Remote security exploit in all 2008+ Intel platforms https:

>>60174106
>he uses a CPU made after 1999
you deserve it desu

don't worry I'm sure intel will patch it soon

>>60174255
(((((soon)))))

Only affects server grade CPUs.

>>60174255
>patch hardware

File: Mysterious Merchant.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

Oy! They know.

>>60174106
How very convenient for say the NSA.

Soon China and Russia will start making their own hardware too. I have a mind to invest some in AMD. It seems likely a Chinese company will pay a lot to transfer their IP to china.

>>60174229
Do you think the P4(775) are safe?

Remember hearing somewhere that the P3's were the last clean ones.

>>60174106
>8 replies on an "anti" Intel article
Meanwhile the anti AMD article has over 200 replies.

Are there only 8 real people on /g/?

Damn man I dodge a bullet with Intel, feels good to go with Ryzen.

>>60174106
remember when (((everyone))) thought this was just tinfoil bullshit?

>>60174280
It affects most corporate workstations. The whole point of AMT is corporate IT, not servers.

From what information we have, it seems that a lot of consumer grade chips are also affected, but you need a Q-series chipset (probably).

>>60174393
Some fucking whore keeps posting this "semiaccurate.com" link and it's just that. Barely accurate. No one has a use for the "vuln" except the NSA but we already knew about that.
actually its making Intel look better then just a shady company spying on people and pretending to be like oh we just wanted to help u guys manage ur PCs

>>60174416
They have equivalent hardware botnet

Oy vey, Oy vey, DELET this thread right now!

>>60174507
It was acknowledged by Intel in a recent security advisory

>>60174393
We had this thread a hundred times already

File: 1493706134363.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>60174106
/pol/ was right again

>>60174416
Yeah Ryzen is better than Intel in every way possible.