So, anon, I'm giving you another chance to explain why you

If u didn't know AMD was bailed out by the U.S government in the past few years. Ryzen is the result of that funding so ryzen is obviously a tool to spy on the people of the world. If u think that AMD is better now than you are obviously a niave idiot . In short intel is better

>>60114341
yes goy, I'm sure jewtel has my best interests in mind

>>60114341
>AMD was bailed out by the U.S government
More like AMD was paid large amounts of money to make backdoors in hardware that existed in Intel but not AMD

Why would the U.S seel a backdoor that they can use to spy that would be stupid and counterintuitive just look at the facts

I bought this CPU a few years ago, it's still working fine and none of my day-to-day tasks would benefit from a better CPU. I don't frivolously spend money on unnecessary upgrades. If and when I must purchase a new CPU for a desktop, I will consider whatever AMD offering there is, just as I have in the past, and should it be better at said time I will get it.

>>60114188
More like this please.

You are all fucking sheep upgrading to ryzen. Do whatever the hell you want

VT-x > AMD-V

File: IMG_2802.jpg (169KB, 1248x720px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1248x720px

Because of this

>>60114503
>gaming
You have to be 18 to post on this website

Also, nice cherrypicked benchmark, goy.

>>60114503
AMD rekt

File: IMG_3211.jpg (620KB, 2150x1240px) Image search: [Google]

620KB, 2150x1240px

>>60114533
Is this cherrypicked too?

>>60114188
this is a really cheap way of getting (you).

be more creative. i believe in you, anon.

>>60114480
>>60114503
>>60114565
You live to sit here posting the same 5-6 benchmarks and spam "POO", don't you?

>>60114565
>DirectX 11
yes

File: IMG_2828.jpg (193KB, 650x889px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 650x889px

>>60114611
Ok pajeet

>>60114565
Yes

I have dual xeons
maybe I'll swap when snowly owl comes out, but other than that
>consumer CPUs
lmao

File: 1470152167113.png (83KB, 328x408px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 328x408px

>>60114565
>>60114503
>>60114626

File: fake graphs.png (97KB, 764x1756px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 764x1756px

>>60114626

>>60114739
>>60114626
>>60114565
>>60114503
you must be at least 18 to post on this website

File: good goy keep posting.png (132KB, 632x1873px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 632x1873px

>>60114626
topkek

>>60114719
>tfw my EVGA x58 e760 classified mobo died 2 months ago

it has a melted diode, I wonder if it can be fixed, I love my 6 core Xenon

>>60114188
10 seconds is probably too much. These Intel fangirls have niche gaymin benches ready on standby when browsing /g/.

Fanboys just cannot deal with the facts. Ryzen is by far better than anything intel has if you look at the price you are paying. Isn't it obvious that a CPU costing 10-20% more will perform better.

File: AMD-Ryzen-1800X-Intel-6950X-1.png (29KB, 617x837px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 617x837px

>>60115574
>$1600 6950X
>performs near a $500 1800X

Finally someone with some sense god damn fanboys ruining everything

>>60114188
>BUY RYZEN
>no shills allowed
pick one

>>60114188
Because I wasn't going to Wait™ for an unproven cpu from a company whose previous product was Bulldozer and has since shown that the tasks relevant to me are a toss up between the two now, not to mention that the moar coarz bandwagon basically ignores the fact that as workloads become increasingly parallel they're also being increasingly offloaded to the gpu which is already vastly more parallel than any cpu.

Considering that I was on a nearly 10 year old cpu before.... I think I was justified

Also i enjoy OCing and Ryzen's been an OC dud so far outside of extreme cooling setups

im currently with a fx6300

should i go with the ryzen 1600 or a i5 7500 which is at the same price?

File: 2017-04-16 21.43.01.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>60114188
but i do :^)

>>60117390
The Ryzen 1600 is an absolute no-brainer over the 7500. It's better at essentially everything.

>>60117390
1600 if you're overclocking ($110+ mobo)
1600X if you're not (cheapest mobo you can find $70-80?)

>>60117390
Why a 7500? You could get a used 6700/6700K for the same or not much more, pop that in an sli plus and that's a much better comparison

>>60117430
X370 and Ryzen 5... I bought a cheap b350 board and ryzen 1700, can oc well and supports 3200 ddr4.

>>60117521
i thought about it, but got an x370 board as i feel itll get better and faster bios updates to deal w/ ram issues (not that ive had any) and for zen2/3 in the future

>STILL have an i5 or even an i7 when Ryzen is clearly better.

Why would I explain anything to anyone who has already made up their mind.

It's literally wasted breath.

>>60117600
A few months ago, a 6900k was the best consumer CPU money could buy.

Now? Nobody needs more than 4 cores!

>>60114188
Planning an upgrade after Vega launches and I see some solid reviews. I'm still using an i5 4690k and a Tri-X R9 290.

>>60117622
What are you on about no one has ever needed more than 4 cores for gaming and just because something is considered the best consumer CPU doesn't mean something else cannot be good. We are also comparing CPUs that are in different tiers you can hardly expect a $500 ryzen CPU to beat an intel $1000 CPU.Get your shit together

>>60117693
Hahahahaha!

>>60117693
Did somebody say... heated?

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170427_072254.jpg (2MB, 766x8714px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 766x8714px

>>60117693
>you can hardly expect a $500 ryzen CPU to beat an intel $1000 CPU.Get your shit together

But it does in rather a large number of use cases.

>>60114188
Because I accept this difference

Gayming, get intel

Workstation/multitask etc. Get Amd

Could care less, just get what suits the purpose for you

>>60117693

>you can hardly expect a $500 ryzen CPU to beat an intel $1000 CPU.Get your shit together

dohohoho

https://www.servethehome.com/intel-xeon-e3-1280-v6-linux-benchmarks-and-review/

>>60117748
Because the only way to gayme is with a delided 7700k on a $200 motherboard?

I'm not angry but people seem to have the intelligence of goldfish when they start to go all fanboying

>>60117765

What part did I mention that involved this being a requirement, its the owners own choice, purchase and risk with their hardware.

I got a new 7700K for $180.

Was it broken

I bet it was

Fucking AMD fan boys

Does no one here care about the fact that intel are selling their users info to the FBI like random generator keys for encryption

What are you on about you sound like a retarded conspiracy theorists

>>60117774
Don't worry they are like that all the time.

>>60114341
Citation needed.

My i7 is still no where close to a bottleneck yet. Im not going to replace my cpu just because

>>60118500
Nobody is talking to you we don't care about your i7 with 100 cores and megathreading we are talking about i5 and ryzen

>>60114188
Too poor to upgrade

>>60114188
>I'm giving you another chance to explain why you STILL have an i5 or even an i7
>>60118500
>we are talking about i5 and ryzen
>have an i5 or even an i7
>we are talking about i5
>or even an i7

>>60117748
Smooth gayming, get AMD
Stuttering (but higher overall average FPS which won't matter anyway), get Intel

>>60118791
Well said

>>60114188
because ayyyyymd was too fucking slow to get ryzen out

i didnt feel like waiting well over a year for my pc when i needed upgrade asp

and now i dont feel like making big lose on my slightly over 1 year old cpu with preformance was satosfying so far
just to jump on
>MUH COARS MOAR MOAR COARS RRRRAARAARAA

>>60119492
This post smells of summer.

>>60114188
why spend money for a tiny bit improvement over sandy bridge