Internet is Particulary Susceptible to a 'Gradient Descent

Its just another term for rotational velocidensity. All forms of storage media that the Internet is backed by face data degradation over time.

He's a charlatan. It doesn't mean anything.

Gradient descent algos are supervised training algorithms for neural networks in which the layer parameters are adjusted in the direction of descending gradient such that the network's error decreases

>>60206231
>the smartest being on the planet, the savior of persynkind
>"""a charlatan"""

is elon even human 2bh

>>60206259
It's just an iterative optimization algorithm, not necessarily limited to neural networks.

>>60206259
gradient descent is a bog standard optimization method for literally any problem with a gradient

elon musk's "statement" is exactly the kind of mind-numbing shit you would expect from either a business person pretending to be a scientist, or an artificial intelligence failing to pass as a human

>>60206362
It makes sense if you change try to look at it from a higher beings point of view.

>>60206217
This is meaningless drivel

>>60206231
doesn't understand math

>>60206259
this reads like it was written by someone who's very interested in AI but never took any math past basic algebra.

>>60206386
Fuckin dumbass

>>60206386
first one was a joke
the second one was spot on
you are autistic

>>60206386
>this reads like it was written by someone who's very interested in AI but never took any math past basic algebra.
Not him. His statement seems very clear to me. The only part that I'm not sure about wording of is "in the direction of gradient". What's your problem with it?

>>60206409
it's not spot on. gradient descent has nothing to do with neural networks a priori. it's an optimization algorithm for any differentiable function. it just so happens that a lot of problems in training neural networks can be recast as l^1 minimization problems and that is why gradient descent gets thrown around.

File: HighDeadAmericanwirehair.webm (2MB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1080px

>>60206231
ok

>>60206436
you're talking about the third one, i was talking about the second.

>>60206436
But that doesn't make his statement incorrect. He's describing one use case of gradient descent, the most popular one.

>>60206447
harry potter and the methods of rationality taught me that space rockets are like religious iconography for futurists

>>60206449
you're right, i'm an idiot.

>>60206447
Elon Musk would literally have to stop world hunger for people to be impressed. When you do amazing shit all the time people get used to it.

>>60206423
any mathematician should say gradient descent algorithms are methods by which, without loss of generality, the minimum of some differentiable function can be found.

>>60206534
But sometimes you do want to lose generality to help people understand the subject better.

>>60206534
>the minimum
*a local minimum

>>60206551
Fuck you and fuck your retarded ass "deep learning" bullshit

>>60206609
?

File: 1488602436617.png (83KB, 580x607px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 580x607px

>>60206551
How is internet particularly susceptible to it though?

Was he drunk when he wrote this?

>>60206661
i think he's trying to say that if you were to model taking down the internet as an optimization problem then it would be well-behaved under gradient descent

it should be immediately obvious that there's no substance behind this, and it's just faux-scientific braggadocio

>>60206661
most of his fans won't know what the big words mean and will just be amazed that he said them and that he must be a very smart person
he keeps pushing out quotes like that and to one of his cultists it feels like being terry a davis and executing godwords.sh
random words from a pool of words with a common connotation like "happy" or "technobabble", interpreted by someone who desperately seeks a meaning in the noise he was provided with

>>60206386
>>60206436
>>60206534
>>60206609
Found the salty math student that can't get a job
Go back to shitposting on /sci/

>>60206661
I'm not arguing in favor of Elon Musk, I'm arguing in favor of >>60206259 who provided a simple explanation of what gradient descent means in this context.

>>60206138
Basically the IoT wars going on right now if you haven't been paying attention.

>>60206447
Wow, amazing, incredible. A rocket landing. NASA sure haven't done that before.

>>60206744
Found the retard with shit for brains.

>>60207238
but they haven't
>inb4 you get a rocket landing confused with something else
>inb4 you link the company that landed rockets that never even made it to space

>mfw I know exactly what the context of every tweet Musk puts out is
>mfw his tweets trigger the shit out of so many people and they can't understand why

He is the ultimate funposter. I love this man for the simple fact that with a single tweet he can generate a billion dollars in revenue for this company, that he can shit-talk very high level people in other industries and government (and get a rise out of them), and that he can trigger literal nobodies on the doll who post on 4chan. All at the same time.

I can't think of any who I wish I was more.

>>60206138
entire internet can be conquered with sufficient amount of intelligent thought

File: MmSL2E2.png (103KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1280x1024px

Elon should revive the sea dragon desu

>>60207238
But they haven't.

>>60206447
How do we know it's not CGI?

Check & mate. Musk is scamming the government for unlimited gibs.

File: 1493890155891.png (67KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1280x1024px

>>60208442

File: 1-Pmbz0IEounzZL_xc1yt7Tw.jpg (118KB, 1500x803px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1500x803px

>>60206138
I think he was refering to the fact, that you can get stuck in a local optimum, if you have set the wrong parameters. So there might be a much better "spot", but your current information tells you you're at the perfect spot already.
I'm not absolutely sure that this is what he was refering to though.

File: 1471084491598.jpg (26KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 540x540px

If Elon Musk is so smart, why couldnt he keep a marriage together?

But seriously, we cant trust this guy with the AI codes.

>>60206447
Why not use a parachute to land a rocket instead?

>>60210054
You cant charge tens of millions of dollars on parachute tech and r&d

File: 1302011648298.jpg (421KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1920x1200px

In a couple of years, human words won't be enough for him to express himself. He's like the goddam Data Overmind. I'm not sure I trust him.

File: freshmaker.png (310KB, 1548x1116px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1548x1116px

>>60209104
over 6,000,000 hours in paint.

>>60211279
Caught me off guard.

>>60206447
Wow, increadibly, good Job Space X engineers. Now tell me what this has to do with Musk?

>>60209708
Not even the smartest man in the world can udnerstand a woman

>>60210670
she looks cute

>>60207238
have you?

>>60210054
reminds me of my Russian chem teacher
>In Yoo ess off A americans make pen
>americans make pen that write in space
>americans spend billion dollars to make pen
>In mother Russia we use lead pencil
>write in class
>write in space
>write underwater
>write everywhere

>>60206138
stop putting this asshole's pic on any article just to look smart, he isn't smart he isn't nerd he is just a fucking opportunist, dirty & ruthless businessman who plays the role of a nerd very well in the eyes of the public

>>60211608
is he success?

>>60211337
Women will be the majority in Hell.

>>60211337
That's wrong.
Gay men can understand women and this is why they're gay.

>>60208528
>>60207703

They've landed things that are much more difficult on places much farther away. Every Moon landing, every probe that went to Mars, Venus or Titan. Congratulations SpaceX, you can do what NASA have been doing for decades, but only much closer.

>>60211396
Yuki Nagato

>>60211922
any good porn of her?

>>60211315
This

Musk is a fucking sociopath businessman, he doesn't do shit but shuffle money around

File: Screenshot_20170504-172633.jpg (334KB, 1080x1133px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 1080x1133px

>>60206138
This is the context.
I think he means that neural networks could easily be used to take down the internet, but:
1. I don't really see it
2. "Gradient descent algo"s are not advanced AI
3. Why would the internet be particularly susceptible to neural networks?

I'd sacrifice my firstborn to Musk, but here he was probably drunk or something