex and saucenao
google's reverse image search went to shit last year or so

>>60216428
RISE is an acronym bro, hes doin it rite, read it again.

bum

>>60222452

>google's reverse image search went to shit last year or so

Longer than that. It started whenever lolberal college girls discovered that nothing is ever deleted from the internet.

>>60220639
Found the English major

File: 2017-05-05 08_42_31.jpg (115KB, 784x1138px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 784x1138px

yandex

>>60217956
OP here. What are you trying here kid?. Nobody listens to your non-sense.

>>60219753
>Today I will not bully you
You're a degenerate. Cant bully me kiddo.

>>60219813
I know but google rise is shit ass well. I mean Its not really an accurate search engine. It identifies objects in the picture and preforms a word-search based on that.

>>60220349
Pic related kiddy. Look at the result.

> Wicked-Weasel is quite a well known micro bikini brand.
> Yes I was looking for that model.
> Also: website watermark in the corner. Dates from 2015 etc etc. Its not really accurate.

>>60220639
>algorithm that's supposed to guess the age of a nude girl
I wonder how they trained it.

>>60220465
Nah it was indeed from 4ch but the model is not underaged. I have nothing to hide so they do their best and I keep doing what I do. Yandex is a great alternative: why didn't I think about that earlier.

> Tbh: I was actually looking for software or other NEXT lvl options. Something where you can cut out a face of a picture and use that to find matching images etc etc.

>>60220535
>&safe=of
http://images.google.com/&safe=of ?

>>60226446
https://images.google.com/?<other-stuff>&safe=off
https://images.google.com/?safe=off

>>60226466

No the end of the URL

Then compare the results with this:
http://i.4cdn.org/d/1493602463593s.jpg

>>60226476
No.

>>60226488

choose your own url then you pussy. I figured a random /d/ image would suffice and it did but you're too much of a fag to see for yourself

>>60226502
I'm not the person asking for help. I'm showing him how to properly append safe=off.

>>60226506

Well you're no better. You literally add it to the end of the URL and it works

http://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url=http%3A%2F%2Fi.4cdn.org%2Fd%2F1493602463593s.jpg&safe=off

>>60226518
I literally properly added it to the URL he posted in my post.

Gonna try yandex after reading this thread

>>60226518
You also need to URI encode the URL.
That can be done with the javascript function encodeURI("http://yourfuckingurlhere.com/dicks.jpg")

>>60228232

Why?

>>60228251
Because certain characters have certain meanings, and need to be escaped.

>>60228308

Can't say I've every had that problem. Every URL I've thrown at it has worked fine.

>>60224171
Yandex works better indeed. It has at least no NFSW restriction etc etc.