Oh my god, here we go again. I hate "open-sores" faggots
Closed source is better because anyone who has worked on highly complicated code knows that as soon as you start letting amateurs fuck with your code, it makes your life harder. Good projects are complicated beyond anything most of us could possibly contribute to, so why bother to make it open source?
It's closed source because they want it to work. It's not closed source because of some massive conspiracy. It's not close source so the dev can sell it via patreon. It's not closed source because he stole code from someone.
Good projects are closed source because they are complicated beyond what most people could possibly contribute to, and opening it up to everyone with a computer to contribute to is only going to make it worse, not better.
I know that nobody understands this, or wants to understand it, because it's the giant circlejerk that the dev is hiding something, but he's not. I know none of you will apologize when someday, as promised, the code is actually opened up and everyone sees that there's nothing to hide.
you don't have to accept commits
>>60117187
This is a big bait.
>>60117187
Look is the same street shitter again.
>>60117187
please stop pushing this >>>/v/ pasta.
>open-source means anyone can contribute
Try making a pull request to the Linux git, see how far you get.
>>60117316
>taking the bait
>>60117187
I bet you think the NSA is protecting us from terrorists too
Look at him and laugh
>>60117349
>SHUT THE FUCK UP THE GOVERNMENT IS THERE TO PROTECT ME!!!