What would you call the kind of motion blur you see in this image,

>>60086924
just dont watch TV you fucking retard

>>60086924
In that gif it's just shitty compression. They use webm now for a reason.

>>60086924
that in the image seems to be a mix of
- compression artefacts
- the fact that GIF only supports one set of 256 colors within an image, maybe related: shitty algorithm for dithering

what would cause that on a TV, idk

>>60086969
>>60086967
Will the cable tv stream (including on demand) have compression issues?

other random fact - if I go frame by frame, it doesn't appear. only shows at normal speed.

File: dvb-s.jpg (94KB, 1278x719px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1278x719px

>>60087013
digital tv can show artifacts if the signal is low (pic related, random image for satellite TV / dvb-s) but I've never seen it like your picture

have you replaced the cables yet? any weird bends in the cable, boxes/switches between wall and receiver?

>>60087059
a guy came and replaced everything except the coax running across the attic. Said everything checked out (briefly had that digital error when he removed the signal booster my old cable company had, which lead to him replacing everything network related from the yard in).

File: 20170426_173057 (3).webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

Made a webm of the artifact. Paused the tv at the end, to show how it exists even when paused.

>>60087455
bump

>>60087455
this is an mpeg2 artifact, which means your cable company is not conforming to current DVB specs for some reason. absolutely nothing you can do about it senpi