>Vivaldi is acting up on me, switch to chromium.
>Shit actually works, shitty video players don't get stuck and webm don't freeze
>Faster on startup, and (only slightly) when loading pages
Is this the power of the botnet?
A shame that you can't customize its GUI vivaldi's one was cash.
>>60215777
Run vivaldi in ram using profile-sync-daemon. If you don't use linux and can't do that then you can just die in a fire
>>60215777
Nik's Chromium build is better than Vivaldi. Vivaldi's UI is a laggy piece of shit.
>>60216140
why isn't this managed FOR the user?
>Vivaldi's UI
>Chrome's UI
fucking chromlets when will they learn
>meanwhile on Firefox you can have any UI you want
>>60216200
Unfortunately FireFox will get chromium-level dumbed down with the release of version 57 :(
>>60216341
Think of the lack of botnet though.
>>60216368
So Nik's "No sync • No WebRTC • No Widevine" builds
>>60215777
For me is the opposite. Chromium seems to have a lot of missing plugins which makes msot porn sites useless with no video player. Also it won't allow me to watch youtube at 1080p. Vivladi may be a meme but it's better than firefox.
Why don't you use Firefox like everyone else?
>>60215777
All non botnet browsers have shit performance ;_;
>>60216394
is webRTC a big botnet? I mean, I don't use any DRM players and shit but still
>>60217432
>is webRTC a big botnet
It can cause issues. If you don't need it (and chances are you don't) then get the no-sync build
Fx can disable it via about config