[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Try YouTube's new design. https://www.youtube.com/new

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 150
Thread images: 19

File: [email protected] (144KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]
dark_screenshot_600@2x-vflR1Z7oG.png
144KB, 1200x675px
Try YouTube's new design.

https://www.youtube.com/new
New material design
Video player seems to widen out to the size of the browser
Dark mode options(click your profile top right)
>>
>>60186879
>more material design cancer

Fuck me I can't wait for this design meme to be over with.
>>
>google chrome only
fuck off faggot
>>
>>60186879
>new
ive had this shit for a couple months now
>>
what the fuck is a material

what happened to just "themes" or "colorschemes"
what the fuck is going on
>>
>>60186879
The HTML5 player design seems to fit a lot better with this design.
>>
>>60186893
This
>>
can someone tell me whats wrong with material design
>>
>>60186908
It's some meme design methodology Google came up with. Has to do with looking like real ink and paper and how materials would look like. Idfk man.
>>
>>60186923
It looks like it's designed for kiddos
>>
>>60186948
i guess that would make sense if google designed shit with actual graphics, but most of their end-user front-end stuff is fucking text and simple symbols, so wtf. that seems a little (what's the word?) heavy-handed/overengineered/self-aggrandizing?
>>
>>60186961
Most of the users are kiddos
>>
how do i revert back to the old youtube? this shit takes more ram
>>
This isn't new its been the default for months.
>>
>>60186895
It works in all browsers now. Just activate it from the top right corner
>>
OH FUCK HOW DO I GO BACK?!
>>
>>60187283
>>60187338
click circle with your face on it > revert to old theme
>>
Honestly this is better than the previous one. Not saying it's good, I hate this shit, but the previous(or semi-current design) is some god awful mixture of material and 2.0 that just doesn't feel right. Maybe we should start using porn sites from now on, they are surprisingly primitive.
>>
I was mad when they removed the "content location: worldwide"

You still can't pick it

Why would they do that
>>
>>60187408
Although, this is a lot nicer with the dark mode somehow. All that white is straining on the eyes.
>>
>>60187417
also, for some reason my "disable HTML5 autoplay" addon for firefox brakes playback. Can't play any fucking videos.
>>
How do I enable nu-youtube. Mine is still the old one.
>>
>>60187470
Found it. Try new features in bottom of page.
>>
>>60187470
Become a numale
>>
>>60186893
What exactly is the alternative? Making things simpler where they can be is a good thing. Beveled edges on everything looked like absolute ass, and don't even get me started on the gloss everywhere from the previous decade.
>>
>dark mode
i like it
>>
>>60188103
https://userstyles.org/styles/123887/youtube-better-full-dark-theme-2017-arc
>>
>>60188049
>the gloss everywhere from the previous decade
I miss the gloss
windows 7 with Internet Explorer and glossy sites
I hope it will make a comeback soon
>>
>>60186879
It looks dank as fuck, especially w/ userstyles.org/styles/103234/youtube-theme
>>
File: 154.gif (71KB, 300x100px) Image search: [Google]
154.gif
71KB, 300x100px
>>60186879

It's hot garbage that offers no new functionality and only shuffles shit around cause the design team at google is sitting there with their thumbs up their asses and figured they had to do *something*.
>>
File: 2005firstvid[1].jpg (45KB, 650x405px) Image search: [Google]
2005firstvid[1].jpg
45KB, 650x405px
>>60188049
>simpler

it only looks simpler, it still has hundreds of bloated javashit spyware/jewgle+ and other social media integration fucking cancer scripts running in the background.

pic related is simple, but still has all the features anyone would ever need on a video streaming site.
>>
>>60187331
how much are they paying you?
>>
>>60187181
ikr
>>
>>60188317
haha totally forgot you could rate stuff with stars back in the day.

shit even netflix stopped doing it this month or something, now you can only give thumbsup/down.
>>
Any one that switched.

Click profile
Click send feedback
post results
????
Profit.
>>
>>60188508
I already sent mine. Too bad. I don't think they ever respond to those.
>>
>>60188397
They're going to get rid of the rating system altogether eventually imo
>>
>>60188518
Weird, their auto screenshot script keeps crashing on mine.
Then again you're probably no JS.
>>
YT taking over 4chan.
>>
>>60186879
>Your browser is not supported. Try it with the latest Google Chrome.
>>
>>60188397
I really loved Netflix's old rating system, that algorithm was amazing up until a year or two ago.

Now all I ever get are recommendations for nothing but shit.
>>
>>60186879
comfy tb8
>>
>>60186879
>google made youtube worse again
>>
>>60188317
>tfw jewgle removed video responses
fuck them
>>
>>60186923
It's part of a collection of mobile paradigms that make things less useful and more anticonsumer

>>60188049
making things "simpler" by hiding shit, removing features and changing text into heiroglyphics is fucking retarded. especially when:
>>60188317
>>
File: 1409623141958.jpg (67KB, 686x720px) Image search: [Google]
1409623141958.jpg
67KB, 686x720px
>only took them 10 years for a dark theme
>will probably remove it next time they change things around for no reason
>>
>>60188814
Netflix recommendations are just showing you the most watched programs. It doesn't even make much of an effort at all to curate for you.
>>
>>60186879
How can I downlaod every video in a playlist in one big go?
>>
File: firefox_2017-05-03_19-07-30.png (735KB, 1310x980px) Image search: [Google]
firefox_2017-05-03_19-07-30.png
735KB, 1310x980px
>>60187331
>>60188331
exactly 1000 posts apart, isn't that interesting

anyway, it works in firefox.
>>
dark themes are cancer
>>
>>60189392
>less blinding white light at night time is a bad thing

k
>>
>>60189244
youtube dl
>>
Surely this is the pinnacle of design. Nothing but video thumbnails, no borders anywhere, nothing but black text on white background. Surely, this runs fine on a 15 year old PC, right?
>>
File: itsok.webm (974KB, 1080x810px) Image search: [Google]
itsok.webm
974KB, 1080x810px
this looks fucking awful. every iteration just gets worse and worse, it's like they want to obfuscate the few useful bits of information still left on the page as much as possible. no seperators between info boxes, all text is now the same color with no easy visual seperation, the views/likes/subscribe shit is all pointlessly moved around and made less obvious, this is fucking cancer. I work in graphic design and I honestly can't believe the shit people in "top tier design firms" get paid for, this is the lowest-common-denominator of visual style and aesthetic appeal. fuck me.
>>
>>60186879
>everything is just larger
>looks like a mobile page
>looks like garbage on my non-1080p laptop
WHY
>>
>>60186879
Looks more like Pornhub than before. Nice.
>>
>>60189422

Link?
>>
>Dark mode for youtube
>Chrome doesn't still have a dark theme worth a shit that doesn't have a 1px white horizontal bar under the address bar

My god why don't they off themselves already fucking subhuman trash
>>
>>60186879
>hovering over the left menu creates a scrollbar which moves the content on the right
Terrible.
>>
>>60189451
If you can't google youtube dl I don't imagine you're gonna have an easy time using it.
>>
>>60189453
you have ruined my life
>>
>>60189472
What is google?
[spoiler]thanks senpai[/spoiler]
>>
>>60189475
If you're a google representative I really hope so
>>
>>60186879
Not a fan, but I wouldn't really mind it after a few days.
However, I've noticed that it's slower for some fucking unknown reason, despite having less going on.
WHY???
>>
>>60189436
Yeah it's purely disgusting. If you're going to be simple you better fucking take out the trash running in the background. Instead of being utilitarian or giving you features at this point they're just making it a one-button thing while still extracting all the possible data from you.

This shit is all flat and lifeless. It represents sad times ahead and corporations giving no fucks.
>>
Anything to replace this?
https://github.com/YePpHa/YouTubeCenter/wiki/Developer-Version
>>
>You want subscriptions to be the default page? Fuck you!

Now

>You want to access subscriptions? Fuck you, you have to open the side bar

Bravo google, bra vo
>>
>>60189557
Goddammit, they managed to fuck it up even more.

In what fucking tongue do I have to scream that I DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT YOUR RECOMENDATIONS.
>>
>>60189590
>B-but anon we want you to find more people to subscribe!
>What's that? You want to look for them yourself? No no no, we're advertisers, we can't have you decide for yourself
>>
>>60188317
Video responses, tags. Videos from the same subscription right there, instead of having to visit their page. They could have this design with widescreen videos, make some buttons a little bit less dated and have the exact same features, and god damn it I really doubt they'd lose anything.
>>
File: Untitled-1.jpg (971KB, 3840x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled-1.jpg
971KB, 3840x1080px
I wouldn't mind it if they didn't put so much space between everything... and managed to make it look cramped at the same time. At least that's how I feel, I'm not going blind but the new layout makes everything look BIIIIIIG on a 21.5" screen when it doesn't have to be.
>>
>>60186879
>Video player seems to widen out to the size of the browser

This is the only bad part about it
>>
>>60188317
i miss those times man
>>
Only good thing about this shit design is dark mode.
>>
File: dsafdsa.png (671KB, 1411x826px) Image search: [Google]
dsafdsa.png
671KB, 1411x826px
>>60188317
>pic related is simple

that's literally and figuratively false

fucking nostalgic autist
>>
>>60190183
>big stupid subscribe button
>autoplay enabled by default
>autoplay to a video that is completely unrelated
>almost nothing else, most options buried under menus / different buttons
>>
>>60190259
this
>>
>>60190259
>most options buried under menus / different buttons


that's what menus are for you fucking idiot..

you think dumping every single option on the video page make is "simple" ?

sometimes the autism on this board makes me rage.

go take your fucking medicine faggot
>>
>>60189725
why are they different?
>>
>>60190183
>YouTube AU
>AU

whew, almost took this bait. go fuck a kangaroo.
>>
>>60190288
>that's what menus are for you fucking idiot..

advanced options is what they're good for

>you think dumping every single option on the video page make is "simple"?

Nobody said every option and yes, it's simple enough

>sometimes the autism on this board makes me rage.

glad I could help

>go take your fucking medicine faggot

I'm not the one assuming that everything two starbucks coffee drinking spacegendered turboqueers copypaste in 3 minutes is "progress" and gets fits of rage when someone believes otherwise so I don't think I need meds
>>
>>60190347
Did you fuck a kangaroo? Why do you propose it to the others?
>>
>>60186879
>video player takes up width of the entire screen
fuck yes. first good design change youtube has ever undergone
>>
>>60190288
>that's what menus are for you fucking idiot..
then your option isn't the most simple. Check mate
>>
>>60190459
Only good thing about the new design. Even the dark theme is shit compared to youtube umbra.
>>
>>60188344
>Durr if does not have shaders and shit it's made for kiddos :^).
How insecure are you fags? Grow a pair and stop caring what people think.
>>
>>60190537
I stopped caring what people think, which is why I dislike material design
>>
>>60189436
Clearly your graphics design is outdated shit then. It's fine as is, STOP ADDING SHIT WHEN ITS NOT NEEDED YOU DENSE FUCK. At least YouTube designers know how to do their job it seems. All the information you need is right there.

I can understand bit liking the color scheme because it looks like it makes for kids. But that just means you're an insecure adolescent friends.
>>
It's fucking nothing.
With ads blocked, all the options you don't need in the sidebar hidden, a dark mode already installed and the shortcut to the site actually going to the sub page, all that's changed is the sidebar items looking slightly bigger.
Oh yeah, and for some reason no more link to my channel, that's just grand.
Looking closely at the complete site, it seems they removed the "get youtube red" button, that's a plus.
>>
>>60190578
Clearly you do since you are comparing it to something made for kids. So you care about the perception people have at what is targeted towards adults and kids. And you do not want to be part of what is marketed towards "kids".

You have a brain are you ever going to use it? Or just off yourself so we have one less waste of space on the world.
>>
>>60190631
>the perception people have at what is targeted towards kids

Except in the vast majority of cases no one's going to tell you "material design is for kids!" because everyone's fucking used to this design and they want it everyfuckingwhere. It is not exactly the popular opinion around so if I wanted to be cool around, I'd actually praise that design and call people grandpas and autists like some other faggots around here.

Also I don't particularly think it's for kids, I just think it's garbage, plain, lifeless and even unintuitive from an utilitarian's point of view. I'm not pretending to dislike it. I just dislike it.

>You have a brain are you ever going to use it? Or just off yourself so we have one less waste of space on the world.

Basically, someone says it's for kids, you get offended, and then proceed to act like an immature twat. I'm beginning to think you're actually not an adult.
>>
>>60190590
They can't seem to fix how YouTube functions outside of it's design
>>
>>60186879
Holy shit fucking cancer for tablet design.
>>
how the fuck do you enable the dark mode
>>
Question. How to decrease the font size?

>>60190862
Top right avatar icon. All mixed config options, yeah.
>>
>>60190889
>Top right avatar icon. All mixed config options, yeah.
Oh ok, at first for some reason it kept me redirecting to my G+ account as if I was using the still design (or something fucked up and used both?) but after refreshing the page it now shows the menu, thanks.
>>
>>60186893
Well this isn't material design, it's flat design. Material implies the use of depth and color to portray materials, this design is just coloured planes and text.
>>
>>60186879
Pretty good Tbh
>>
>>60190889
>>60190909
Oh also, decreasing font sizes alone won't work, for instance if you make the sidebar fonts smaller these elements remain big as fuck so they have their own heights set as well, would require much more than changing the fonts to make things look smaller.
>>
>>60186879
literally the same but black
>>
File: 1476545352808.jpg (61KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]
1476545352808.jpg
61KB, 1000x800px
>>60186879

pretty good thanks for sharing
>>
Holy crap thats bloated
Scrolling makes my CPU usage spike quite a bit
>>
>2017
>sidebar
>auto collapsing
>even harder to reach my subscriptions
>absolute cancer pseudo material design
>>
>>60191076
>but the screen next to the video, we'll make pitch black with no option to change it

There's literally nothing wrong with this

then again you're german, you can't grasp it
>>
Has there ever been a big update to youtube that didn't do more harm than good
>>
This is made for tablets and TVs in mind while completely ignoring normal PC users. Too big fonts, cannot read the full descriptions anymore. Contrast that hurts the eyes with the white mode.

It even adds one more unnecessary click. While watching videos, now you have to click the top left for the menu to show up.

>>60191155
The html5 player is the only one that can think about.
>>
>>60186902
A-B Testign
>>
>>60186879
I wont say I dis metro/material/flat/whatever design, I like it. This is just a more streamlined version of the old layout, it's actually an improvement. Props to Google for not actually fucking up again and instead making positive changes.

10/10 ign
>>
How to enable dark theme in a link? (So that I don't have to fucking click it myself/join the google botnet every time I visit jewtube through one of my bookmarks)
>>
>>60187417
worldwide had trending content from the us. so us right now is the same as the old worldwide
>>
>>60188317
We are talking about the aesthetic design you dumb slut, no need to bring up things everyone here already agrees on.
>>
File: yt.png (815KB, 2424x940px) Image search: [Google]
yt.png
815KB, 2424x940px
EVERY FUCKING UPDATE GOOGLE DOES, THEY ALWAYS PUT LESS INFORMATION ON SCREEN, ITS LIKE THEY THINK WE ARE BLIND.
>>
File: 1492119509060.webm (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
1492119509060.webm
1MB, 640x360px
>>60192782
yeah I fucking hate this as well
>>
FUCK, this thing breaks all the no-autoplay addons.

How do I go back?!?!?
>>
Does anyone know how to stop the autoplay?
besides magic actions...
>>
>>60192782
Blame touchscreen users and their intrusive fat opaque fingers.
>>
>>60186879
I like it, they improved theater mode too
>>
Not everything needs to be in a single column
>>
File: garbage-man.jpg (351KB, 816x588px) Image search: [Google]
garbage-man.jpg
351KB, 816x588px
>>60186879
Doesn't work with Youtube High Definition
>>
It's really not that bad. I wish they had more features readily available but at the same time previous YouTube layouts were such ass.
600 different buttons and links surrounding the video is just as bad as hiding from most functionality. You autistic spergs want webpages to resemble TI-84s instead of something actually functionally efficient.
>>
Any way to opt out from this shit?
I mean, it's not horrible... if you use a pad. But it isn't better.
>>
>>60193670
click your profile picture in the top right and it's at the bottom of the list
>>
File: Wojak crying blood.png (236KB, 808x805px) Image search: [Google]
Wojak crying blood.png
236KB, 808x805px
>>60186879
>Syria to Canada
>>
>>60188317
>implying pic related wasn't bloated with javascript to begin with
literal autism
>>
>>60189422
mpsyt
>>
>>60186879
I like it
>>
>>60193854
wrong
>>
>>60186879
Absolutely disgusting.
>>
Search bar looks a bit off.
>>
>>60193983
Agreed. Shouldn't have the border.
Otherwise I like it.
>>
>>60188232
had to tweak it a little but yeah it's comfy
>>
>>60188317
Everything is there, nothing hidden behind some buttons glad the nips didnt fall for the material design unlike the jew worshiping west
>>
How do I remove this shit again?
>>
>>60196993
delete cookies
>>
File: abstract mike.jpg (64KB, 466x466px) Image search: [Google]
abstract mike.jpg
64KB, 466x466px
>random amateurs can make userscripts that look better than what googles team of professional webdesigners create after years of work

really makes your neurons emit electrochemical signals
>>
File: wdg.webm (256KB, 856x324px) Image search: [Google]
wdg.webm
256KB, 856x324px
people are getting paid for this
>>
>>60197161
miserable
>>
>>60197161
The very reason I switched right the fuck back. Also it looks horrible.
>>
What the fuck is this?
>The feed fits 4 videos at 1080p

*
{
margin: 20px;
padding: 20px;
}

>I'm done with the new material design boss
>>
>>60186879
Genuinely hate it, I get it every time I open a new incognito window and it's ass
I fear for when it becomes permanent

Can Bob build an Army again?
>>
>>60186991
The design was made for Android, where it's more appropriate. But it's pretty so they're trying to put it everywhere. It would be fine if they just kept some of the design choices that made it pretty but adapted it to increase information density on the desktop. As it stands it just makes their websites look very featureless, barren and amateurish.
>>
>>60187417
I was mad when they removed subscription "collections" (folders) for no apparent reason.
now all subscription are bundled together with no way of filtering which ones you want to see at a given time.
Really mad.

it's the moment I switched to rss feeds +livestreamer to watch anything on youtube to avoid giving them any (you)
>>
>>60186879
>Video player seems to widen out to the size of the browser
After all these years they finally did it
>>
File: 1451773236856.gif (1MB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]
1451773236856.gif
1MB, 500x280px
>>60197161
>>
File: FlICmGnj.jpg (144KB, 1395x1395px) Image search: [Google]
FlICmGnj.jpg
144KB, 1395x1395px
Web 3.0 was a mistake.
>>
>>60193045
You're just mad because no one cares about your shitty desktops anymore. Touchscreen devices are what normal people use.
>>
>>60188317
Fucking hell, give me this Youtube back.

No fucking infinite scrolling cancer, pagination everywhere.
No shit hidden away behind sometimes cryptic symbols that only 2010 kids get. Text, text everywhere.
No G+ shitty commenting system that can kill netbooks.
No shitty HTML5 player that can barely even run properly on modern hardware, never mind older hardware. (LOL HOW TO HARDWARE ACCELERATION?)

And that isn't even getting on to the FEATURES the site has lost since that picture.
SO FUCKING MUCH GONE.
The sidebar used to be useful as fuck on Youtube.
Now it is replaced by shitty forced advertising, clickbait and mostly unrelated videos.
No useful tagging system. No video responses.
No "more from user" . No playlists at the side, it is a separate mess that sometimes shows up when you click videos, and it has forced autoplay and IGNORES your fucking settings now.

Fucking hell, how did it fail so hard?
All the old site needed was a new paint job, some features from now (like the video editor), better commenting system, done.
Nope. Youtube, Google and most large companies are FILLED to the fucking brim with "change things for changes sake" CUNTS that ruin everything you ever love.
>>
>>60186879
Did they bring back the option to sort subscriptions? No? Then it's fucking shit.
>>
>>60199213
>"change things for changes sake"
Don't be so naive, they don't just change tnings at random. They change things to optimize monetization, advertising, and delivering content to the viewer.
>>
>>60199213
Which shitty computer must you have that doesn't play HTML5 video.
Thread posts: 150
Thread images: 19


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.